Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,460 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYActa neurochirurgica

External validation of the Liverpool Head Injury Tomography Score for mild traumatic brain injury.

4 more authors
8 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. [email protected].
  2. 2Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK. [email protected].
  3. 3Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
  4. 4Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
  5. 5Orion MedTech Ltd. CIC, Cambridge, UK.
  6. 6Perioperative, Acute, Critical, and Emergency Care (PACE) Section, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  7. 7NIHR HealthTech Research Centre in Brain Injury, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
  8. 8Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Abstract

Background

Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) neurosurgical referrals are increasing. This study aimed to externally validate a radiological scoring system to define a 'neurosurgically significant' mild TBI and evaluate its impact on referral outcome if implemented.Method

Retrospective, external validation of the UK Liverpool Head Injury Tomography Score (LIV-HITS). Consecutive neurosurgery referrals to a tertiary neurosurgery centre for mild TBI were included (1st January 2022-30th June 2022). Mechanism of injury, LIV-HITS and management decision were identified, and diagnostic accuracy determined.Results

A total of 1547 referrals were included. 147 (9.5%) were accepted for transfer, and 1400 (90.5%) were designated as local management. For neurosurgical transfer, the sensitivity of LIV-HITS was 99.3% and the specificity was 43.9%, with a positive predictive value of 15.7%, and negative predictive value of 99.8%. Discriminatory power of the model was fair (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.66-0.76). In 6 months, the score identified 615 referrals (39.8%) that could have been successfully triaged to local management if the scoring system was used.Conclusions

The LIV-HITS has a sensitivity of over 99% for excluding a neurosurgically significant mild TBI in an externally validated cohort. However, the discriminatory power of the score is poor for stratifying which patients eventually get transferred to a neurosurgical centre. The score in clinical practice could be used as a 'rule out' tool for mild TBI referrals, whilst identifying potentially significant mild TBI that would warrant emergency neurosurgical consideration.

Related

  1. External validation and comparative performance of four risk scores for acute kidney injury in critically ill adults
    Fangyan Liu, Linpei Jia, Jing Wang +6
    Renal failurePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. A Parsimonious Machine Learning Model for Predicting Invasive Coronary Angiography Referral After Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Development and Multicentre External Validation
    Alec Chunta, Caitlyn Gilbert, Dina Labib +10
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Possible Limited Justification for Systematic Head Computed Tomography Scans Based Solely on Antithrombotic Therapy in Elderly Patients (Aged 75 or Older) with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Emma Jaffres, Jean-Nicolas Dacher, Mehdi Taalba +6
    Research in Diagnostic and Interventional ImagingPeer-reviewedCC BY1 citedEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  4. Early hemoglobin trajectories and short-term mortality in ICU patients with traumatic brain injury: development in MIMIC-IV and external assessment in eICU-CRD.
    Saijie Li, Yanyu Han, Feiyu Ding +5
    Frontiers in neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Tau positron emission tomography harmonization using the CenTauR approach: General conversion equations, relevant cut-points, and external validation.
    Alexis Moscoso Rial, Antoine Leuzy, Lars Lau Raket +62
    Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's AssociationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{gillespie2026external,
  title = {{External validation of the Liverpool Head Injury Tomography Score for mild traumatic brain injury.}},
  author = {Conor S Gillespie and Yuhan Guo and Matthew Kingham and Shangqing W Yang and Zhikai Li and Munashe Veremu and William H Cook and Youssef Chedid and Emily Simmons and Naomi Deakin and David Clark and Virginia F J Newcombe and Peter J Hutchinson and Catherine J McMahon and Alexis J Joannides and East of England Emergency Neurosurgery Collaborative},
  journal = {Acta neurochirurgica},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1007/s00701-026-06991-4},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42967959},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - External validation of the Liverpool Head Injury Tomography Score for mild traumatic brain injury.
AU  - Conor S Gillespie
AU  - Yuhan Guo
AU  - Matthew Kingham
AU  - Shangqing W Yang
AU  - Zhikai Li
AU  - Munashe Veremu
AU  - William H Cook
AU  - Youssef Chedid
AU  - Emily Simmons
AU  - Naomi Deakin
AU  - David Clark
AU  - Virginia F J Newcombe
AU  - Peter J Hutchinson
AU  - Catherine J McMahon
AU  - Alexis J Joannides
AU  - East of England Emergency Neurosurgery Collaborative
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/04
JO  - Acta neurochirurgica
DO  - 10.1007/s00701-026-06991-4
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42967959
AB  - Background  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) neurosurgical referrals are increasing. This study aimed to externally validate a radiological scoring system to define a 'neurosurgically significant' mild TBI and evaluate its impact on referral outcome if implemented.Method  Retrospective, external validation of the UK Liverpool Head Injury Tomography Score (LIV-HITS). Consecutive neurosurgery referrals to a tertiary neurosurgery centre for mild TBI were included (1st January 2022-30th June 2022). Mechanism of injury, LIV-HITS and management decision were identified, and diagnostic accuracy determined.Results  A total of 1547 referrals were included. 147 (9.5%) were accepted for transfer, and 1400 (90.5%) were designated as local management. For neurosurgical transfer, the sensitivity of LIV-HITS was 99.3% and the specificity was 43.9%, with a positive predictive value of 15.7%, and negative predictive value of 99.8%. Discriminatory power of the model was fair (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.66-0.76). In 6 months, the score identified 615 referrals (39.8%) that could have been successfully triaged to local management if the scoring system was used.Conclusions  The LIV-HITS has a sensitivity of over 99% for excluding a neurosurgically significant mild TBI in an externally validated cohort. However, the discriminatory power of the score is poor for stratifying which patients eventually get transferred to a neurosurgical centre. The score in clinical practice could be used as a 'rule out' tool for mild TBI referrals, whilst identifying potentially significant mild TBI that would warrant emergency neurosurgical consideration.
SN  - 0001-6268
SN  - 0942-0940
ER  -