Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in Forests and Global Change

Spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of forest ecosystem service value in China based on the equivalent factor method

  1. 1College of Business Administration, Fujian Business University, Fuzhou, China
  2. 2College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China

Abstract

IntroductionTo assess forest ecosystem service value (FESV) in China and support ecological conservation and high-quality forest ecosystem development, this study examined FESV from 2000 to 2023 from a geographical perspective.MethodsThe equivalent factor method was applied with coefficient adjustments at the provincial and county levels. County-level FESV estimates were aggregated to obtain provincial and national estimates for each year, and the center-of-gravity model, standard deviational ellipse, and Geodetector were used for analysis.ResultsThe results showed that: (1) FESV in China followed an overall upward trend with fluctuations, increasing by 12% from 2000 to 2023. Regulating services accounted for the largest share, exceeding 66% in every year. (2) Total FESV was highest in western China, which accounted for more than 46% of the national total on average over the study period. Central and northeastern China occupied intermediate positions, while eastern China had the lowest total FESV. FESV per unit forest ecosystem area was highest in eastern China, while central China generally ranked second, with relatively lower values in northeastern and western China. Provinces in the highest FESV class (Level 5) were mainly located in western and northeastern China, and their number increased from two to four. The distribution of low-value provinces remained relatively stable. (3) The spatial distribution of FESV exhibited an overall northeast–southwest orientation, with a relatively stable distributional shape. The center of gravity remained within Henan Province and shifted predominantly northward, with a slight eastward component. Its locations in 2000 and 2023 were 88.42 km apart. (4) Among the natural factors selected in this study, slope and elevation had the greatest explanatory power for the spatial variation in FESV within the Geodetector framework. All pairwise factor interactions exhibited either bivariate enhancement or nonlinear enhancement in each representative year.DiscussionThese findings can inform the spatial allocation of forest resources and the formulation of ecological conservation and management policies.

Related

  1. Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem service values under land use and land cover change in selected districts Hadiya zone, Central Ethiopian Region
    Tamirat Egiso, Kitessa Hundera Geleta, Zerihun Kebebew +1
    Discover SustainabilityPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
  2. Spatiotemporal patterns and bivariate spatial correlation of ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk in karst mountainous Guizhou, southwest China
    Zhuyan Yu, Tianyu Zhao, Shiyu Qu +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Climate scienceCrossref
  3. Unraveling nonlinear ecosystem water use efficiency dynamics and environmental drivers across Iran using remote sensing and XGBoost-SHAP
    Majid Kazemzadeh
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
  4. Spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of bare soil albedo in European croplands
    Ke Yu, Yang Su, Philippe Ciais +7
    BiogeosciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Geology & geochemistryCrossref
  5. A geospatial and community perception analysis of the impacts of land use and land cover change on ecosystem service values
    Md Shafiqul Islam, Tania Yeasmin, Irteja Hasan +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
BibTeX
@article{shi2026spatiotemporal,
  title = {{Spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of forest ecosystem service value in China based on the equivalent factor method}},
  author = {Qi Shi and Chuan Ye},
  journal = {Frontiers in Forests and Global Change},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/ffgc.2026.1956763},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2026.1956763},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of forest ecosystem service value in China based on the equivalent factor method
AU  - Qi Shi
AU  - Chuan Ye
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
DO  - 10.3389/ffgc.2026.1956763
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2026.1956763
AB  - IntroductionTo assess forest ecosystem service value (FESV) in China and support ecological conservation and high-quality forest ecosystem development, this study examined FESV from 2000 to 2023 from a geographical perspective.MethodsThe equivalent factor method was applied with coefficient adjustments at the provincial and county levels. County-level FESV estimates were aggregated to obtain provincial and national estimates for each year, and the center-of-gravity model, standard deviational ellipse, and Geodetector were used for analysis.ResultsThe results showed that: (1) FESV in China followed an overall upward trend with fluctuations, increasing by 12% from 2000 to 2023. Regulating services accounted for the largest share, exceeding 66% in every year. (2) Total FESV was highest in western China, which accounted for more than 46% of the national total on average over the study period. Central and northeastern China occupied intermediate positions, while eastern China had the lowest total FESV. FESV per unit forest ecosystem area was highest in eastern China, while central China generally ranked second, with relatively lower values in northeastern and western China. Provinces in the highest FESV class (Level 5) were mainly located in western and northeastern China, and their number increased from two to four. The distribution of low-value provinces remained relatively stable. (3) The spatial distribution of FESV exhibited an overall northeast–southwest orientation, with a relatively stable distributional shape. The center of gravity remained within Henan Province and shifted predominantly northward, with a slight eastward component. Its locations in 2000 and 2023 were 88.42 km apart. (4) Among the natural factors selected in this study, slope and elevation had the greatest explanatory power for the spatial variation in FESV within the Geodetector framework. All pairwise factor interactions exhibited either bivariate enhancement or nonlinear enhancement in each representative year.DiscussionThese findings can inform the spatial allocation of forest resources and the formulation of ecological conservation and management policies.
SN  - 2624-893X
ER  -