Nest weave pattern in weaverbirds: a sexual signal selected through sensory drive?
Abstract
Nests are primarily shaped by natural selection, but are also subject to sexual selection. Here, we investigated the potential role of sexual selection in shaping nest visual patterns, focusing on scale-invariance, a property describing how patterns remain similar across spatial scales. In humans, it has been documented that visual patterns are more attractive when their scale-invariance resembles natural habitats, likely because they are more efficiently processed. The underlying mechanism, called processing bias, extends the sensory drive hypothesis from colors to patterns. Applied to birds, processing bias predicts that nests whose scale-invariance matches natural habitats could be sexually selected. We tested this using a comparative analysis of weaverbirds. We quantified the deviation of nest scale-invariance from a range of putative selection optima, then evaluated whether interspecific variation in this deviation is explained by mating system and sexual size dimorphism, two proxies for sexual selection. For both proxies, effect sizes were largest for the same putative optimum, aligning with scale-invariance values in natural habitats. Sexual selection may thus favour nest designs that are efficiently processed, such as those with habitat-like features. Our findings also highlight the challenge of designing a specific test for this hypothesis and call for further research linking pattern perception and sexual selection.
Related
- Transcriptional subtypes, anatomical organization, and sexual dimorphism of sensory vagus neurons in Danionella cerebrum
- Comparative profiling of selected pattern recognition receptor (PRR) pathways reveals functional heterogeneity of monocytic models in the monocyte activation test
- An NKX2-3/5/6 homolog is required downstream of BMP signaling to pattern the sensory-adhesive organ of a tunicate larva
- ARTIFICIAL SELECTION DIVERSIFIES BIRDSONG THROUGH POLYGENIC CHANGES ACROSS SENSORY AND MOTOR SYSTEMS
- Epidermal cells sculpt sensory nerve endings through actomyosin contractility
BibTeX
@article{harscouetcommecy2026nest,
title = {{Nest weave pattern in weaverbirds: a sexual signal selected through sensory drive?}},
author = {Erwan Harscouet-Commecy and Olivier Penacchio and Hans-Dieter Oschadleus and Pierre Colençon and Matthieu Pelte and Paul Dufour and Staffan Andersson and Rita Covas and Julien Renoult and Claire Doutrelant},
journal = {Evolution - International Journal of Organic Evolution},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1093/evolut/qpaf252},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05433014v2},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Nest weave pattern in weaverbirds: a sexual signal selected through sensory drive?
AU - Erwan Harscouet-Commecy
AU - Olivier Penacchio
AU - Hans-Dieter Oschadleus
AU - Pierre Colençon
AU - Matthieu Pelte
AU - Paul Dufour
AU - Staffan Andersson
AU - Rita Covas
AU - Julien Renoult
AU - Claire Doutrelant
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/07
JO - Evolution - International Journal of Organic Evolution
DO - 10.1093/evolut/qpaf252
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05433014v2
AB - Nests are primarily shaped by natural selection, but are also subject to sexual selection. Here, we investigated the potential role of sexual selection in shaping nest visual patterns, focusing on scale-invariance, a property describing how patterns remain similar across spatial scales. In humans, it has been documented that visual patterns are more attractive when their scale-invariance resembles natural habitats, likely because they are more efficiently processed. The underlying mechanism, called processing bias, extends the sensory drive hypothesis from colors to patterns. Applied to birds, processing bias predicts that nests whose scale-invariance matches natural habitats could be sexually selected. We tested this using a comparative analysis of weaverbirds. We quantified the deviation of nest scale-invariance from a range of putative selection optima, then evaluated whether interspecific variation in this deviation is explained by mating system and sexual size dimorphism, two proxies for sexual selection. For both proxies, effect sizes were largest for the same putative optimum, aligning with scale-invariance values in natural habitats. Sexual selection may thus favour nest designs that are efficiently processed, such as those with habitat-like features. Our findings also highlight the challenge of designing a specific test for this hypothesis and call for further research linking pattern perception and sexual selection.
SN - 0014-3820
SN - 1558-5646
ER -