A Virtual Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program to Address Gaps in Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Retrospective Observational Study
- 1Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1 6177262000
- 2Social Innovation Ventures, Washington, DC, United States
Abstract
Background: Traditional brick-and-mortar pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs remain substantially underused, with only 2.7% of Medicare beneficiaries completing PR within 12 months following hospitalization for a COPD exacerbation. Given the critical role of PR in improving exercise tolerance, quality of life, and reducing readmissions, innovative delivery models are needed to address this massive utilization gap. Virtual PR platforms have emerged as a potential solution, offering scalable, and home-based rehabilitation.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a novel virtual PR program on functional, psychosocial, and cardiometabolic outcomes among adults with COPD.
Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed outcomes among patients enrolled in a structured, multidisciplinary virtual PR program between 2022 and 2024. Participants completed individualized exercise and education sessions remotely, supported by a multidisciplinary team including Physicians and Clinical Exercise Physiologists. Baseline and postprogram measures were compared using Cohen d to assess effect sizes across clinical domains. Primary outcomes included changes in maximum metabolic equivalents (METs), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores. Other measures included changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), smoking status, and prevalence of hypertension.
Results: Among 2444 patients completing the program, the largest effect size improvements were observed in maximum METs achieved, DASI, and PHQ-9 scores. The program was also associated with decreased smoking rates and a lower prevalence of hypertension post intervention. Notably, 91% of the studied population self-identified as having a “fixed income,” underscoring the potential for virtual PR to extend access to patients with lower incomes in the United States.
Conclusions: Virtual PR appears to be a promising and potentially more scalable alternative to traditional facility-based PR for patients with COPD. Significant improvements in exercise capacity, mood, and cardiovascular parameters suggest clinical benefit, while reductions in smoking and hypertension further highlight potential for broader health impact. Given the high proportion of participants on fixed incomes, virtual PR may represent an effective strategy to expand access and equity in chronic respiratory care delivery across the United States.
Related
- Real-World Outcomes of a Telephone-Based Virtual Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapy Program: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
- Clinical Disease Activity and Power Doppler Changes Observed During a Multimodal Rehabilitation Program in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Longitudinal Observational Study
- Changes in hepatic functional reserve and renal function during hospitalization in patients with chronic liver disease : A retrospective observational study of inpatient rehabilitation
- Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis–Derived Phase Angle in Initial Medical and Nursing Assessment for Cardiac Rehabilitation: Association with Cardiac Rehabilitation Risk Category and Longitudinal Change During the Program—An Exploratory Prospective Observational Study
- Sex Differences in Rehabilitation Outcomes After Stroke: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study
BibTeX
@article{beschloss2026virtual,
title = {{A Virtual Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program to Address Gaps in Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Retrospective Observational Study}},
author = {Alexander Beschloss and Andrey Ostrovsky},
journal = {JMIR Formative Research},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.2196/85813},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2196/85813},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A Virtual Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program to Address Gaps in Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Retrospective Observational Study
AU - Alexander Beschloss
AU - Andrey Ostrovsky
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/02
JO - JMIR Formative Research
DO - 10.2196/85813
UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/85813
AB - Background: Traditional brick-and-mortar pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs remain substantially underused, with only 2.7% of Medicare beneficiaries completing PR within 12 months following hospitalization for a COPD exacerbation. Given the critical role of PR in improving exercise tolerance, quality of life, and reducing readmissions, innovative delivery models are needed to address this massive utilization gap. Virtual PR platforms have emerged as a potential solution, offering scalable, and home-based rehabilitation. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a novel virtual PR program on functional, psychosocial, and cardiometabolic outcomes among adults with COPD. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed outcomes among patients enrolled in a structured, multidisciplinary virtual PR program between 2022 and 2024. Participants completed individualized exercise and education sessions remotely, supported by a multidisciplinary team including Physicians and Clinical Exercise Physiologists. Baseline and postprogram measures were compared using Cohen d to assess effect sizes across clinical domains. Primary outcomes included changes in maximum metabolic equivalents (METs), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores. Other measures included changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), smoking status, and prevalence of hypertension. Results: Among 2444 patients completing the program, the largest effect size improvements were observed in maximum METs achieved, DASI, and PHQ-9 scores. The program was also associated with decreased smoking rates and a lower prevalence of hypertension post intervention. Notably, 91% of the studied population self-identified as having a “fixed income,” underscoring the potential for virtual PR to extend access to patients with lower incomes in the United States. Conclusions: Virtual PR appears to be a promising and potentially more scalable alternative to traditional facility-based PR for patients with COPD. Significant improvements in exercise capacity, mood, and cardiovascular parameters suggest clinical benefit, while reductions in smoking and hypertension further highlight potential for broader health impact. Given the high proportion of participants on fixed incomes, virtual PR may represent an effective strategy to expand access and equity in chronic respiratory care delivery across the United States.
SN - 2561-326X
ER -