Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

Corticosteroid-refractory checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in lung cancer: biological heterogeneity and mechanism-informed management

  1. 1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University
  2. 2Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of lung cancer, but checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) remains a potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse event. A subset of patients fails to improve despite adequate glucocorticoid therapy and develops corticosteroid-refractory CIP, which is associated with respiratory failure, substantial mortality, and considerable therapeutic uncertainty. This review critically examines the clinical definition, phenotypic characteristics, immunological mechanisms, and therapeutic evidence for corticosteroid-refractory CIP. Emerging data suggest that refractoriness should not be regarded as a uniform failure of glucocorticoid treatment, but rather as a biologically heterogeneous and dynamically evolving syndrome involving persistent tissue-resident T-cell activation, inflammatory T-cell–myeloid crosstalk, cytokine-network redundancy, innate immune dysregulation, and, in some patients, transition toward maladaptive tissue repair and structural lung remodeling. Current second-line treatments, including mycophenolate mofetil, infliximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, tocilizumab, cyclophosphamide, and calcineurin inhibitors, are supported predominantly by retrospective studies and case-report and case-series evidence, with no established optimal treatment sequence. We therefore propose a hypothesis-generating phenotype-to-therapy framework that distinguishes lymphocyte-dominant, cytokine-dominant, fulminant acute lung injury/diffuse alveolar damage, innate/myeloid-dominant, and organizing/fibrotic-remodeling phenotypes while recognizing their potential overlap and temporal evolution. Translating this framework into clinical practice will require harmonized definitions, longitudinal multimodal phenotyping, treatment-predictive biomarkers, and prospective comparative studies. Ultimately, management should move beyond empirical escalation of immunosuppression toward identifying the dominant biological process at a given disease stage and matching treatment intensity and mechanism accordingly.

Related

  1. Clinical, Radiologic, and Highest-Grade Assessment of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Felipe Soto, Muhammad Ali Anees, Saadia A. Faiz +2
    Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. 1027 Foundation-model-based CT detection of pneumonitis-compatible abnormalities during immune checkpoint inhibitor surveillance
    Stéphane Sanchez, Jan Chrusciel, Arya Amini +13
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyDOAJ
  3. Risk Factors for Pneumonitis in Patients with Unresectable Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
    Taisuke Isono, Akihiro Ishida, Yoko Onodera +8
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyJ-STAGE
  4. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Pneumonitis in Patients Treated for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    Jack Masur, Abhishek Mullapudi, Soham Ali +10
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  5. Influenza A (H1N1) virus infection complicated by checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis: A case report.
    Yifan Cheng, Huiying Zhao, Youzhong An
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026corticosteroidrefractory,
  title = {{Corticosteroid-refractory checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in lung cancer: biological heterogeneity and mechanism-informed management}},
  author = {Rong Zhang and Xiaoxue Zhang and Xiulan He and Min Xiang},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1983756},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1983756/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Corticosteroid-refractory checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in lung cancer: biological heterogeneity and mechanism-informed management
AU  - Rong Zhang
AU  - Xiaoxue Zhang
AU  - Xiulan He
AU  - Min Xiang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1983756
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1983756/full
AB  - Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of lung cancer, but checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) remains a potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse event. A subset of patients fails to improve despite adequate glucocorticoid therapy and develops corticosteroid-refractory CIP, which is associated with respiratory failure, substantial mortality, and considerable therapeutic uncertainty. This review critically examines the clinical definition, phenotypic characteristics, immunological mechanisms, and therapeutic evidence for corticosteroid-refractory CIP. Emerging data suggest that refractoriness should not be regarded as a uniform failure of glucocorticoid treatment, but rather as a biologically heterogeneous and dynamically evolving syndrome involving persistent tissue-resident T-cell activation, inflammatory T-cell–myeloid crosstalk, cytokine-network redundancy, innate immune dysregulation, and, in some patients, transition toward maladaptive tissue repair and structural lung remodeling. Current second-line treatments, including mycophenolate mofetil, infliximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, tocilizumab, cyclophosphamide, and calcineurin inhibitors, are supported predominantly by retrospective studies and case-report and case-series evidence, with no established optimal treatment sequence. We therefore propose a hypothesis-generating phenotype-to-therapy framework that distinguishes lymphocyte-dominant, cytokine-dominant, fulminant acute lung injury/diffuse alveolar damage, innate/myeloid-dominant, and organizing/fibrotic-remodeling phenotypes while recognizing their potential overlap and temporal evolution. Translating this framework into clinical practice will require harmonized definitions, longitudinal multimodal phenotyping, treatment-predictive biomarkers, and prospective comparative studies. Ultimately, management should move beyond empirical escalation of immunosuppression toward identifying the dominant biological process at a given disease stage and matching treatment intensity and mechanism accordingly.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -