Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,713 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

A geometric resolution limit from vacuum entanglement: Topological Structure and Particle-Wave Asymmetry

Abstract

We establish that vacuum entanglement entropy, regulated by weak spacetime curvature, imposes a fundamental lower bound on radial resolution for quantum excitations. From the area law, weak gravity introduces a natural UV regulator via the perturbative Green's function. Geometric projection yields a minimal radial scale Δrmin ∝ rs2/R, where rs is the Schwarzschild radius and R the boundary radius. Consistency with the Compton wavelength defines a global mass scale mgeo ≡ ℏ R/(c rs2). Particle masses satisfy m = αmgeo, where α encodes vacuum structure. For Earth, mgeo ≈ 2.84 × 10−32 kg. We determine α via spectral analysis of curvature-induced mode shifts, implemented in Python with N=3000 radial points and nmodes=1000. The calculation yields α(2) ≈ 33, matching the electron benchmark without adjustable parameters, ruling out exponential ansätze in favor of slow power-law growth α(l) ∝ l1.27. Crucially, this resolution limit endows the quantum vacuum with the properties of a granular refractive medium. This elegantly explains a fundamental particle-wave asymmetry: massive excitations with λC ≪ Δrmin propagate in the geometric optics limit, following macroscopic gradients as classical geodesics. Conversely, photons with λ≪ Δrmin interact directly with the medium's granularity, leading to phase decoherence and anomalous dispersion. This framework reframes mass as a probe of vacuum-imposed resolution limits, yielding distinct, falsifiable predictions for high-energy photon propagation.

Related

  1. Scalability bottlenecks in entanglement-based satellite quantum key distribution: downlink asymmetry, orbit dependence and finite-key effects
    Xingyu Wang, Jiahao Li, Bolong Wang +8
    npj Quantum InformationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationCrossref
  2. Entanglement Asymmetry and Asymmetry Contour under Boundary Symmetry Breaking
    Takahiro Orito, Daisuke Yamamoto
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  3. Entanglement asymmetry in the gapped XYZ spin-1/2 chain
    Felipe Taha Sant'Ana
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Entanglement Asymmetry in Random Quantum Automata
    Olalla A. Castro-Alvaredo, Dávid Szász-Schagrin, Michele Mazzoni
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  5. Fixed Points, Floquet Entanglement Asymmetry, and Quantum Mpemba Effects
    Jayashish Das, Filiberto Ares, Arnab Kundu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{martin2026geometric,
  title = {{A geometric resolution limit from vacuum entanglement: Topological Structure and Particle-Wave Asymmetry}},
  author = {Isbelia Martin},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.27640},
  eprint = {2608.27640},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27640},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A geometric resolution limit from vacuum entanglement: Topological Structure and Particle-Wave Asymmetry
AU  - Isbelia Martin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.27640
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27640
AB  - We establish that vacuum entanglement entropy, regulated by weak spacetime curvature, imposes a fundamental lower bound on radial resolution for quantum excitations. From the area law, weak gravity introduces a natural UV regulator via the perturbative Green's function. Geometric projection yields a minimal radial scale Δr_min ∝ r_s^2/R, where r_s is the Schwarzschild radius and R the boundary radius. Consistency with the Compton wavelength defines a global mass scale m_geo ≡ ℏ R/(c r_s^2). Particle masses satisfy m = αm_geo, where α encodes vacuum structure. For Earth, m_geo ≈ 2.84 × 10^−32 kg. We determine α via spectral analysis of curvature-induced mode shifts, implemented in Python with N=3000 radial points and n_modes=1000. The calculation yields α(2) ≈ 33, matching the electron benchmark without adjustable parameters, ruling out exponential ansätze in favor of slow power-law growth α(l) ∝ l^1.27. Crucially, this resolution limit endows the quantum vacuum with the properties of a granular refractive medium. This elegantly explains a fundamental particle-wave asymmetry: massive excitations with λ_C ≪ Δr_min propagate in the geometric optics limit, following macroscopic gradients as classical geodesics. Conversely, photons with λ≪ Δr_min interact directly with the medium's granularity, leading to phase decoherence and anomalous dispersion. This framework reframes mass as a probe of vacuum-imposed resolution limits, yielding distinct, falsifiable predictions for high-energy photon propagation.
ER  -