Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

How Common Are Common Envelopes? Quantifying Their Role in Forming Gravitational-Wave Sources

5 more authors

Abstract

A central goal of gravitational-wave astronomy is to use merging binary black hole (BBH), black hole-neutron star (BHNS), and binary neutron star (BNS) systems as fossils to reconstruct the formation and evolution of massive stars across cosmic time. In practice, this inference relies on population-synthesis models that map massive stellar binaries to merging compact objects. However, these models disagree on the dominant orbital-hardening mechanisms within isolated binary evolution, particularly on whether common-envelope (CE) evolution is required. To address this, we compile and systematically compare formation-channel predictions from more than 200 isolated-binary population-synthesis simulations, organized within a unified hierarchical taxonomy. We find that BBH and BHNS formation pathways span nearly the full allowed range from CE-dominated to without-CE-dominated evolution (0-100%), while often predicting similar merger rates, revealing a fundamental degeneracy: merger-rate measurements alone do not uniquely constrain the underlying evolutionary pathways. In contrast, BNS formation proceeds almost exclusively through channels involving at least one CE phase (>90-100%), suggesting CE evolution plays a qualitatively different role in BNS than in BBH and BHNS formation. The relative contributions of with-CE and without-CE pathways are governed primarily by assumptions controlling mass-transfer stability, angular-momentum loss, CE efficiency, and supernova physics, which often act non-linearly and in correlated fashion, such that trends from one-at-a-time parameter variations do not generalize across simulation frameworks. Robust interpretation of gravitational-wave populations will therefore require transparent formation-channel definitions, reproducible analysis pipelines, systematic cross-code comparisons, and observational constraints that extend beyond merger rates alone.

Related

  1. Angular momentum drives proton-rich nucleosynthesis in hyperaccreting neutron stars in common envelopes
    Alexander D Hall-Smith, S E D Abrahams, A M Laird +3
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedHigh-energy astrophysicsCrossref
  2. Gravitational instability in planet-forming discs
    Cristiano Longarini, Giuseppe Lodato
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPlanetary science & exoplanetsarXiv
  3. Spectral Fingerprints Beyond Degeneracies in Primordial Gravitational-Wave Sources
    Subhasis Maiti
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  4. SPLIT: Loosely-coherent inference of long-inspiral gravitational-wave sources for robustness against modeling and data outliers
    Shubham Kejriwal
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  5. Milky Way Structure from Double White Dwarf Gravitational-Wave Sources
    Shao-Dong Zhao, Xue-Hao Zhang, Qun-Ying Xie +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGalaxiesInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{broekgaarden2026common,
  title = {{How Common Are Common Envelopes? Quantifying Their Role in Forming Gravitational-Wave Sources}},
  author = {Floor S. Broekgaarden and Ana Lam and Sasha Levina and Jakub Klencki and Kyle A. Rocha and Lieke van Son and Steffani M. Grondin and Monica Gallegos-Garcia and Brian D. Metzger and Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz and Angela Twum and Melanie Santiago and Julia Haynes and Tyler B. Smith and Amedeo Romagnolo and Edo Berger and Lucas M. de Sá},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.05322},
  eprint = {2606.05322},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05322},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - How Common Are Common Envelopes? Quantifying Their Role in Forming Gravitational-Wave Sources
AU  - Floor S. Broekgaarden
AU  - Ana Lam
AU  - Sasha Levina
AU  - Jakub Klencki
AU  - Kyle A. Rocha
AU  - Lieke van Son
AU  - Steffani M. Grondin
AU  - Monica Gallegos-Garcia
AU  - Brian D. Metzger
AU  - Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz
AU  - Angela Twum
AU  - Melanie Santiago
AU  - Julia Haynes
AU  - Tyler B. Smith
AU  - Amedeo Romagnolo
AU  - Edo Berger
AU  - Lucas M. de Sá
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.05322
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05322
AB  - A central goal of gravitational-wave astronomy is to use merging binary black hole (BBH), black hole-neutron star (BHNS), and binary neutron star (BNS) systems as fossils to reconstruct the formation and evolution of massive stars across cosmic time. In practice, this inference relies on population-synthesis models that map massive stellar binaries to merging compact objects. However, these models disagree on the dominant orbital-hardening mechanisms within isolated binary evolution, particularly on whether common-envelope (CE) evolution is required. To address this, we compile and systematically compare formation-channel predictions from more than 200 isolated-binary population-synthesis simulations, organized within a unified hierarchical taxonomy. We find that BBH and BHNS formation pathways span nearly the full allowed range from CE-dominated to without-CE-dominated evolution (0-100%), while often predicting similar merger rates, revealing a fundamental degeneracy: merger-rate measurements alone do not uniquely constrain the underlying evolutionary pathways. In contrast, BNS formation proceeds almost exclusively through channels involving at least one CE phase (>90-100%), suggesting CE evolution plays a qualitatively different role in BNS than in BBH and BHNS formation. The relative contributions of with-CE and without-CE pathways are governed primarily by assumptions controlling mass-transfer stability, angular-momentum loss, CE efficiency, and supernova physics, which often act non-linearly and in correlated fashion, such that trends from one-at-a-time parameter variations do not generalize across simulation frameworks. Robust interpretation of gravitational-wave populations will therefore require transparent formation-channel definitions, reproducible analysis pipelines, systematic cross-code comparisons, and observational constraints that extend beyond merger rates alone.
ER  -