Measured treatment differences between sexes and genders: A scoping review
- 1University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
- 2University of Keele, Newcastle-under-Lyme, United Kingdom
Abstract
Background: Sex and gender-based inequality is found throughout medicine. Although there has been significant research in gender disparities affecting healthcare professionals, there is a lack of research into gender differences in the treatment of patients. Despite recognition of systemic issues, recent empirical evidence on how gender influences actual treatment decisions remains fragmented across specialties. A preliminary search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and JBI (Joanna Briggs institute) Evidence Synthesis was conducted and no current or underway systematic reviews or scoping reviews on the topic were identified. Methods: Studies in English published between 2018 and 2023 were included. Only research which studied measurable differences in the care received by patients of different sexes or genders was included. Both authors independently screened the literature against the a priori defined eligibility criteria. A thematic synthesis approach was used and results summarised qualitatively. Results: Forty-one papers were included in this review. Of the thirty-eight retrospective case series, thirty-three found a significant difference between the treatment of male and female patients. Of the twenty-nine case series using a multivariate analysis, twenty-five studies found a significant difference in treatment between male and female patients. Conclusions: The results of this review indicate that men and women are frequently treated differently by healthcare systems. During 2018–2023, five hundred and fifty-one papers were published which studied gender-based differences in opportunities given to healthcare professionals, but only forty-one studying the treatment given to patients. This highlights an area of unmet research need.
Related
- Artificial Intelligence in Gingival Recession Assessment and Treatment Planning: A Scoping Review
- [Analysis of treatment outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia between different genders].
- Artificial Intelligence-Guided Extracellular Vesicle Platforms for Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review and Future Directions
- Integration of Immune checkpoint inhibitors within the definitive radiotherapy-based treatment continuum for locally advanced mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a scoping review protocol
- Management of HIV-Associated Cancers in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review of Treatment Outcomes, Challenges, and Strategies for Enhancing Care
BibTeX
@article{veenhuizen2026measured,
title = {{Measured treatment differences between sexes and genders: A scoping review}},
author = {Miriam Veenhuizen and Andrew O’Malley},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0356176},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356176},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Measured treatment differences between sexes and genders: A scoping review
AU - Miriam Veenhuizen
AU - Andrew O’Malley
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/16
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0356176
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356176
AB - Background: Sex and gender-based inequality is found throughout medicine. Although there has been significant research in gender disparities affecting healthcare professionals, there is a lack of research into gender differences in the treatment of patients. Despite recognition of systemic issues, recent empirical evidence on how gender influences actual treatment decisions remains fragmented across specialties. A preliminary search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and JBI (Joanna Briggs institute) Evidence Synthesis was conducted and no current or underway systematic reviews or scoping reviews on the topic were identified. Methods: Studies in English published between 2018 and 2023 were included. Only research which studied measurable differences in the care received by patients of different sexes or genders was included. Both authors independently screened the literature against the a priori defined eligibility criteria. A thematic synthesis approach was used and results summarised qualitatively. Results: Forty-one papers were included in this review. Of the thirty-eight retrospective case series, thirty-three found a significant difference between the treatment of male and female patients. Of the twenty-nine case series using a multivariate analysis, twenty-five studies found a significant difference in treatment between male and female patients. Conclusions: The results of this review indicate that men and women are frequently treated differently by healthcare systems. During 2018–2023, five hundred and fifty-one papers were published which studied gender-based differences in opportunities given to healthcare professionals, but only forty-one studying the treatment given to patients. This highlights an area of unmet research need.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -