Rocks out, waste in: A double penalty in gravel-rich river valleys?
Abstract
Construction and Demolition (CD) waste is the largest solid waste stream in France, yet circular economy (CE) research on this sector tends to privilege technical and quantitative framings over its socio-economic and governance dimensions. This article examines the implementation of CE measures in the gravel-quarrying industry of the Basse-Ariège plain (Occitanie, France), where alluvial aggregates are extracted from the water table and the resulting pits are backfilled with CD waste legally classified as "inert." Drawing on Discard Studies and territorial political ecology, and building on a two-year interdisciplinary and participatory research project (NAPALAIR) combining documentary analysis, 53 semi-structured interviews, and participatory workshops with residents, farmers, quarry operators, and public authorities, we ask who gains and who pays from CE implementation. Our results show that extraction and disposal are structurally coupled through a profitable "double freight" logistics arrangement, and that backfilling is classified as "recovery" through a permissive legal and regulatory regime shaped largely by industry actors themselves. We further show that current leaching standards fail to capture how submersion in groundwater may alter the degradation kinetics of supposedly inert materials. Rather than curbing extraction, CE targets make quarrying more economically viable, producing what we term a double penalty for the host territory: fertile agricultural land is lost to extraction, then exposed to long-term contamination risk from buried waste, while local municipalities receive only marginal economic benefits. We argue that this extraction-discard coupling is not unique to Ariège, offering scope conditions relevant to CE-driven extractivism in comparable resource-rich, waste receiving territories.
Related
- Wave reflections from sub-marine valleys and canyons
- Decoupled morphodynamic responses of dune crests and localized scour across the sand-gravel transition in straight alluvial channels
- River Sand and Gravel Mining: Global Drivers, Impacts, and Pathways for Sustainable Management
- Tracing missing copper: ultrapotassic rocks record isotopic evidence of crustal Cu depletion
- Mechanical controls on the rate of phase transformations in deforming rocks: a numerical study applied to quartz-coesite transformation
BibTeX
@article{cave2026rocks,
title = {{Rocks out, waste in: A double penalty in gravel-rich river valleys?}},
author = {Jérémie Cavé and Hélène Guétat-Bernard and Sylvain Kuppel and Laure Laffont and Léa Sébastien and Astrid Avellan},
journal = {Environmental Science \& Policy},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104467},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05753693v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Rocks out, waste in: A double penalty in gravel-rich river valleys?
AU - Jérémie Cavé
AU - Hélène Guétat-Bernard
AU - Sylvain Kuppel
AU - Laure Laffont
AU - Léa Sébastien
AU - Astrid Avellan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/18
JO - Environmental Science & Policy
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104467
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05753693v1
AB - Construction and Demolition (CD) waste is the largest solid waste stream in France, yet circular economy (CE) research on this sector tends to privilege technical and quantitative framings over its socio-economic and governance dimensions. This article examines the implementation of CE measures in the gravel-quarrying industry of the Basse-Ariège plain (Occitanie, France), where alluvial aggregates are extracted from the water table and the resulting pits are backfilled with CD waste legally classified as "inert." Drawing on Discard Studies and territorial political ecology, and building on a two-year interdisciplinary and participatory research project (NAPALAIR) combining documentary analysis, 53 semi-structured interviews, and participatory workshops with residents, farmers, quarry operators, and public authorities, we ask who gains and who pays from CE implementation. Our results show that extraction and disposal are structurally coupled through a profitable "double freight" logistics arrangement, and that backfilling is classified as "recovery" through a permissive legal and regulatory regime shaped largely by industry actors themselves. We further show that current leaching standards fail to capture how submersion in groundwater may alter the degradation kinetics of supposedly inert materials. Rather than curbing extraction, CE targets make quarrying more economically viable, producing what we term a double penalty for the host territory: fertile agricultural land is lost to extraction, then exposed to long-term contamination risk from buried waste, while local municipalities receive only marginal economic benefits. We argue that this extraction-discard coupling is not unique to Ariège, offering scope conditions relevant to CE-driven extractivism in comparable resource-rich, waste receiving territories.
SN - 1462-9011
SN - 1873-6416
ER -