Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Agronomy for Sustainable Development

Towards robust agroecological market-gardening systems: lessons from a system experiment in crop diversification

Abstract

Farming systems are facing strong disturbances due to climate change, mounting pressure from pests and diseases, and economic and market crises. Increasing crop diversification promises to improve system robustness by reducing and spreading out crops’ exposure to hazards, mitigating their vulnerability if exposed, and thus preserving their performance. Vegetable crops face severe biotic and abiotic stresses. In southern France, most medium-sized market-gardening farms still rely on specialized and lettuce-centered winter cropping systems, compromising long-term field potential and robustness. Many other species are agronomically feasible, but farmers face numerous impediments to significantly diversifying their winter systems. Providing results from agronomic field trials of contrasted diversification options can help overcome these obstacles. Few system experiments target market-gardening cropping systems, and even fewer evaluate strategies of crop diversification combined with other agroecological levers. This article presents the system experiment DIVEGFOOD, implemented in the French Mediterranean region to assess three agroecological diversified cropping systems and a poorly diversified baseline. DIVEGFOOD provided an original assessment of connection between diversification levels and robustness of agroecological market-gardening systems. Diversified systems still tend to be exposed to biotic pressure and injuries to harvests, but less so than the baseline, and to be less exposed to non-optimal conditions. Their production was preserved or improved on average, although some trade-offs had to be accepted for agroeconomic outputs. As it involved complex agroecological systems, DIVEGFOOD illustrated how crop diversification design and assessment require time, trade-offs and a systemic approach. We discuss why this pluriannual system experiment is emblematic of agroecologists’ methodological challenge to design and test promising systems in consistent farming conditions, using relevant assessment and analysis methods. Systems design and outcomes are discussed beyond the single technical field level, highlighting the leeway that could be opened by better dialogue between production and supply chain stakeholders, to support the agroecological transition.

Related

  1. A multi-scale tool to facilitate knowledge sharing and the adoption of agroecological practices for the diversification of cropping systems
    Safia Médiène, Frédérique Angevin, Guénaëlle Hellou +7
    Agronomie, Environnement & SociétésPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyHAL
  2. Innovation processes for the agroecological transition in Maya milpa systems
    José Bernardino Castillo-Caamal, Bernard Triomphe, Jesús Francisco Escalante-Euán +4
    Revista Mexicana de AgroecosistemasPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral biologyHAL
  3. Agroecological sheep farming systems in the Ile-de-France region: Assessment of micropollutant contamination in fodder and ewe blood, milk and urine
    Gaud Dervilly, Petru Jitaru, Delphine Rousseau-Ralliard +5
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral biologyGeneral chemistryHAL
  4. Carbon sequestration-related traits of spontaneous flora under agroecological intensification in European cropping systems
    Elena Testani, Skaidre Suproniene, Akin Un +13
    Agriculture, Ecosystems & EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Traits and hidden states: is self-fertilization associated with rates of diversification across mating and sexual systems?
    E. M. Meyer, M. S. Rosenberg, B. M. Boyd +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull text1 citedEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{lefevre2026towards,
  title = {{Towards robust agroecological market-gardening systems: lessons from a system experiment in crop diversification}},
  author = {Amélie Lefèvre and Léa Husson and Laure Parès and Benjamin Perrin},
  journal = {Agronomy for Sustainable Development},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1007/s13593-026-01144-4},
  url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05761310v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Towards robust agroecological market-gardening systems: lessons from a system experiment in crop diversification
AU  - Amélie Lefèvre
AU  - Léa Husson
AU  - Laure Parès
AU  - Benjamin Perrin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/23
JO  - Agronomy for Sustainable Development
DO  - 10.1007/s13593-026-01144-4
UR  - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05761310v1
AB  - Farming systems are facing strong disturbances due to climate change, mounting pressure from pests and diseases, and economic and market crises. Increasing crop diversification promises to improve system robustness by reducing and spreading out crops’ exposure to hazards, mitigating their vulnerability if exposed, and thus preserving their performance. Vegetable crops face severe biotic and abiotic stresses. In southern France, most medium-sized market-gardening farms still rely on specialized and lettuce-centered winter cropping systems, compromising long-term field potential and robustness. Many other species are agronomically feasible, but farmers face numerous impediments to significantly diversifying their winter systems. Providing results from agronomic field trials of contrasted diversification options can help overcome these obstacles. Few system experiments target market-gardening cropping systems, and even fewer evaluate strategies of crop diversification combined with other agroecological levers. This article presents the system experiment DIVEGFOOD, implemented in the French Mediterranean region to assess three agroecological diversified cropping systems and a poorly diversified baseline. DIVEGFOOD provided an original assessment of connection between diversification levels and robustness of agroecological market-gardening systems. Diversified systems still tend to be exposed to biotic pressure and injuries to harvests, but less so than the baseline, and to be less exposed to non-optimal conditions. Their production was preserved or improved on average, although some trade-offs had to be accepted for agroeconomic outputs. As it involved complex agroecological systems, DIVEGFOOD illustrated how crop diversification design and assessment require time, trade-offs and a systemic approach. We discuss why this pluriannual system experiment is emblematic of agroecologists’ methodological challenge to design and test promising systems in consistent farming conditions, using relevant assessment and analysis methods. Systems design and outcomes are discussed beyond the single technical field level, highlighting the leeway that could be opened by better dialogue between production and supply chain stakeholders, to support the agroecological transition.
SN  - 1774-0746
SN  - 1773-0155
ER  -