On the origin of the effect of silent articulation on speech perception
- 1Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain
Abstract
Silent articulation influences the identification of ambiguous speech sounds. This effect has often been attributed to articulatory suppression—the idea that concurrent motor activity prevents the recruitment of motor resources that would normally support speech perception. However, silent articulation also generates motor, somatosensory, auditory, and phonological signals, any of which could potentially contribute to the effect. The objective of the three experiments reported here was to discriminate between articulatory suppression and these other potential origins of the silent-articulation effect on speech perception. To do so, we determined the minimal signal-to-noise ratio at which participants could discriminate between two pairs of syllables (labial/lingual and lingual/lingual) while repetitively moving the finger or performing a lip movement, either opening and closing the lips (Experiment 1), protruding and retracting the lips while keeping them pressed together (Experiment 2) or both (Experiment 3). Categorization performance for the two pairs of syllables during finger movement provided the baseline against which a putative effect of the lip movements on the labial/lingual pair was tested. The two lip movements engaged partly similar motor resources (contraction of the marginal part of the orbicularis oris). Only lip opening engaged motor planning and somatosensory feedback similar to those associated with one of the syllables used in the task. Neither of them engaged auditory or phonological factors. Only lip opening differently influenced the two types of syllables in comparison to the baseline. These findings suggest that our own mouth movements shape what we hear only when they resemble articulatory gestures of possible speech sounds. This challenges explanations based solely on motor-resource depletion or on phonological or auditory imagery and helps clarify how the motor system interacts with, but is not necessarily required for, speech perception.
Related
- Between arteries, silent but possibly deadly: late presentation of a high-risk anomalous origin of a coronary artery
- Age-specific agreement between Hi-DongDong and UTAP-2 articulation assessments in Korean children aged 2–13 years
- When Appearances Deceive: A Silent Somatotroph Macroadenoma Presenting With Acromegaloid Features and Paradoxically Low Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1
- Editorial: The silent stigma: the intersections of ageing with HIV
- The silent risk: Occult Hepatitis B virus detected in Cornea donors.
BibTeX
@article{pereira2026origin,
title = {{On the origin of the effect of silent articulation on speech perception}},
author = {Sarah Carneiro Pereira and Jean-François Patri and Gilles Vannuscorps},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-63240-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63240-5},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - On the origin of the effect of silent articulation on speech perception
AU - Sarah Carneiro Pereira
AU - Jean-François Patri
AU - Gilles Vannuscorps
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-63240-5
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63240-5
AB - Silent articulation influences the identification of ambiguous speech sounds. This effect has often been attributed to articulatory suppression—the idea that concurrent motor activity prevents the recruitment of motor resources that would normally support speech perception. However, silent articulation also generates motor, somatosensory, auditory, and phonological signals, any of which could potentially contribute to the effect. The objective of the three experiments reported here was to discriminate between articulatory suppression and these other potential origins of the silent-articulation effect on speech perception. To do so, we determined the minimal signal-to-noise ratio at which participants could discriminate between two pairs of syllables (labial/lingual and lingual/lingual) while repetitively moving the finger or performing a lip movement, either opening and closing the lips (Experiment 1), protruding and retracting the lips while keeping them pressed together (Experiment 2) or both (Experiment 3). Categorization performance for the two pairs of syllables during finger movement provided the baseline against which a putative effect of the lip movements on the labial/lingual pair was tested. The two lip movements engaged partly similar motor resources (contraction of the marginal part of the orbicularis oris). Only lip opening engaged motor planning and somatosensory feedback similar to those associated with one of the syllables used in the task. Neither of them engaged auditory or phonological factors. Only lip opening differently influenced the two types of syllables in comparison to the baseline. These findings suggest that our own mouth movements shape what we hear only when they resemble articulatory gestures of possible speech sounds. This challenges explanations based solely on motor-resource depletion or on phonological or auditory imagery and helps clarify how the motor system interacts with, but is not necessarily required for, speech perception.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -