Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

PF-well-filtered spaces

Abstract

This paper solves two open problems concerning the well-filteredness of topological spaces. The first, due to Shen, Xi and Zhao\cite{shen2023further}, asks whether a space must be open well-filtered whenever its upper space is so; the answer is negative; the Hofmann-Lawson space provides a counterexample. The second, posed by Li, Yuan and Zhao\cite{li2020unified}, inquires whether PF-well-filteredness and PF- sobriety are equivalent under the assumption of local compactness; we answer it in the affirmative. Subsequently, we give characterizations of PF-sobriety and PF-well-filteredness for T0 spaces, respectively. On the basis of the characterizations, we obtain the following result: PF-sobriety and PF-well-filteredness coincide on the Rudin spaces, which extends the previously established equivalence for locally compact spaces, as every locally compact space is a Rudin space. Furthermore, we give a counterexample to show that for nonempty T0 topological spaces X and Y, if Y is a PF-well-filtered (PF-sober) space, then the function space consisting of all continuous maps from X to Y equipped with the Isbell topology may not be a PF-well-filtered (PF-sober) space even when X is a core-compact space. We also prove that if the function space comprising all continuous maps from nonempty X to Y endowed with the Isbell topology is PF-well-filtered (PF-sober), then Y is also PF-well-filtered (PF-sober) even though PF-sobriety and PF-well-filteredness are not preserved under retracts. Finally, we show that the reflective hull of the category of PF-well-filtered (PF-sober) spaces with continuous maps in TOP0 is TOP0.

Related

  1. A note on power spaces and function spaces of strongly well-filtered spaces
    Zhenzhu Yuan, Xiangrui Li, Bei Liu +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  2. A study for well-filtered spaces
    Zhengmao He
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  3. Besov and Triebel--Lizorkin Spaces on Filtered Lie Groups, III: the Spaces F∞,qα
    Mattia Calzi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. Besov and Triebel--Lizorkin Spaces on Filtered Lie Groups, II: Pointwise Multiplication, Localization, Differences
    Mattia Calzi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. Besov and Triebel--Lizorkin Spaces on Filtered Lie Groups with Polynomial Growth, I: Inclusions, Discretization, Duality
    Mattia Calzi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026pfwellfiltered,
  title = {{$PF$-well-filtered spaces}},
  author = {Ruoxi Chen and Qingguo Li and Longchun Wang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.21578},
  eprint = {2610.21578},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21578},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - PF-well-filtered spaces
AU  - Ruoxi Chen
AU  - Qingguo Li
AU  - Longchun Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.21578
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21578
AB  - This paper solves two open problems concerning the well-filteredness of topological spaces. The first, due to Shen, Xi and Zhao\cite{shen2023further}, asks whether a space must be open well-filtered whenever its upper space is so; the answer is negative; the Hofmann-Lawson space provides a counterexample. The second, posed by Li, Yuan and Zhao\cite{li2020unified}, inquires whether PF-well-filteredness and PF- sobriety are equivalent under the assumption of local compactness; we answer it in the affirmative. Subsequently, we give characterizations of PF-sobriety and PF-well-filteredness for T_0 spaces, respectively. On the basis of the characterizations, we obtain the following result: PF-sobriety and PF-well-filteredness coincide on the Rudin spaces, which extends the previously established equivalence for locally compact spaces, as every locally compact space is a Rudin space. Furthermore, we give a counterexample to show that for nonempty T_0 topological spaces X and Y, if Y is a PF-well-filtered (PF-sober) space, then the function space consisting of all continuous maps from X to Y equipped with the Isbell topology may not be a PF-well-filtered (PF-sober) space even when X is a core-compact space. We also prove that if the function space comprising all continuous maps from nonempty X to Y endowed with the Isbell topology is PF-well-filtered (PF-sober), then Y is also PF-well-filtered (PF-sober) even though PF-sobriety and PF-well-filteredness are not preserved under retracts. Finally, we show that the reflective hull of the category of PF-well-filtered (PF-sober) spaces with continuous maps in TOP_0 is TOP_0.
ER  -