Stabilization of cervical stiffness associated with cervical pessary placement in women at risk for preterm birth
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, HamburgGermany
- 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Kiel, KielGermany
- 3Pregnolia AG, Schlieren, Switzerland
- 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buergerhospital and Clementine Children’s Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Abstract
Purpose: Shortening of the cervix is a predictor of spontaneous preterm birth (PTB). It is assumed that a cervical pessary reduces mechanical stress on the internal os and consequently decreases the risk of premature delivery. The primary aim of this study was to compare longitudinal changes in cervical stiffness between women with cervical shortening (a cervical length ≤ 25 mm according to the ISUOG guidelines) treated with a cervical pessary and healthy controls. Methods: A total of 89 pregnant participants were analysed in this prospective observational study. Among them, 30 received a cervical pessary because of cervical shortening below 25 mm. The remaining 59 women served as the control group. Cervical stiffness was measured with the Pregnolia® system at two time points: between 18 + 0 and 24 + 6 weeks of gestation (first appointment) and again 4 weeks later. In the pessary cohort, the baseline measurement was obtained prior to pessary insertion. Results: At four weeks, women in the control group demonstrated a decrease in the median Cervical Stiffness Index (CSI) value: 60.8 vs. 46.7 mbar (nominal p = 0.03) although this difference did not remain statistically significant after FDR adjustment (p = 0.09). In contrast, median CSI values remained stable in the pessary group (71.2 vs. 73.7 mbar; p = 0.88). Cervical length and uterocervical angle (UCA) did not change within the observation period in either group. Moreover, the median birth weight in the normal cohort and in the Pessary cohort was 3380 g (3175–3570) and 3185 g (3011–3450), respectively (p = 0.062). Conclusion: In women with the cervical shortening treated with the pessary cervical stiffness remained stable, whereas a decline was observed in the control group. These findings support a potential association between cervical pessary treatment and stabilisation of cervical stiffness. Further studies, including untreated women with cervical shortening are needed to confirm these findings and to better understand the underlying biomechanical mechanisms.
Related
- Myocardial Stiffness Tracking & Assessment Toolkit Driven by Artificial Intelligence For Reproducible Benchmarking of Temporal Segmentation and Shear-Wave Velocity Stabilization on Synthetic Data
- Accuracy and Safety of a Triad-Dependent Technique for Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement: A Prospective Cohort Study
- Cervical Pedicle Inlet Screws: Clinical Results of a Novel Trajectory for Navigated Screw Placement in the Sub-axial Cervical Spine
- Anterior-Only Stabilization of Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries: Why Constructs Fail and Why Most Survive-A Systematic Review.
- Serum Osteopontin Is Associated with Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index-Defined Arterial Stiffness in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study
BibTeX
@article{kyvernitakis2026stabilization,
title = {{Stabilization of cervical stiffness associated with cervical pessary placement in women at risk for preterm birth}},
author = {Ioannis Kyvernitakis and Philien Lauer and Laura Bernardi and Sabrina Badir and Franz Bahlmann and Holger Maul and Maciej Osinski},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0359271},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359271},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Stabilization of cervical stiffness associated with cervical pessary placement in women at risk for preterm birth
AU - Ioannis Kyvernitakis
AU - Philien Lauer
AU - Laura Bernardi
AU - Sabrina Badir
AU - Franz Bahlmann
AU - Holger Maul
AU - Maciej Osinski
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/28
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0359271
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359271
AB - Purpose: Shortening of the cervix is a predictor of spontaneous preterm birth (PTB). It is assumed that a cervical pessary reduces mechanical stress on the internal os and consequently decreases the risk of premature delivery. The primary aim of this study was to compare longitudinal changes in cervical stiffness between women with cervical shortening (a cervical length ≤ 25 mm according to the ISUOG guidelines) treated with a cervical pessary and healthy controls. Methods: A total of 89 pregnant participants were analysed in this prospective observational study. Among them, 30 received a cervical pessary because of cervical shortening below 25 mm. The remaining 59 women served as the control group. Cervical stiffness was measured with the Pregnolia® system at two time points: between 18 + 0 and 24 + 6 weeks of gestation (first appointment) and again 4 weeks later. In the pessary cohort, the baseline measurement was obtained prior to pessary insertion. Results: At four weeks, women in the control group demonstrated a decrease in the median Cervical Stiffness Index (CSI) value: 60.8 vs. 46.7 mbar (nominal p = 0.03) although this difference did not remain statistically significant after FDR adjustment (p = 0.09). In contrast, median CSI values remained stable in the pessary group (71.2 vs. 73.7 mbar; p = 0.88). Cervical length and uterocervical angle (UCA) did not change within the observation period in either group. Moreover, the median birth weight in the normal cohort and in the Pessary cohort was 3380 g (3175–3570) and 3185 g (3011–3450), respectively (p = 0.062). Conclusion: In women with the cervical shortening treated with the pessary cervical stiffness remained stable, whereas a decline was observed in the control group. These findings support a potential association between cervical pessary treatment and stabilisation of cervical stiffness. Further studies, including untreated women with cervical shortening are needed to confirm these findings and to better understand the underlying biomechanical mechanisms.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -