Reported cardiovascular events and cardiometabolic risk markers with orforglipron and danuglipron in adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Pathology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000 Sichuan China
- 2School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000 Sichuan China
- 3Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000 Sichuan China
- 4Metabolic Vascular Diseases Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Metabolic Vascular Diseases Key Laboratory of Sichuan-Chongqing Cooperation, Luzhou, 646000 Sichuan China
Abstract
Background and objective: To evaluate the effects of orforglipron and danuglipron on cardiovascular events and cardiometabolic risk markers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through May 5, 2026. Two authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Meta-analyses estimated pooled risk ratios (RRs), least-squares mean differences (LSMDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 9,076 participants were included. Compared with controls, orforglipron/danuglipron showed no statistically significant difference in extended major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR = 1.10, 95% CI [0.59 to 2.05], I² = 0.0%, P = 0.760, 6 studies; intervention: 32/4741, control: 13/1928) or myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.06 to 4.60], I² = 0.0%, P = 0.576, 2 studies; intervention: 2/881, control: 0/156). Extended MACE and MI were mainly derived from adverse event reports. Given sparse, indirect event data and low GRADE certainty, these findings warrant caution. In contrast, orforglipron and danuglipron reduced several cardiometabolic risk markers, including HbA1c (LSMD = − 1.07%, 95% CI [− 1.49 to − 0.64], I² = 99.1%, P < 0.001), fasting plasma glucose (LSMD = − 27.75 mg/dL, 95% CI [− 37.99 to − 17.50], I² = 98.2%, P < 0.001), and body weight (LSMD = − 4.68 kg, 95% CI [− 6.26 to − 3.10], I² = 95.4%, P < 0.001). These estimates showed substantial between-study heterogeneity, warranting cautious interpretation. Current randomized evidence supports changes in cardiometabolic risk markers, but uncertainty remains regarding the effects on hard cardiovascular events.
Conclusions: Current randomized evidence suggests that orforglipron and danuglipron reduce short- to medium-term cardiometabolic risk markers in patients with T2DM or obesity. However, no significant differences in extended MACE or MI were observed; the point estimates were imprecise, and cardiovascular effects remain unconfirmed. These findings are limited by sparse events, low-certainty evidence, and the lack of dedicated cardiovascular outcome trial (CVOT) designs; therefore, definitive conclusions regarding cardiovascular effects cannot be drawn.
Trial registration: The study protocol was pre-registered and published on PROSPERO (CRD420251067874; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-026-02264-3.
Related
- PlanetDiet: Sustainable diets and cardiometabolic health, study protocol for a six-month parallel-group randomized controlled trial in middle-aged adults at cardiovascular risk
- Predicting the Long‐Term Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease With Orforglipron in People With Overweight or Obesity: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ATTAIN‐1 Trial
- Effects of different exercise types on visceral adipose tissue and glycemic parameters in adults with stage 1 cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: systematic review of randomized controlled trials
- Escitalopram for psychological symptoms and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BibTeX
@article{zou2026reported,
title = {{Reported cardiovascular events and cardiometabolic risk markers with orforglipron and danuglipron in adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials}},
author = {Guanglan Zou and Cheng Yang and Qi Wu and Man Guo and Yong Liu},
journal = {Diabetology \& Metabolic Syndrome},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s13098-026-02264-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-026-02264-3},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Reported cardiovascular events and cardiometabolic risk markers with orforglipron and danuglipron in adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
AU - Guanglan Zou
AU - Cheng Yang
AU - Qi Wu
AU - Man Guo
AU - Yong Liu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/07
JO - Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
DO - 10.1186/s13098-026-02264-3
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-026-02264-3
AB - Background and objective: To evaluate the effects of orforglipron and danuglipron on cardiovascular events and cardiometabolic risk markers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through May 5, 2026. Two authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Meta-analyses estimated pooled risk ratios (RRs), least-squares mean differences (LSMDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 9,076 participants were included. Compared with controls, orforglipron/danuglipron showed no statistically significant difference in extended major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR = 1.10, 95% CI [0.59 to 2.05], I² = 0.0%, P = 0.760, 6 studies; intervention: 32/4741, control: 13/1928) or myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.06 to 4.60], I² = 0.0%, P = 0.576, 2 studies; intervention: 2/881, control: 0/156). Extended MACE and MI were mainly derived from adverse event reports. Given sparse, indirect event data and low GRADE certainty, these findings warrant caution. In contrast, orforglipron and danuglipron reduced several cardiometabolic risk markers, including HbA1c (LSMD = − 1.07%, 95% CI [− 1.49 to − 0.64], I² = 99.1%, P < 0.001), fasting plasma glucose (LSMD = − 27.75 mg/dL, 95% CI [− 37.99 to − 17.50], I² = 98.2%, P < 0.001), and body weight (LSMD = − 4.68 kg, 95% CI [− 6.26 to − 3.10], I² = 95.4%, P < 0.001). These estimates showed substantial between-study heterogeneity, warranting cautious interpretation. Current randomized evidence supports changes in cardiometabolic risk markers, but uncertainty remains regarding the effects on hard cardiovascular events. Conclusions: Current randomized evidence suggests that orforglipron and danuglipron reduce short- to medium-term cardiometabolic risk markers in patients with T2DM or obesity. However, no significant differences in extended MACE or MI were observed; the point estimates were imprecise, and cardiovascular effects remain unconfirmed. These findings are limited by sparse events, low-certainty evidence, and the lack of dedicated cardiovascular outcome trial (CVOT) designs; therefore, definitive conclusions regarding cardiovascular effects cannot be drawn. Trial registration: The study protocol was pre-registered and published on PROSPERO (CRD420251067874; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/). Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-026-02264-3.
SN - 1758-5996
ER -