Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Cover-free families on graphs

Abstract

A family of subsets of a t-set is a \emph{d-cover-free family} or d-CFF if no subset in the family is contained in the union of any d other subsets. Let $t(d, n)$ denote the minimum t for which there exists a d-CFF on a t-set with n subsets. Since a $1$-CFF is the same as a Sperner family, using Sperner's theorem, we get t(1, n) ∼ log2(n) as n grows. Erdös, Frankl, and Füredi (JCTA, 1982) proved that 3.106log2(n) < t(2,n) < 5.512log2(n). This paper focuses on generalizing $1$-CFF and $2$-CFF using a graph G where vertices correspond to subsets in the set system. A G-Sperner$(t, n)$ is a family of subsets of a t-set such that each edge of G specifies a pair of subsets not contained in each other, where as a G-CFF$(t, n)$ is a family of subsets of a t-set such that it is G-Sperner and the union of a pair of subsets corresponding to each edge of G does not contain any other subset in the family. Let ts(G) and t(G) denote the minimum t for which there exist a G-Sperner$(t, n)$ and a G-CFF$(t, n)$, respectively. In this way, ts(Kn) = t(1, n) and t(Kn) = t(2, n). Firstly, we prove ts(G) = t(1, χ(G)) for any simple graph G and provide various upper and lower bounds for t(G). The \emph{trivial bound}, t(1, n) ≤ t(G) ≤ t(2, n) holds for any simple graph G with no isolated vertex, with the lower bound tight for an infinite family of star graphs and the upper bound tight for complete graphs. We study when these bounds can be improved and give better constructive upper bounds for families of graphs such as stars, paths, cycles, wheels, and windmill graphs. In particular, a construction based on mixed-radix Gray codes yields log2(n) ≤ t(Pn) ≤ t(Cn) ≤ 1.893log2(n) + 𝒪(1) where Pn and Cn are paths and cycles with n vertices.

Related

  1. Weak and strong Lefschetz properties for vertex cover Artinian algebras associated to graphs
    Trung Chau, Tran Quang Hoa, Dang Thi Kieu Uyen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Asymptotical results on the automorphism groups of canonical double cover of graphs
    Bartłomiej Bychawski, Ademir Hujdurović, Đorđe Mitrović +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Second-Order Cover Time of Random Regular Graphs
    Lisa Hartung, Andreas Klippel
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
  4. Energy of signed graphs and the vertex cover number
    Aniruddha Samanta, Deepshikha, Kinkar Chandra Das
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. The asymptotic Erd{ő}s--Frankl--Füredi cover-free conjecture
    Xinqi Huang, Hong Liu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{parida2026coverfree,
  title = {{Cover-free families on graphs}},
  author = {Prangya Parida and Lucia Moura},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.12634},
  eprint = {2605.12634},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12634},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cover-free families on graphs
AU  - Prangya Parida
AU  - Lucia Moura
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.12634
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12634
AB  - A family of subsets of a t-set is a \emph{d-cover-free family} or d-CFF if no subset in the family is contained in the union of any d other subsets. Let $t(d, n)$ denote the minimum t for which there exists a d-CFF on a t-set with n subsets. Since a $1$-CFF is the same as a Sperner family, using Sperner's theorem, we get t(1, n) ∼ log_2(n) as n grows. Erdös, Frankl, and Füredi (JCTA, 1982) proved that 3.106log_2(n) < t(2,n) < 5.512log_2(n). This paper focuses on generalizing $1$-CFF and $2$-CFF using a graph G where vertices correspond to subsets in the set system. A G-Sperner$(t, n)$ is a family of subsets of a t-set such that each edge of G specifies a pair of subsets not contained in each other, where as a G-CFF$(t, n)$ is a family of subsets of a t-set such that it is G-Sperner and the union of a pair of subsets corresponding to each edge of G does not contain any other subset in the family. Let t_s(G) and t(G) denote the minimum t for which there exist a G-Sperner$(t, n)$ and a G-CFF$(t, n)$, respectively. In this way, t_s(K_n) = t(1, n) and t(K_n) = t(2, n). Firstly, we prove t_s(G) = t(1, χ(G)) for any simple graph G and provide various upper and lower bounds for t(G). The \emph{trivial bound}, t(1, n) ≤ t(G) ≤ t(2, n) holds for any simple graph G with no isolated vertex, with the lower bound tight for an infinite family of star graphs and the upper bound tight for complete graphs. We study when these bounds can be improved and give better constructive upper bounds for families of graphs such as stars, paths, cycles, wheels, and windmill graphs. In particular, a construction based on mixed-radix Gray codes yields log_2(n) ≤ t(P_n) ≤ t(C_n) ≤ 1.893log_2(n) + 𝒪(1) where P_n and C_n are paths and cycles with n vertices.
ER  -