Evaluating the reach of restrictive dietary practices: prevalence and awareness among young females (18–30 years)
- 1Symbiosis School of Culinary Arts and Nutritional Sciences (SSCANS), Symbiosis International (Deemed University)
- 2Research and Analytics, Consultant
Abstract
Purpose Growing popularity of restrictive dietary practices exists among young women; however, their effects on health and factors driving adoption of restrictive dietary practices among young Indian women remain underexplored. The study assessed prevalence, awareness, and effects of perceived restrictive dietary practices among young adult Indian women (18–30 years). Methods A cross-sectional pilot study using online survey was performed pan-India using a pre-tested questionnaire. A total of 230 young women who provided consent and met eligibility criteria completed the study. Information on socio-demographics, nutrition knowledge, dietary habits, and perceived effects of restrictive dietary practices were collected. Descriptive statistics and chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests were performed to investigate associations between age, education attainment status, and outcomes. Results The study reported a prevalence of adoption of restrictive dietary practices was 20.9%, with higher adoption rates among women > 23 years of age (31.7%). The ketogenic diet was the most popular perceived restrictive dietary practice; however, intermittent fasting was the most widely practiced (65.6%). Personal factors, especially physical appearance, predominantly motivated the adoption of restrictive dietary practices (96.3%). Postgraduate participants demonstrated significantly higher nutrition knowledge and healthier dietary practices (p < 0.05) than graduates. Younger women and postgraduates reported significantly lower perceived negative physical and psychological effects of restrictive dieting. Conclusion The prevalence of restrictive dieting among young adult Indian women, primarily driven by personal factors rather than social pressures. Age and education shape awareness, adoption, and perceived effects. Enhancing nutrition education, formal nutrition education, and digital literacy strategies is imperative to mitigate misconceptions and promote evidence-based dietary practices. Further larger studies with objective assessments of nutritional status and nutritional adequacy are recommended. Level of Evidence No level of evidence, Basic Science.
Related
- Music performance anxiety and restrictive dietary behaviors: a moderated serial mediation model
- Effectiveness of a school-based health education programme in improving myopia awareness, knowledge, attitudes and preventive practices: a pre-post intervention study in Cape Coast, Ghana
- Medical Students’ Knowledge, Awareness, and Behaviors Regarding Food, Dietary Supplement, and Drug Interactions Across Academic Years
- Awareness and Prescribing Practices for Doxycycline Post‐Exposure Prophylaxis (doxyPEP) Among Healthcare Providers Delivering Sexual Health Care in Australia: A Cross‐Sectional Survey
- Parental knowledge, attitudes, and discretionary practices regarding children’s dietary salt intake in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study
BibTeX
@article{mogre2026evaluating,
title = {{Evaluating the reach of restrictive dietary practices: prevalence and awareness among young females (18–30 years)}},
author = {Disha Mogre and Parth Tailor and Alkama Mulla and Pooja Panchal and Atul A Gokhale and Kavitha Menon},
journal = {Eating and Weight Disorders},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1007/s40519-026-01893-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-026-01893-x},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Evaluating the reach of restrictive dietary practices: prevalence and awareness among young females (18–30 years)
AU - Disha Mogre
AU - Parth Tailor
AU - Alkama Mulla
AU - Pooja Panchal
AU - Atul A Gokhale
AU - Kavitha Menon
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Eating and Weight Disorders
DO - 10.1007/s40519-026-01893-x
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-026-01893-x
AB - Purpose Growing popularity of restrictive dietary practices exists among young women; however, their effects on health and factors driving adoption of restrictive dietary practices among young Indian women remain underexplored. The study assessed prevalence, awareness, and effects of perceived restrictive dietary practices among young adult Indian women (18–30 years). Methods A cross-sectional pilot study using online survey was performed pan-India using a pre-tested questionnaire. A total of 230 young women who provided consent and met eligibility criteria completed the study. Information on socio-demographics, nutrition knowledge, dietary habits, and perceived effects of restrictive dietary practices were collected. Descriptive statistics and chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests were performed to investigate associations between age, education attainment status, and outcomes. Results The study reported a prevalence of adoption of restrictive dietary practices was 20.9%, with higher adoption rates among women > 23 years of age (31.7%). The ketogenic diet was the most popular perceived restrictive dietary practice; however, intermittent fasting was the most widely practiced (65.6%). Personal factors, especially physical appearance, predominantly motivated the adoption of restrictive dietary practices (96.3%). Postgraduate participants demonstrated significantly higher nutrition knowledge and healthier dietary practices (p < 0.05) than graduates. Younger women and postgraduates reported significantly lower perceived negative physical and psychological effects of restrictive dieting. Conclusion The prevalence of restrictive dieting among young adult Indian women, primarily driven by personal factors rather than social pressures. Age and education shape awareness, adoption, and perceived effects. Enhancing nutrition education, formal nutrition education, and digital literacy strategies is imperative to mitigate misconceptions and promote evidence-based dietary practices. Further larger studies with objective assessments of nutritional status and nutritional adequacy are recommended. Level of Evidence No level of evidence, Basic Science.
SN - 1590-1262
ER -