Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC cancer

Re-irradiation with image-guided radiotherapy for recurrent cervical cancer: an analysis of outcomes and toxicity.

  1. 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
  2. 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. [email protected].
  3. 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. [email protected].

Abstract

Objective

Recurrent cervical cancer within previously irradiated fields remains a major therapeutic challenge. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and safety of image-guided re-irradiation and to identify prognostic factors associated with tumor control and treatment-related toxicity.Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent image-guided re-irradiation between March 2020 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Re-irradiation was delivered using image-guided external beam radiotherapy and/or image-guided brachytherapy. Concurrent chemotherapy or immunotherapy was administered when clinically indicated. Organ at risk doses were recorded from re-irradiation plans. Logistic models were applied to evaluate tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability.Results

A total of 102 patients were included. At recurrence, 45.1% had central relapse, 14.7% pelvic relapse, 17.6% combined central and pelvic relapse, and 22.5% had distant metastasis. The median re-irradiation dose was 56.8 Gy (a/β = 10). With a median follow-up of 13.7 months, the 1- and 2-year LC were 67.6% and 59.2%, and the 1- and 2-year PFS were 52.7% and 42.6%. Higher re-irradiation prescription EQD2 was associated with improved tumor control. A progression-free interval > 2 years after initial radiotherapy predicted better progression-free survival and local control, whereas distant metastasis was associated with inferior progression-free survival. Higher rectal and bladder D2cc values were significantly associated with increased late toxicity. The risk of grade ≥ 2 late complications rose substantially when the rectal or bladder D2cc exceeded approximately 50 Gy (a/β = 3). No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed in this study.Conclusion

Re-irradiation is a feasible and effective salvage option for patients with recurrent cervical cancer and provides moderate local control with acceptable toxicity.

Related

  1. Safety and Efficacy of Photon Re-Irradiation with Whole-Brain Radiotherapy or Craniospinal Irradiation for Recurrent Pediatric Central Nervous System Malignancies.
    Palak P Patel, Hesham Elhalawani, Karen J Marcus +10
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textHuman geneticsEurope PMC
  2. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and platinum-based chemotherapy for locoregional recurrent cervical cancer: a single-institutional phase II investigator-initiated nonrandomized clinical trial
    Chi Fang, Suping Liu, Jie Xia +3
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  3. Clinical outcomes and toxicity after proton- versus photon-based spatially fractionated radiotherapy for soft-tissue sarcoma: a retrospective cohort
    Adeniyi A. Olabumuyi, Matthew H. Brown, Soha Bazyar +6
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossref
  4. Predicting outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy: a systematic review of nomograms
    Jaekyung Bae, Uisuk Kim, Sokbom Kang
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossrefPMC
  5. Overall treatment time and oncologic outcomes after definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yingding Ruan, Yun Li, Dan Wu +2
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossrefDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{qi2026reirradiation,
  title = {{Re-irradiation with image-guided radiotherapy for recurrent cervical cancer: an analysis of outcomes and toxicity.}},
  author = {Xi Qi and Zhiyong Xiang and Weiping Wang and Kai Liu and Xiaorong Hou and Fuquan Zhang and Ke Hu},
  journal = {BMC cancer},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12885-026-16594-y},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897506},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Re-irradiation with image-guided radiotherapy for recurrent cervical cancer: an analysis of outcomes and toxicity.
AU  - Xi Qi
AU  - Zhiyong Xiang
AU  - Weiping Wang
AU  - Kai Liu
AU  - Xiaorong Hou
AU  - Fuquan Zhang
AU  - Ke Hu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC cancer
DO  - 10.1186/s12885-026-16594-y
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897506
AB  - Objective  Recurrent cervical cancer within previously irradiated fields remains a major therapeutic challenge. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and safety of image-guided re-irradiation and to identify prognostic factors associated with tumor control and treatment-related toxicity.Methods  All consecutive patients who underwent image-guided re-irradiation between March 2020 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Re-irradiation was delivered using image-guided external beam radiotherapy and/or image-guided brachytherapy. Concurrent chemotherapy or immunotherapy was administered when clinically indicated. Organ at risk doses were recorded from re-irradiation plans. Logistic models were applied to evaluate tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability.Results  A total of 102 patients were included. At recurrence, 45.1% had central relapse, 14.7% pelvic relapse, 17.6% combined central and pelvic relapse, and 22.5% had distant metastasis. The median re-irradiation dose was 56.8 Gy (a/β = 10). With a median follow-up of 13.7 months, the 1- and 2-year LC were 67.6% and 59.2%, and the 1- and 2-year PFS were 52.7% and 42.6%. Higher re-irradiation prescription EQD2 was associated with improved tumor control. A progression-free interval > 2 years after initial radiotherapy predicted better progression-free survival and local control, whereas distant metastasis was associated with inferior progression-free survival. Higher rectal and bladder D2cc values were significantly associated with increased late toxicity. The risk of grade ≥ 2 late complications rose substantially when the rectal or bladder D2cc exceeded approximately 50 Gy (a/β = 3). No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed in this study.Conclusion  Re-irradiation is a feasible and effective salvage option for patients with recurrent cervical cancer and provides moderate local control with acceptable toxicity.
SN  - 1471-2407
ER  -