Differences in autism features and adaptive functioning between adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and social communication disorder
- 1Department of Psychiatry, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , ,
- 2Neudive Inc. , ,
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to characterize adolescents with social communication disorder (SCD) in comparison with those with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) across two dimensions: autism features and adaptive functioning. SCD shares social communication difficulties with ASD, resulting in unclear diagnostic boundaries and raising concerns about its clinical utility given that existing research and resources remain largely ASD-oriented.
Methods: Data from 76 adolescents with ASD and 44 with SCD (ages 10–18 years) were analyzed. Lifetime and current autism features were assessed using the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised (ADI-R) and Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2), respectively, and adaptive functioning using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition. Propensity score matching was performed using age and Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient, and group differences were compared before and after matching. Exploratory interaction analyses additionally examined potential moderators of group differences.
Results: After matching, adolescents with SCD showed less severe lifetime autism features across the core ADI-R domains, with large effect sizes ( d s = .98–1.34, all p <.001). Current autism features showed smaller group differences, which remained significant across all SRS-2 subscales except Social Motivation ( d s = .46–.68, p = .004–.046). Adolescents with SCD showed better adaptive functioning than those with ASD, although group differences in Communication ( p = .085) and Socialization ( p = .144) were no longer statistically significant after matching. Psychiatric comorbidity moderated group differences in Communication, Socialization, and overall adaptive functioning, while attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder showed a similar but less robust pattern for Communication, which did not remain significant after correction.
Discussion: Overall, accounting for age and intellectual ability, the distinction between ASD and SCD remained evident at the symptom level, whereas functional differences were partly influenced by these factors. These findings suggest that diagnostic classification alone may not fully capture the functional needs of adolescents with ASD and SCD, highlighting the importance of a multidimensional approach that considers symptom profiles, adaptive functioning, developmental and intellectual factors, and psychiatric comorbidity.
Related
- Collaborative Outcomes Study on Health and Functioning During Infection Times (COH-FIT): Global and Risk-Group Stratified Course of Well-Being and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Adolescents
- Altered Sensorimotor-Association Axis Patterning of Global Functional Connectivity in an Autism Subtype With Low Levels of Language, Intellectual, and Adaptive Functioning
- Adaptive gating-based fusion of sequential and local features for predicting drug-drug interactions
- Differences in resilience, hope, and sense of coherence among adolescents with ADHD/DCD, co-occurring ADHD and DCD, and typically developing adolescents
- Reduced cognitive empathy and differences in EEG activity in low-achieving adolescents
BibTeX
@article{park2026differences,
title = {{Differences in autism features and adaptive functioning between adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and social communication disorder}},
author = {Seong Hee Park and Sung Ja Cho and Naok Kang and Yoo-Sook Joung},
journal = {Frontiers in psychiatry},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1961001},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13672609},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Differences in autism features and adaptive functioning between adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and social communication disorder
AU - Seong Hee Park
AU - Sung Ja Cho
AU - Naok Kang
AU - Yoo-Sook Joung
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
JO - Frontiers in psychiatry
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1961001
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13672609
AB - Introduction: This study aimed to characterize adolescents with social communication disorder (SCD) in comparison with those with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) across two dimensions: autism features and adaptive functioning. SCD shares social communication difficulties with ASD, resulting in unclear diagnostic boundaries and raising concerns about its clinical utility given that existing research and resources remain largely ASD-oriented. Methods: Data from 76 adolescents with ASD and 44 with SCD (ages 10–18 years) were analyzed. Lifetime and current autism features were assessed using the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised (ADI-R) and Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2), respectively, and adaptive functioning using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition. Propensity score matching was performed using age and Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient, and group differences were compared before and after matching. Exploratory interaction analyses additionally examined potential moderators of group differences. Results: After matching, adolescents with SCD showed less severe lifetime autism features across the core ADI-R domains, with large effect sizes ( d s = .98–1.34, all p <.001). Current autism features showed smaller group differences, which remained significant across all SRS-2 subscales except Social Motivation ( d s = .46–.68, p = .004–.046). Adolescents with SCD showed better adaptive functioning than those with ASD, although group differences in Communication ( p = .085) and Socialization ( p = .144) were no longer statistically significant after matching. Psychiatric comorbidity moderated group differences in Communication, Socialization, and overall adaptive functioning, while attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder showed a similar but less robust pattern for Communication, which did not remain significant after correction. Discussion: Overall, accounting for age and intellectual ability, the distinction between ASD and SCD remained evident at the symptom level, whereas functional differences were partly influenced by these factors. These findings suggest that diagnostic classification alone may not fully capture the functional needs of adolescents with ASD and SCD, highlighting the importance of a multidimensional approach that considers symptom profiles, adaptive functioning, developmental and intellectual factors, and psychiatric comorbidity.
SN - 1664-0640
ER -