GECKO-A v1.0: exploring VOC oxidation trajectories through comparison with the master chemical mechanism
4 affiliations
- 1Université Paris-Est Créteil (Créteil, France)
- 2Université Paris Cité (Paris, France)
- 3Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Paris, France)
- 4Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (Créteil, France)
Abstract
Numerical models are crucial tools for understanding complex chemical systems such as the atmosphere, and their sensitivity across a range of conditions. In atmospheric chemistry models, reaction mechanisms are used to represent chemical transformations and define the underlying system of equations. Building highly explicit mechanisms that capture the full complexity of organic oxidation occurring in the atmosphere remains challenging owing to the large number of intermediates involved, the breadth of reaction pathways, and the limited availability of reliable kinetic and thermodynamic data. The Generator for Explicit Chemistry and Kinetics of Organics in the Atmosphere (GECKO-A) was developed to address these limitations by enabling the systematic construction of near-explicit mechanisms. Here, we present its first open-source release (v1.0), which incorporates updated chemical protocols and structure-activity relationships, together with its companion box model for mechanism integration. GECKO-A's performance is benchmarked through systematic comparisons with the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM v3.3.1), based on simulations of the oxidation of five representative hydrocarbons (butane, octane, dodecane, toluene, and α -pinene) under environmental conditions ranging from urban to remote. The two approaches yield similar oxidation pathways for small and structurally simple compounds. However, differences increase with the size and complexity of the carbon backbone. In particular, the simplifications inherent to the MCM tend to limit the formation of multifunctional products and promote earlier fragmentation, resulting in notable discrepancies in the predicted volatility of secondary organic carbon and, consequently, in secondary organic aerosol yields. These discrepancies stem from how each mechanism treats multigenerational oxidation. The two approaches remain similar for early-generation products, but diverge as later generations become predominant. This divergence also extends to the water solubility of secondary organic carbon, and to its partitioning into aqueous condensed phases. GECKO-A also enables mechanism generation at different levels of chemical resolution. A reduced mechanism, denoted red-GECKO-A, is compared to the high-resolution mechanism used throughout this study. It closely reproduces the simulated oxidative trajectories for most parent compounds and scenarios. Discrepancies emerge for octane and dodecane under NO x -poor conditions.
Versions
Related
- Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from the Gas-Phase Oxidation of Myrtenal by NO 3 Radicals: SOA Yields, Chemical Composition, and Highly Oxygenated Molecules (HOMs) †
- Novel Mechanism of Abiotic Ammonium Oxidation Triggers Nitrous Oxide Bursts Upon Soil Rewetting
- Oxidation mechanism of Ce(III) to Ce(IV) by δ-MnO2: Insights from EXAFS spectroscopy and density functional theory
- Mechanisms of Ultrasound‐Assisted In Situ Chemical Oxidation for Groundwater Remediation: A Laboratory‐Scale Column Study
- Comparison and spatial heterogeneity of eco-efficiency in two major river basins of China: nonlinear mechanism analysis based on spatial machine learning
BibTeX
@article{aumont2026geckoa,
title = {{GECKO-A v1.0: exploring VOC oxidation trajectories through comparison with the master chemical mechanism}},
author = {Bernard Aumont and Richard Valorso and Andrew Rickard and Mike Jenkin and Julia Lee-Taylor and John Orlando and Sasha Madronich and Luc Vereecken and Marie Camredon},
journal = {Geoscientific Model Development},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.5194/gmd-19-10395-2026},
url = {https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/10395/2026/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - GECKO-A v1.0: exploring VOC oxidation trajectories through comparison with the master chemical mechanism
AU - Bernard Aumont
AU - Richard Valorso
AU - Andrew Rickard
AU - Mike Jenkin
AU - Julia Lee-Taylor
AU - John Orlando
AU - Sasha Madronich
AU - Luc Vereecken
AU - Marie Camredon
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
JO - Geoscientific Model Development
DO - 10.5194/gmd-19-10395-2026
UR - https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/10395/2026/
AB - Numerical models are crucial tools for understanding complex chemical systems such as the atmosphere, and their sensitivity across a range of conditions. In atmospheric chemistry models, reaction mechanisms are used to represent chemical transformations and define the underlying system of equations. Building highly explicit mechanisms that capture the full complexity of organic oxidation occurring in the atmosphere remains challenging owing to the large number of intermediates involved, the breadth of reaction pathways, and the limited availability of reliable kinetic and thermodynamic data. The Generator for Explicit Chemistry and Kinetics of Organics in the Atmosphere (GECKO-A) was developed to address these limitations by enabling the systematic construction of near-explicit mechanisms. Here, we present its first open-source release (v1.0), which incorporates updated chemical protocols and structure-activity relationships, together with its companion box model for mechanism integration. GECKO-A's performance is benchmarked through systematic comparisons with the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM v3.3.1), based on simulations of the oxidation of five representative hydrocarbons (butane, octane, dodecane, toluene, and α -pinene) under environmental conditions ranging from urban to remote. The two approaches yield similar oxidation pathways for small and structurally simple compounds. However, differences increase with the size and complexity of the carbon backbone. In particular, the simplifications inherent to the MCM tend to limit the formation of multifunctional products and promote earlier fragmentation, resulting in notable discrepancies in the predicted volatility of secondary organic carbon and, consequently, in secondary organic aerosol yields. These discrepancies stem from how each mechanism treats multigenerational oxidation. The two approaches remain similar for early-generation products, but diverge as later generations become predominant. This divergence also extends to the water solubility of secondary organic carbon, and to its partitioning into aqueous condensed phases. GECKO-A also enables mechanism generation at different levels of chemical resolution. A reduced mechanism, denoted red-GECKO-A, is compared to the high-resolution mechanism used throughout this study. It closely reproduces the simulated oxidative trajectories for most parent compounds and scenarios. Discrepancies emerge for octane and dodecane under NO x -poor conditions.
SN - 1991-9603
ER -