Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAIMS public health

Implementation of a surveillance and monitoring system for chronic disease: A scoping review: Running title: Chronic disease surveillance and monitoring system.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea.
  2. 2Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
  3. 3Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
  4. 4Department of Healthcare Management, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
  5. 5Department of Biohealth Industry, Graduate School of Transdisciplinary Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Background

Numerous national-based indicators aid in designing population-centered chronic disease surveillance. However, there is little consensus on the key indicators and goals to develop a chronic disease surveillance analysis system.Objective

This study aimed to develop evidence-based indicators to measure and improve the health outcomes of chronic disease surveillance systems in Korea.Methods

A scoping review was focused on peer-reviewed literature from 2012 to 2022 using PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINHAL, Wiley Online, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Three reviewers evaluated and selected the articles in accordance with comprehensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were synthesized using median descriptive analyses, prioritization, and agreement. There was a consensus meeting to discuss the recommendations, and the findings were thematically and descriptively analyzed.Results

Forty-eight articles were finalized and most of them were published in 2019 (18.8%). The studies on chronic disease-based surveillance systems and related data sources were primarily conducted in Canada (58.3%). The findings were prioritized by prevalence rate, risk factors, data linkage, complex disease, and updated indicators in a current system. The key themes of focus were mortality, survival management, diagnosis, treatment, and healthcare systems.Conclusion

Our preliminary measurement methods need validation through follow-up projects. Chronic disease surveillance will improve public health resource allocation and monitoring in real time. Public health and healthcare systems could be enhanced through timely assessments of population health at the local and regional levels. In Korea, experts will validate the chronic disease-based surveillance system's development.

Related

  1. Artificial Intelligence-Guided Extracellular Vesicle Platforms for Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review and Future Directions
    Kumar Digvijay, Henrik Birn, Claudio Ronco
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Assessing the implementation of the disease surveillance and response strategy in Togo
    Dibeka Baman, Stéphanie Maltais, Laurent Cleenewerck de Kiev +1
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  3. Natriuretic Peptide Receptor-C (NPR3) in Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Chronic Lung Disease: A PRISMA-ScR Scoping Review of Diagnostic, Prognostic, Mechanistic, and Therapeutic Evidence
    Emmanuel Eroume A Egom, Adamou Mfopa, Njimona Ibrahim +4
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. A low-cost environmental monitoring framework for climate-sensitive disease surveillance in the Peruvian Amazon
    Bryan Fernandez-Camacho, Edson J. Ascencio, Antony Barja +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Safety of Daprodustat for the Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease Anemia: Final Analysis of a Multicenter Postmarketing Surveillance Study in Japan
    Tadao Akizawa, Kyomi Kanaya, Kiyomi Aizawa +5
    Therapeutic Apheresis and DialysisPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
BibTeX
@article{kim2026implementation,
  title = {{Implementation of a surveillance and monitoring system for chronic disease: A scoping review: Running title: Chronic disease surveillance and monitoring system.}},
  author = {Yejin Kim and Hyung-Seop Sim and Bomgyeol Kim and Vasuki Rajaguru and Tae Hyun Kim},
  journal = {AIMS public health},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.3934/publichealth.2026036},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909290},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Implementation of a surveillance and monitoring system for chronic disease: A scoping review: Running title: Chronic disease surveillance and monitoring system.
AU  - Yejin Kim
AU  - Hyung-Seop Sim
AU  - Bomgyeol Kim
AU  - Vasuki Rajaguru
AU  - Tae Hyun Kim
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/24
JO  - AIMS public health
DO  - 10.3934/publichealth.2026036
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909290
AB  - Background  Numerous national-based indicators aid in designing population-centered chronic disease surveillance. However, there is little consensus on the key indicators and goals to develop a chronic disease surveillance analysis system.Objective  This study aimed to develop evidence-based indicators to measure and improve the health outcomes of chronic disease surveillance systems in Korea.Methods  A scoping review was focused on peer-reviewed literature from 2012 to 2022 using PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINHAL, Wiley Online, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Three reviewers evaluated and selected the articles in accordance with comprehensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were synthesized using median descriptive analyses, prioritization, and agreement. There was a consensus meeting to discuss the recommendations, and the findings were thematically and descriptively analyzed.Results  Forty-eight articles were finalized and most of them were published in 2019 (18.8%). The studies on chronic disease-based surveillance systems and related data sources were primarily conducted in Canada (58.3%). The findings were prioritized by prevalence rate, risk factors, data linkage, complex disease, and updated indicators in a current system. The key themes of focus were mortality, survival management, diagnosis, treatment, and healthcare systems.Conclusion  Our preliminary measurement methods need validation through follow-up projects. Chronic disease surveillance will improve public health resource allocation and monitoring in real time. Public health and healthcare systems could be enhanced through timely assessments of population health at the local and regional levels. In Korea, experts will validate the chronic disease-based surveillance system's development.
SN  - 2327-8994
ER  -