On the theoretical limitations of joint inversion for basal slipperiness and effective viscosity in ice-flow models
- 1Northumbria University (Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom)
Abstract
When modelling ice flows there are several aspects which are poorly constrained by observations, in particular parameters related to ice rheology and basal sliding. In computational ice flow models, inversion methods are frequently used to estimate the spatial distribution of these hidden fields. These methods use surface measurement data in combination with a forward model of the ice dynamics that relate the hidden fields to the surface fields. In this study we approximate the forward model using first-order linear perturbation theory to gain insights into our ability to extract information about the ice viscosity at the same time as basal slipperiness, and to understand the theoretical limitations. We frame the inversion problem in terms of a Gaussian maximum a-posteriori estimation with explicitly stated priors for the hidden fields. We illustrate the inversion behaviour with perturbations applied to flow down a laterally confined channel, where both viscosity and slipperiness can play a significant role in the ice sheet dynamics. Our results indicate that it is possible to extract information about the viscosity field at the same time as estimating the basal slipperiness, with strong horizontal gradients in the surface velocity field essential for good viscosity retrieval. We recommend always inverting for basal slipperiness and viscosity together over grounded ice areas in ice-sheet models, and explicitly recognising prior knowledge of the hidden fields in the retrieval through either the inclusion of appropriate priors and regularisation.
Versions
Related
- Effects of physico-chemical factors on the viscosity evolution of anaerobic granular sludge
- High flow capacity and low viscosity of the Séítah formation, at Jezero Crater, Mars
- Flow dependence of boundary-layer scheme parameters revealed by stochastic inversion
- Selective Impacts of Prior, Background-Concentration, and Observation-Error Assumptions on Urban CO2 Inversion Estimates
- Structurally coupled cooperative inversion of ERT and SRT data with sequential cluster analysis for integrated imaging of an Andean rock glacier
BibTeX
@article{schelpe2026theoretical,
title = {{On the theoretical limitations of joint inversion for basal slipperiness and effective viscosity in ice-flow models}},
author = {Camilla A. O. Schelpe and G. Hilmar Gudmundsson},
journal = {The Cryosphere},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5194/tc-20-6003-2026},
url = {https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/6003/2026/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - On the theoretical limitations of joint inversion for basal slipperiness and effective viscosity in ice-flow models
AU - Camilla A. O. Schelpe
AU - G. Hilmar Gudmundsson
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
JO - The Cryosphere
DO - 10.5194/tc-20-6003-2026
UR - https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/6003/2026/
AB - When modelling ice flows there are several aspects which are poorly constrained by observations, in particular parameters related to ice rheology and basal sliding. In computational ice flow models, inversion methods are frequently used to estimate the spatial distribution of these hidden fields. These methods use surface measurement data in combination with a forward model of the ice dynamics that relate the hidden fields to the surface fields. In this study we approximate the forward model using first-order linear perturbation theory to gain insights into our ability to extract information about the ice viscosity at the same time as basal slipperiness, and to understand the theoretical limitations. We frame the inversion problem in terms of a Gaussian maximum a-posteriori estimation with explicitly stated priors for the hidden fields. We illustrate the inversion behaviour with perturbations applied to flow down a laterally confined channel, where both viscosity and slipperiness can play a significant role in the ice sheet dynamics. Our results indicate that it is possible to extract information about the viscosity field at the same time as estimating the basal slipperiness, with strong horizontal gradients in the surface velocity field essential for good viscosity retrieval. We recommend always inverting for basal slipperiness and viscosity together over grounded ice areas in ice-sheet models, and explicitly recognising prior knowledge of the hidden fields in the retrieval through either the inclusion of appropriate priors and regularisation.
SN - 1994-0424
ER -