Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
PreprintCC BYChemRxiv

StateFlux: DFT-Validated Quantum Reactivity across Predicted Metabolic State Networks Shows Limited Incremental Value for Broad Toxicity Prediction

  1. 1Stanford University, 415 Broadway, Redwood City, California, 94063

Abstract

Mechanistic molecular representations are increasingly used to supplement parent structure with protonation, metabolism, and quantum-chemical reactivity, but added physical detail does not necessarily provide predictive information beyond structure. StateFlux represents each drug as a network of chemical and predicted metabolic states with node-level GFN2-xTB properties and edge-resolved changes in ionization potential, electron affinity, electrophilicity, solvation, and local reactivity. On a locked DILIrank 2.0 development set (n = 376; 156 positive and 220 negative), 10 × 5 scaffold-grouped validation gave AUROC/AUPRC values of 0.8249/0.7727 for ECFP, 0.8049/0.7430 for ECFP + FluxCore, and 0.8010/0.7261 for ECFP + StateFluxCore. Strict temporal and scaffold-novel tests showed no consistent gain, and an independent 5,367-compound genotoxicity transfer benchmark reproduced the pattern (AUROC 0.7765 for ECFP versus 0.7732 for StateFluxCore). To separate limited predictive utility from inaccurate low-cost quantum chemistry, 24 parent-to-metabolite transformations were evaluated with 144 ωB97X-D/6-31+G*/SMD single-point calculations. GFN2-xTB closely tracked DFT changes in electrophilicity (Pearson r = 0.963; MAE = 0.408 eV; 79.2% sign agreement). Thus, transformation-induced quantum reactivity can be consistent with higher-level DFT without providing reliable incremental information for broad toxicity classification. Quantum-chemical fidelity and predictive utility should therefore be evaluated as separate claims in chemical machine learning.

Related

  1. StateFlux: Physically Validated Quantum Metabolic State Networks Reveal Limited Incremental Value for Toxicity Prediction
    Aris Tsai
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  2. Site-Resolved Prediction of Mayr Nucleophilicity with Reactivity-Pretrained Graph Neural Networks
    Shangkun Shi, Junliang He, Zikang Dong +2
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  3. Rotamer-Dependent Amino Acid Descriptors as Protein and Peptide Representation for Reactivity and Property Prediction
    Lauriane Jacot-Descombes, Kjell Jorner
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  4. Tensor-based Approximation of Molecular Kinetics: Generator Learning, Reaction Coordinates and Incremental Updating
    Minakshi Verma, Peter Benner, Feliks Nüske
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryarXiv
  5. Reactivity of a Bis(alkynyl)-Vinylidene Osmium Complex: Access to Carbynes, Vinyl Ester Derivatives, and C–C and C–N Bond-Forming Reactions
    OrganometallicsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOrganic chemistryEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{tsai2026stateflux,
  title = {{StateFlux: DFT-Validated Quantum Reactivity across Predicted Metabolic State Networks Shows Limited Incremental Value for Broad Toxicity Prediction}},
  author = {Aris Tsai},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15009594/v1},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15009594/v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - StateFlux: DFT-Validated Quantum Reactivity across Predicted Metabolic State Networks Shows Limited Incremental Value for Broad Toxicity Prediction
AU  - Aris Tsai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15009594/v1
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15009594/v1
AB  - Mechanistic molecular representations are increasingly used to supplement parent structure with protonation, metabolism, and quantum-chemical reactivity, but added physical detail does not necessarily provide predictive information beyond structure. StateFlux represents each drug as a network of chemical and predicted metabolic states with node-level GFN2-xTB properties and edge-resolved changes in ionization potential, electron affinity, electrophilicity, solvation, and local reactivity. On a locked DILIrank 2.0 development set (n = 376; 156 positive and 220 negative), 10 × 5 scaffold-grouped validation gave AUROC/AUPRC values of 0.8249/0.7727 for ECFP, 0.8049/0.7430 for ECFP + FluxCore, and 0.8010/0.7261 for ECFP + StateFluxCore. Strict temporal and scaffold-novel tests showed no consistent gain, and an independent 5,367-compound genotoxicity transfer benchmark reproduced the pattern (AUROC 0.7765 for ECFP versus 0.7732 for StateFluxCore). To separate limited predictive utility from inaccurate low-cost quantum chemistry, 24 parent-to-metabolite transformations were evaluated with 144 ωB97X-D/6-31+G*/SMD single-point calculations. GFN2-xTB closely tracked DFT changes in electrophilicity (Pearson r = 0.963; MAE = 0.408 eV; 79.2% sign agreement). Thus, transformation-induced quantum reactivity can be consistent with higher-level DFT without providing reliable incremental information for broad toxicity classification. Quantum-chemical fidelity and predictive utility should therefore be evaluated as separate claims in chemical machine learning.
ER  -