From rock and ice to political convenience: persistent biases in Argentina’s protected areas
5 affiliations
- 1GeoBio, Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IDEA-CONICET), Argentina; Fac. de Cs. Exactas Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Argentina
- 2Red Biología Evolutiva, Laboratorio de Bioclimatología, Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Xalapa, Veracruz, México
- 3Grupo de Estudios Ambientales, Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis - Universidad Nacional de San Luis & CONICET, San Luis, D5700HHW, Argentina
- 4Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1DB, United Kingdom
- 5GeoBio, Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IDEA-CONICET), Argentina; Fac. de Cs. Exactas Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Argentina; Corresponding author:
Abstract
Protected areas (PAs) are one of the central tools to achieve international conservation targets toward 2030, yet biases in their location often undermine their effectiveness. A recurrent pattern worldwide is the tendency to establish PAs in remote or marginal lands, the so-called “residual conservation” or “rock and ice problem”. While elevation has been widely studied as a driver of this bias, other key topographic dimensions have received far less attention. Here we compared altitude, slope, and irregularity within Argentinian PAs against national, local, and ecoregional baselines, and examined their variation with the year of establishment and IUCN category. Our results show that Argentine PAs are disproportionately located in higher, steeper, and more irregular environments, with these biases being most pronounced in strictly protected categories. Protection increases sharply above 2000 m, in slopes steeper than 27 °, and in rugged terrains, while fertile and accessible lowlands remain largely underrepresented. These biases show little evidence of having changed substantially through time, despite Argentina’s international commitments on biological representativeness. Overcoming these long-standing topographic biases to truly meet the international agenda will require moving beyond economically convenient expansions and strategically directing protection toward the current deficits of the system, even when this implies political conflict.
Related
- Protected areas: questioning the development-conservation system. A socio-political-economic and ecological framework for a bottom-up approach
- Riding a phantom: Rudderfish (Centrolophus niger) with a giant deep‐sea jellyfish (Stygiomedusa gigantea) off Argentina
- Lipid peroxidation in Spartina alterniflora in relation to anthropogenic particles (APs) and sediment conditions in the Bahía Blanca Estuary, Argentina
- Strategies for Mitigating the Impact of Ionospheric and Tropospheric Delay on Sentinel‐1 Interferograms in Northwestern Argentina
- Microplastics at the 'roof of the Americas': widespread presence in snow on Mount Aconcagua, Central Andes, Argentina.
BibTeX
@article{tomba2026from,
title = {{From rock and ice to political convenience: persistent biases in Argentina’s protected areas}},
author = {Ana N. Tomba and Octavio Rojas-Soto and Mauricio Díaz-Vallejo and Germán Baldi and Javier Fajardo and Javier Nori},
journal = {Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.pecon.2026.07.001},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2026.07.001},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - From rock and ice to political convenience: persistent biases in Argentina’s protected areas
AU - Ana N. Tomba
AU - Octavio Rojas-Soto
AU - Mauricio Díaz-Vallejo
AU - Germán Baldi
AU - Javier Fajardo
AU - Javier Nori
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
DO - 10.1016/j.pecon.2026.07.001
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2026.07.001
AB - Protected areas (PAs) are one of the central tools to achieve international conservation targets toward 2030, yet biases in their location often undermine their effectiveness. A recurrent pattern worldwide is the tendency to establish PAs in remote or marginal lands, the so-called “residual conservation” or “rock and ice problem”. While elevation has been widely studied as a driver of this bias, other key topographic dimensions have received far less attention. Here we compared altitude, slope, and irregularity within Argentinian PAs against national, local, and ecoregional baselines, and examined their variation with the year of establishment and IUCN category. Our results show that Argentine PAs are disproportionately located in higher, steeper, and more irregular environments, with these biases being most pronounced in strictly protected categories. Protection increases sharply above 2000 m, in slopes steeper than 27 °, and in rugged terrains, while fertile and accessible lowlands remain largely underrepresented. These biases show little evidence of having changed substantially through time, despite Argentina’s international commitments on biological representativeness. Overcoming these long-standing topographic biases to truly meet the international agenda will require moving beyond economically convenient expansions and strategically directing protection toward the current deficits of the system, even when this implies political conflict.
SN - 2530-0644
ER -