Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYRevista brasileira de enfermagem

Comparison between two methods of cleaning and disinfection of digital pulse oximeters in primary care Comparação entre dois métodos de limpeza e desinfecção de oxímetros digitais de pulso na atenção primária Comparación entre dos métodos de limpieza y desinfección de oxímetros de pulso digitales en atención primaria

5 affiliations
  1. 1Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, National Institute of Infectology Evandro Chagas, Immunization and Health Surveillance Research Unit. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  2. 2National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics Jamil Haddad. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  3. 3Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, National Institute of Infectology Evandro Chagas, Bacteriology and Bioassays Laboratory. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  4. 4Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  5. 5Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, National School of Public Health, Germano Sinval Faria Teaching Primary Care Center. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Abstract

Objectives

to compare the efficacy and duration of cleaning and disinfection of digital oximeters with two methods in a primary care setting.Methods

microbiological culture and adenosine triphosphate assay results were evaluated in oximeters inoculated with Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli: after water and detergent followed by 70% ethanol (method 1); after one-step disinfectant based on benzalkonium chloride and polyhexamethylene biguanide hydrochloride (method 2); and no cleaning and disinfection (control). Effective disinfection was defined as: (1) microbial load reduction of ≥99.99%, (2) negative culture or (3) final microbial load <103.Results

effective disinfection varied between 33.3% (criterion 2) and 72.2% (criterion 3) and was similar between the two methods, while cleaning and disinfection duration in method 2 was notably shorter.Conclusions

the efficacy of the two methods was similar and suboptimal, highlighting the challenges associated with the cleaning and disinfection of electronic medical devices in primary care.

Related

  1. Diversidad de plantas trepadoras y epífitas vasculares en un paisaje agroforestal del sur de Chile: una comparación entre fragmentos de bosque nativo
    Jimmy Pincheira‐Ulbrich, Jaime R. Rau, Cecilia Smith‐Ramírez
    Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de BotánicaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SA7 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
  2. Effects of non-thermal disinfection systems on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum decay and quality attributes of spring-harvested Napa cabbage during long-term storage in South Korea
    Ji-Yeon Lee, Ju-Hui Lee, Eun-Young Chung +1
    Food Science and BiotechnologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPlant biologyPMC
  3. Plasma pre-treatment and peroxynitric acid soaking as a novel oxidative seed disinfection strategy against seed-borne fungal pathogens in maize
    Nina Recek, Jure Mravlje, Rok Zaplotnik +7
    Frontiers in microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyEurope PMC
  4. Plastic-film mulching and microbial inoculant jointly shape soil microbial community assembly during biological greenhouse solar disinfection
    Peng Li, Shengzhang Li, Luyu Wang +3
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0MicrobiologyFrontiersCrossref
  5. UV‐C LED Disinfection of Flexible Rhinolaryngoscopes: Microbiological, Economic, Environmental, and Legislative Evaluation
    Camille Maeyaert, Sofie Claeys, Stien Vandendriessche +4
    Laryngoscope Investigative OtolaryngologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{matos2026comparison,
  title = {{Comparison between two methods of cleaning and disinfection of digital pulse oximeters in primary care Comparação entre dois métodos de limpeza e desinfecção de oxímetros digitais de pulso na atenção primária Comparación entre dos métodos de limpieza y desinfección de oxímetros de pulso digitales en atención primaria}},
  author = {Juliana Arruda de Matos and Ivana Bogado Martinez and Érika de Almeida Leite da Silva Teixeira de Souza and Hilda Silva de Souza Barreto and Maria Cristina da Silva Lourenço and Regina Paiva Daumas},
  journal = {Revista brasileira de enfermagem},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0485},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719134},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison between two methods of cleaning and disinfection of digital pulse oximeters in primary care Comparação entre dois métodos de limpeza e desinfecção de oxímetros digitais de pulso na atenção primária Comparación entre dos métodos de limpieza y desinfección de oxímetros de pulso digitales en atención primaria
AU  - Juliana Arruda de Matos
AU  - Ivana Bogado Martinez
AU  - Érika de Almeida Leite da Silva Teixeira de Souza
AU  - Hilda Silva de Souza Barreto
AU  - Maria Cristina da Silva Lourenço
AU  - Regina Paiva Daumas
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Revista brasileira de enfermagem
DO  - 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0485
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719134
AB  - Objectives  to compare the efficacy and duration of cleaning and disinfection of digital oximeters with two methods in a primary care setting.Methods  microbiological culture and adenosine triphosphate assay results were evaluated in oximeters inoculated with Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli: after water and detergent followed by 70% ethanol (method 1); after one-step disinfectant based on benzalkonium chloride and polyhexamethylene biguanide hydrochloride (method 2); and no cleaning and disinfection (control). Effective disinfection was defined as: (1) microbial load reduction of ≥99.99%, (2) negative culture or (3) final microbial load <103.Results  effective disinfection varied between 33.3% (criterion 2) and 72.2% (criterion 3) and was similar between the two methods, while cleaning and disinfection duration in method 2 was notably shorter.Conclusions  the efficacy of the two methods was similar and suboptimal, highlighting the challenges associated with the cleaning and disinfection of electronic medical devices in primary care.
SN  - 0034-7167
SN  - 1984-0446
ER  -