Cervical cancer screening across 19 European countries: trends and ecological correlates, 2013-2023
Abstract
Background: Despite the 85% desirable participation level set by European guidelines, EU cervical screening averaged only 55% in 2022. Ecological evidence integrating socioeconomic, health-system, well-being and epidemiological domains in one model is scarce.
Methods: Ecological pooled time-series analysis of cervical screening coverage rates (SCRs) in women aged 20-69 in 19 European countries, 2013-2023, using OECD, Eurostat, World Bank and UNICEF data. Pooled and country-specific linear/quadratic OLS regressions tested time trends. Univariate logit-normal regressions with bootstrap 95% CIs tested associations with 20 predictors in four domains: socioeconomic, healthcare-system, health/well-being, epidemiological.
Results: Coverage patterns shifted geographically. SCRs ranged from 5.7% (Romania) to 80.5% (Sweden) in 2013, with a comparable spread in 2023. Only Czechia, Finland, Ireland, Slovenia and Sweden maintained the 70% threshold; none reached 85%. The pooled trend was flat. Four countries had an increasing trend (Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway), five high-income countries declined (Denmark, Hungary, Iceland, Netherlands, UK). Cross-sectional analyses found significant associations with educational attainment, income inequality and self-reported screening, and—to our knowledge novel ecologically—a subjective well-being indicator: higher population-level negative affect was associated with lower coverage. No association emerged with healthcare spending or HPV vaccination.
Conclusions: European cervical screening stagnated and remained unevenly distributed over 2013-2023, with declines in some high-income systems. Beyond educational and economic inequalities, population-level negative affect appears as a candidate ecological correlate warranting further study. Multimodal strategies reaching the target population (invitations, reminders, HPV self-sampling, outreach) and policies on socioeconomic and well-being determinants may help advance European goals.
Key messages: • Cervical screening coverage stagnated across 19 European countries in 2013-2023; population-level negative affect emerged as a candidate ecological correlate beyond classic determinants.
• Cervical screening policy in Europe should integrate socioeconomic and well-being determinants alongside organised delivery to reduce persistent cross-country inequities.
Related
- Assessing coping, loneliness, resilience and partner burden in patients with skin conditions: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study across 23 dermatology centres in 15 European countries
- Optimising HPV Vaccination for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Women Living with HIV: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Across 13 African Countries
- Target trial emulation of effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination during pregnancy in four European countries
- Trends in cardiovascular disease mortality and burden in Albania, 1990-2023: a comparison with Southeastern European countries
- European Code Against Cancer receptivity: latent profile analysis across four European countries
BibTeX
@article{florio2026cervical,
title = {{Cervical cancer screening across 19 European countries: trends and ecological correlates, 2013-2023}},
author = {P Florio and P Marraffa and GMM Politano and MM Gianino},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1795},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1795},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Cervical cancer screening across 19 European countries: trends and ecological correlates, 2013-2023
AU - P Florio
AU - P Marraffa
AU - GMM Politano
AU - MM Gianino
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1795
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1795
AB - Background: Despite the 85% desirable participation level set by European guidelines, EU cervical screening averaged only 55% in 2022. Ecological evidence integrating socioeconomic, health-system, well-being and epidemiological domains in one model is scarce. Methods: Ecological pooled time-series analysis of cervical screening coverage rates (SCRs) in women aged 20-69 in 19 European countries, 2013-2023, using OECD, Eurostat, World Bank and UNICEF data. Pooled and country-specific linear/quadratic OLS regressions tested time trends. Univariate logit-normal regressions with bootstrap 95% CIs tested associations with 20 predictors in four domains: socioeconomic, healthcare-system, health/well-being, epidemiological. Results: Coverage patterns shifted geographically. SCRs ranged from 5.7% (Romania) to 80.5% (Sweden) in 2013, with a comparable spread in 2023. Only Czechia, Finland, Ireland, Slovenia and Sweden maintained the 70% threshold; none reached 85%. The pooled trend was flat. Four countries had an increasing trend (Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway), five high-income countries declined (Denmark, Hungary, Iceland, Netherlands, UK). Cross-sectional analyses found significant associations with educational attainment, income inequality and self-reported screening, and—to our knowledge novel ecologically—a subjective well-being indicator: higher population-level negative affect was associated with lower coverage. No association emerged with healthcare spending or HPV vaccination. Conclusions: European cervical screening stagnated and remained unevenly distributed over 2013-2023, with declines in some high-income systems. Beyond educational and economic inequalities, population-level negative affect appears as a candidate ecological correlate warranting further study. Multimodal strategies reaching the target population (invitations, reminders, HPV self-sampling, outreach) and policies on socioeconomic and well-being determinants may help advance European goals. Key messages: • Cervical screening coverage stagnated across 19 European countries in 2013-2023; population-level negative affect emerged as a candidate ecological correlate beyond classic determinants. • Cervical screening policy in Europe should integrate socioeconomic and well-being determinants alongside organised delivery to reduce persistent cross-country inequities.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -