Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-SA 4.0NOV'AE - Numéros spéciaux

Ethics in research projects: a shift in scale toward operational ethics

  • Claire Lurin
Open at sourcePDFDOICite

Abstract

Ethical reflection in the context of research projects is essential to consider the impacts of research. INRAE has developed tools to support this reflection, thereby meeting the demands of researchers, institutions, and society. The two resources—a self-assessment ethical questionnaire and an ethics committee for research projects—enable scientists to autonomously analyse their projects, and to obtain an independent ethics assessment. The questionnaire thus promotes critical self-analysis, while the ethics committee issues recommendations and opinions. The proposed approach extends reflection beyond traditional considerations regarding the involvement of individuals or animals in experiments, and includes in particular an analysis of the consequences of projects in terms of their impact on society, the environment, and ecosystems.

Related

  1. Collective interests, health research ethics and data governance for Indigenous Sámi populations
    Susanna Ragnhild Andersdatter Siri, Christina Storm Mienna, Per Axelsson
    PLOS MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textZoology & animal behaviourPLOS
  2. Towards operational epidemiology of Pyricularia oryzae in sports turf: contribution of a multi-matrix molecular monitoring strategy at stadium scale
    S. Saadi, C. Gruet, H. Adreit +4
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPlant biologybioRxiv
  3. Daring to leave the laboratory: Why operational neuroscience requires a different research strategy
    Jerome I. Rotgans
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  4. Phenotype shift scores reveal the scale and phylogenetic structure of phenotypic differentiation in primates.
    F. Barteri, A. Navarro, O. E. Cornejo
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  5. A two-stage RAG-LLM pipeline for roadmapping neuroscience research in operational environments.
    Cara A Spencer
    Frontiers in human neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCPMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{lurin2026ethics,
  title = {{Ethics in research projects: a shift in scale toward operational ethics}},
  author = {Claire Lurin},
  journal = {NOV'AE - Numéros spéciaux},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.20870/revue-novae.2025.9685},
  url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05854581v1},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Ethics in research projects: a shift in scale toward operational ethics
AU  - Claire Lurin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/06
JO  - NOV'AE - Numéros spéciaux
DO  - 10.20870/revue-novae.2025.9685
UR  - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05854581v1
AB  - Ethical reflection in the context of research projects is essential to consider the impacts of research. INRAE has developed tools to support this reflection, thereby meeting the demands of researchers, institutions, and society. The two resources—a self-assessment ethical questionnaire and an ethics committee for research projects—enable scientists to autonomously analyse their projects, and to obtain an independent ethics assessment. The questionnaire thus promotes critical self-analysis, while the ethics committee issues recommendations and opinions. The proposed approach extends reflection beyond traditional considerations regarding the involvement of individuals or animals in experiments, and includes in particular an analysis of the consequences of projects in terms of their impact on society, the environment, and ecosystems.
SN  - 2823-2283
SN  - 2823-3980
ER  -