Myeloid-Adaptive Response to Atezolizumab (MARTA): A Two-Gene CXCL13–CXCL8 Transcriptomic Biomarker Across Renal Cell and Urothelial Carcinoma
- 1Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
Abstract
Transcriptomic response biomarkers for immune-checkpoint blockade remain poorly defined across cancers. We developed the two-gene Myeloid-Adaptive Response to Atezolizumab (MARTA) score, integrating CXCL13 and CXCL8 expression. MARTA was developed in 81 atezolizumab-treated patients in IMmotion150, evaluated across treatment groups, and independently assessed in IMvigor210. In IMmotion150, higher MARTA was associated with higher objective response rate (ORR) with atezolizumab alone (odds ratio [OR], 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42–7.19) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.43–4.76), but not with sunitinib. Higher MARTA was associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) in both atezolizumab-containing groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60 and 0.65), but not with sunitinib (interaction p = 0.01). In IMvigor210, higher MARTA was associated with higher ORR (OR per 1-standard-deviation increase, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.05–1.81) and longer overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.86). The OS association remained after multivariate adjustment (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69–0.95). Discrimination for ORR and OS, assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) and C-index, respectively, was modest for MARTA, tGE8, and the IFN-γ signature. These findings support further evaluation of MARTA, while prospective validation and cross-platform analytical reproducibility remain necessary before clinical application.
Related
- Multiplexed FRET-FLIM Profiling of Immune Checkpoint Interactions Predicts Response to Atezolizumab in Urothelial Carcinoma
- A 5-gene mutation signature predicts response to atezolizumab in metastatic bladder urothelial carcinoma.
- Integrated Transcriptomic and Network Analysis Identifies Diagnostic and Immune-Associated Hub Genes in Urothelial Carcinoma
- Advances in Novel Protein Acylation in Urothelial Carcinoma: Research Progress and Biomarker Potential
- Incremental Predictive Value and Representation of Transcriptomic Features for Immunotherapy Response in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
BibTeX
@article{uccello2026myeloidadaptive,
title = {{Myeloid-Adaptive Response to Atezolizumab (MARTA): A Two-Gene CXCL13–CXCL8 Transcriptomic Biomarker Across Renal Cell and Urothelial Carcinoma}},
author = {Mario Uccello},
journal = {Current issues in molecular biology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/cimb48101012},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13703666},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Myeloid-Adaptive Response to Atezolizumab (MARTA): A Two-Gene CXCL13–CXCL8 Transcriptomic Biomarker Across Renal Cell and Urothelial Carcinoma
AU - Mario Uccello
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Current issues in molecular biology
DO - 10.3390/cimb48101012
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13703666
AB - Transcriptomic response biomarkers for immune-checkpoint blockade remain poorly defined across cancers. We developed the two-gene Myeloid-Adaptive Response to Atezolizumab (MARTA) score, integrating CXCL13 and CXCL8 expression. MARTA was developed in 81 atezolizumab-treated patients in IMmotion150, evaluated across treatment groups, and independently assessed in IMvigor210. In IMmotion150, higher MARTA was associated with higher objective response rate (ORR) with atezolizumab alone (odds ratio [OR], 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42–7.19) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.43–4.76), but not with sunitinib. Higher MARTA was associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) in both atezolizumab-containing groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60 and 0.65), but not with sunitinib (interaction p = 0.01). In IMvigor210, higher MARTA was associated with higher ORR (OR per 1-standard-deviation increase, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.05–1.81) and longer overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.86). The OS association remained after multivariate adjustment (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69–0.95). Discrimination for ORR and OS, assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) and C-index, respectively, was modest for MARTA, tGE8, and the IFN-γ signature. These findings support further evaluation of MARTA, while prospective validation and cross-platform analytical reproducibility remain necessary before clinical application.
SN - 1467-3037
SN - 1467-3045
ER -