Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Wearable-derived daily steps and first recorded cardiovascular diagnoses: outpatient and acute care in All of Us

  1. 1University of California Santa Barbara

Abstract

Wearable-derived daily step counts are associated with cardiovascular health, but associations with the setting of cardiovascular disease (CVD) recording are less clear. We conducted a retrospective landmark cohort study using linked Fitbit, survey, and electronic health record data from the All of Us Research Program. Steps were averaged over the year before baseline. Eligibility required post-baseline sleep coverage and survey completeness, and classifiable pre-baseline smoking and drinking information; former smokers were excluded. After excluding participants with primary or secondary CVD recorded before baseline and 1,470 with either status during the first post-baseline year, outcomes were classified by the first qualifying primary CVD record during years two and three; a single qualifying outpatient record was sufficient. Among 8,292 participants, 5,780 had no recorded CVD, 2,127 had outpatient recording, and 385 had acute-care recording. Multinomial models adjusted for age, sex at birth, smoking, and drinking categories. Each one-standard-deviation increase in step count (3,299 steps/day) was associated with lower odds of outpatient recording versus no recorded CVD (odds ratio 0.786, 95% confidence interval 0.744-0.830), acute-care recording versus no recorded CVD (0.659, 0.586-0.742), and acute-care versus outpatient recording (0.839, 0.742-0.948). Both associations relative to no recorded CVD remained inverse across the tested hypothetical allocations of 455 missing-setting cases, whereas the acute-care-versus-outpatient point estimate approached or crossed the null under some scenarios. Secondary exploratory mediation analyses using a pooled score combining sleep, mental-health, and clinical-burden measures identified indirect associations for both settings versus no recorded CVD, but the between-setting indirect contrast was inconclusive. In this selected cohort, the findings highlight the importance of endpoint definition and recording completeness when interpreting wearable-EHR associations.

Related

  1. GLP-1 receptor agonist initiation and newly recorded ankylosing spondylitis diagnoses in type 2 diabetes: a target trial emulation
    Yu-Chen Lu, Tzu-Hao Li, Ya-Fang Liu +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismCrossref
  2. Yield of Low Serum Vitamin B12 Results in General Pediatric Outpatient Practice: Age-Specific Patterns and Associations with Testing Indications and Recorded Clinical Features
    Timucin Imdadoglu, Emel Altuncu, Elif Betul Keskin Cetinkaya +3
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Newly recorded psychiatric diagnoses among 21 million youth before, during, and after COVID‐19 restrictions: A nationwide interrupted time‐series analysis
    Naomi Matsumoto, Hisashi Ishida, Shunsaku Hayase +5
    Psychiatry and Clinical NeurosciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  4. Recorded ocular diagnoses in adults with homocystinuria: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
    Justus Zemberi, Julian Peregoff, Gui-Shuang Ying
    AJO internationalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Integrating Wearable Sensor Technology into Outpatient Rehabilitation Care: A Proof-of-Concept Study
    A. Miller, C. Holleran, M. Bland +7
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{xu2026wearablederived,
  title = {{Wearable-derived daily steps and first recorded cardiovascular diagnoses: outpatient and acute care in All of Us}},
  author = {K. Xu and A. Qu},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.29.26366804},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366804v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Wearable-derived daily steps and first recorded cardiovascular diagnoses: outpatient and acute care in All of Us
AU  - K. Xu
AU  - A. Qu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.29.26366804
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366804v1
AB  - Wearable-derived daily step counts are associated with cardiovascular health, but associations with the setting of cardiovascular disease (CVD) recording are less clear. We conducted a retrospective landmark cohort study using linked Fitbit, survey, and electronic health record data from the All of Us Research Program. Steps were averaged over the year before baseline. Eligibility required post-baseline sleep coverage and survey completeness, and classifiable pre-baseline smoking and drinking information; former smokers were excluded. After excluding participants with primary or secondary CVD recorded before baseline and 1,470 with either status during the first post-baseline year, outcomes were classified by the first qualifying primary CVD record during years two and three; a single qualifying outpatient record was sufficient. Among 8,292 participants, 5,780 had no recorded CVD, 2,127 had outpatient recording, and 385 had acute-care recording. Multinomial models adjusted for age, sex at birth, smoking, and drinking categories. Each one-standard-deviation increase in step count (3,299 steps/day) was associated with lower odds of outpatient recording versus no recorded CVD (odds ratio 0.786, 95% confidence interval 0.744-0.830), acute-care recording versus no recorded CVD (0.659, 0.586-0.742), and acute-care versus outpatient recording (0.839, 0.742-0.948). Both associations relative to no recorded CVD remained inverse across the tested hypothetical allocations of 455 missing-setting cases, whereas the acute-care-versus-outpatient point estimate approached or crossed the null under some scenarios. Secondary exploratory mediation analyses using a pooled score combining sleep, mental-health, and clinical-burden measures identified indirect associations for both settings versus no recorded CVD, but the between-setting indirect contrast was inconclusive. In this selected cohort, the findings highlight the importance of endpoint definition and recording completeness when interpreting wearable-EHR associations.
ER  -