Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Least-Favorable Location for Binomial Top-t Selection

Abstract

Consider k independent Bernoulli populations, each sampled n times, and select the t populations with the largest success counts, breaking ties uniformly. Classical monotonicity reduces the worst case over the preference zone with separation δ to the slippage family with levels p and p+δ, leaving only its absolute location p∈[0,1−δ] undetermined. A Gaussian approximation suggests the symmetric center pc=(1−δ)/2, and the exact two-population problem is uniquely centered there for every n≥2. For fixed k,t and δ∈(0,1), we prove that exact eventual centering holds precisely when k=2t. When k≠2t, the least-favorable location pn,k,t* satisfies pn,k,t*−pc =(k−2t)Cδn−1/2e−nΓδ{1+o(1)}, where Cδ and Γδ are explicit and positive. In either case, the least-favorable location is eventually unique. The proof writes incorrect selection as a union of pairwise misrankings and applies inclusion--exclusion, yielding a bipartite graph expansion. A single misranking has its exact maximum at the symmetric center and determines the central curvature; two-edge intersections sharing one population determine the central slope through their multiplicity imbalance; all remaining graphs have higher large-deviation rates.

Related

  1. Sharp p-adic Extrema and Least Extremal Rows for Restricted Binomial GCDs
    John Fairfax-Ball
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. Beyond least-favorable distribution pairs: asymptotically instance-optimal robust hypothesis testing
    Aytijhya Saha, Aaditya Ramdas
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Cross-validated feature selection using least-squares support vector machines for binary classification
    Masaharu Mori, Shunnosuke Ikeda, Ryuta Tamura +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Regularity and depth of binomial ideals arising from combinatorics
    Takayuki Hibi, Seyed Amin Seyed Fakhari
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. Stein's method for negative binomial and hyper-negative-binomial laws, with applications
    Stephen DeSalvo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{wu2026leastfavorable,
  title = {{Least-Favorable Location for Binomial Top-$t$ Selection}},
  author = {Yinhao Wu and Pinyuen Chen},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.03466},
  eprint = {2609.03466},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03466},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Least-Favorable Location for Binomial Top-t Selection
AU  - Yinhao Wu
AU  - Pinyuen Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.03466
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03466
AB  - Consider k independent Bernoulli populations, each sampled n times, and select the t populations with the largest success counts, breaking ties uniformly. Classical monotonicity reduces the worst case over the preference zone with separation δ to the slippage family with levels p and p+δ, leaving only its absolute location p∈[0,1−δ] undetermined. A Gaussian approximation suggests the symmetric center p_c=(1−δ)/2, and the exact two-population problem is uniquely centered there for every n≥2. For fixed k,t and δ∈(0,1), we prove that exact eventual centering holds precisely when k=2t. When k≠2t, the least-favorable location p_n,k,t^* satisfies p_n,k,t^*−p_c =(k−2t)C_δn^−1/2e^−nΓ_δ{1+o(1)}, where C_δ and Γ_δ are explicit and positive. In either case, the least-favorable location is eventually unique. The proof writes incorrect selection as a union of pairwise misrankings and applies inclusion--exclusion, yielding a bipartite graph expansion. A single misranking has its exact maximum at the symmetric center and determines the central curvature; two-edge intersections sharing one population determine the central slope through their multiplicity imbalance; all remaining graphs have higher large-deviation rates.
ER  -