Evidenced by Indigenous and Western Science: An Arctic Nation Building Project Threatens Caribou Conservation and Inuit Harvesting Rights
4 affiliations
- 1Cloudberry Connections, Avonport, Nova Scotia, Canada
- 2Kugluktuk Angoniatit Association, Kugluktuk, Nunavut, Canada;
- 3University of Calgary, Ecosystem and Public Health, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;
- 4Cloudberry Connections, Avonport, Nova Scotia, Canada;
Abstract
Canada's mineral security strategy may conflict with obligations to protect at-risk species and Indigenous rights, as in the proposed Grays Bay Road and Port (GBRP), intended to unlock mineral deposits in Nunavut. We integrated harvesting data from three sources — Government of Nunavut harvest records, a community-based caribou surveillance program, and Indigenous Knowledge participatory mapping — on a hexagonal grid to assess overlap between Inuit harvesting of Dolphin and Union (DU) caribou and the proposed corridor. Hotspot analysis identified three harvesting hotspots. The largest lies directly in the GBRP's path — significant at 99% confidence, harvester-confirmed as most important. One hotspot, supported by only two GPS records, was confirmed only through participatory mapping, illustrating the value of combining both data sources. Beyond habitat loss and barrier effects, the GBRP would extend the sea-ice-dependent shipping season DU caribou migration relies on, a pathway outside regulatory scope. These findings indicate the GBRP will harm caribou conservation, food security, and harvesting rights, mitigation unlikely given comparable failures elsewhere. We recommend immediate federal listing of DU caribou as Endangered, evaluation of the GBRP against these hotspots, and enforceable sea-ice mitigation. Divergence among Inuit rights holders over consent disqualifies the GBRP from streamlined federal review.
Related
- Medieval landscapes of Corsica: Farming and cultural practices and environments as evidenced by an anthracological study of three archaeological castellated sites (Rostino, Contudine and L’Ortolo)
- Large estimated size of the Australian Indigenous population before its extensive decline following colonial invasion
- Radiation regimes shape microbial light-harvesting strategies and network organization on glacier surfaces
- Integrated machine learning and AHP-based framework for spatial delineation of rainwater harvesting potential
- Is Indigenous Knowledge meaningfully represented in the IPCC AR6? A bibliometric meta-analysis
BibTeX
@article{hanke2026evidenced,
title = {{Evidenced by Indigenous and Western Science: An Arctic Nation Building Project Threatens Caribou Conservation and Inuit Harvesting Rights}},
author = {Andrea Hanke and Amanda Dumond and Susan J Kutz and David Borish},
journal = {Arctic Science},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1139/as-2026-0029},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2026-0029},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Evidenced by Indigenous and Western Science: An Arctic Nation Building Project Threatens Caribou Conservation and Inuit Harvesting Rights
AU - Andrea Hanke
AU - Amanda Dumond
AU - Susan J Kutz
AU - David Borish
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Arctic Science
DO - 10.1139/as-2026-0029
UR - https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2026-0029
AB - Canada's mineral security strategy may conflict with obligations to protect at-risk species and Indigenous rights, as in the proposed Grays Bay Road and Port (GBRP), intended to unlock mineral deposits in Nunavut. We integrated harvesting data from three sources — Government of Nunavut harvest records, a community-based caribou surveillance program, and Indigenous Knowledge participatory mapping — on a hexagonal grid to assess overlap between Inuit harvesting of Dolphin and Union (DU) caribou and the proposed corridor. Hotspot analysis identified three harvesting hotspots. The largest lies directly in the GBRP's path — significant at 99% confidence, harvester-confirmed as most important. One hotspot, supported by only two GPS records, was confirmed only through participatory mapping, illustrating the value of combining both data sources. Beyond habitat loss and barrier effects, the GBRP would extend the sea-ice-dependent shipping season DU caribou migration relies on, a pathway outside regulatory scope. These findings indicate the GBRP will harm caribou conservation, food security, and harvesting rights, mitigation unlikely given comparable failures elsewhere. We recommend immediate federal listing of DU caribou as Endangered, evaluation of the GBRP against these hotspots, and enforceable sea-ice mitigation. Divergence among Inuit rights holders over consent disqualifies the GBRP from streamlined federal review.
SN - 2368-7460
ER -