Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The Astrophysical Journal

Black Hole Supernovae Outcomes Across a Wide Progenitor Range

  1. 1Stockholm University
  2. 2Michigan State University

Abstract

Black hole supernovae (BHSNe), the term we use for core-collapse events in which black hole (BH) formation occurs after shock revival but before the explosion is complete, have emerged as a natural outcome of multidimensional simulations as these calculations have been extended to seconds after bounce. Yet they remain one of the least studied outcomes of core collapse. Here, we assess whether they are confined to the most compact and massive progenitors, whose birth rates are low, or whether they arise systematically across a wider range of progenitor structures. We perform 23 long-term axisymmetric core-collapse simulations of progenitors spanning 19.51–60 M ⊙ and compactnesses 0.31 ≲ ξ 2.5 ≲ 0.63. We find 18 BHSN outcomes across nearly the full ZAMS mass range considered, corresponding to progenitors with 0.40 ≲ ξ 2.5 ≲ 0.63. BH formation occurs between ∼0.7 s and ∼4.7 s after bounce. After BH formation, we continue the evolution with an excision treatment to at least 5000 s. The final explosion energies span ∼2 × 10 ⁴⁹ –3 × 10 ⁵¹ erg, while the final BH gravitational masses span ∼3–26 M ⊙ . We find a clear remnant-mass trend with CO-core mass, but show that the CO core alone is not an adequate proxy for the final BH mass, especially for progenitors at the low- and high-mass ends of the CO-core distribution. Except for the highest CO-core mass models, no single spherical mass coordinate cleanly separates ejecta from remnant material. Finally, a 2D axisymmetric and a 3D model are compared as we discuss differences between the two geometries.

Related

  1. Gravitational Waves from Core-Collapse Supernovae: Dependence on the Progenitor Star, Rotation Rate and Nuclear Equation of State
    Jade Powell, Bailey Sykes, Bernhard Müller
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy astrophysicsarXiv
  2. The plunging region of thin accretion discs across the black hole spin range
    Jake Rule, Andrew Mummery, Steven Balbus +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsarXiv
  3. The plunging region of thin accretion discs across the black hole spin range
    Jake Rule, Andrew Mummery, Steven Balbus +2
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  4. Galaxy merger-driven signatures in massive black hole pair hosts across cosmic time
    Pranav Satheesh, Aklant K. Bhowmick, Laura Blecha
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
  5. Across the Universe: GW231123 as a Magnified and Diffracted Black Hole Merger
    Srashti Goyal, Hector Villarrubia-Rojo, Miguel Zumalacárregui
    The Astrophysical Journal LettersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text35 citedHigh-energy astrophysicsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{andersen2026black,
  title = {{Black Hole Supernovae Outcomes Across a Wide Progenitor Range}},
  author = {Oliver Eggenberger Andersen and Evan O’Connor and Liubov Kovalenko and Haakon Andresen and Sean M. Couch},
  journal = {The Astrophysical Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aeaa45},
  url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aeaa45},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Black Hole Supernovae Outcomes Across a Wide Progenitor Range
AU  - Oliver Eggenberger Andersen
AU  - Evan O’Connor
AU  - Liubov Kovalenko
AU  - Haakon Andresen
AU  - Sean M. Couch
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
JO  - The Astrophysical Journal
DO  - 10.3847/1538-4357/aeaa45
UR  - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aeaa45
AB  - Black hole supernovae (BHSNe), the term we use for core-collapse events in which black hole (BH) formation occurs after shock revival but before the explosion is complete, have emerged as a natural outcome of multidimensional simulations as these calculations have been extended to seconds after bounce. Yet they remain one of the least studied outcomes of core collapse. Here, we assess whether they are confined to the most compact and massive progenitors, whose birth rates are low, or whether they arise systematically across a wider range of progenitor structures. We perform 23 long-term axisymmetric core-collapse simulations of progenitors spanning 19.51–60 M ⊙ and compactnesses 0.31 ≲ ξ 2.5 ≲ 0.63. We find 18 BHSN outcomes across nearly the full ZAMS mass range considered, corresponding to progenitors with 0.40 ≲ ξ 2.5 ≲ 0.63. BH formation occurs between ∼0.7 s and ∼4.7 s after bounce. After BH formation, we continue the evolution with an excision treatment to at least 5000 s. The final explosion energies span ∼2 × 10 ⁴⁹ –3 × 10 ⁵¹ erg, while the final BH gravitational masses span ∼3–26 M ⊙ . We find a clear remnant-mass trend with CO-core mass, but show that the CO core alone is not an adequate proxy for the final BH mass, especially for progenitors at the low- and high-mass ends of the CO-core distribution. Except for the highest CO-core mass models, no single spherical mass coordinate cleanly separates ejecta from remnant material. Finally, a 2D axisymmetric and a 3D model are compared as we discuss differences between the two geometries.
SN  - 1538-4357
SN  - 0004-637X
ER  -