Hybrid IF–GNN–IF Framework for Suspected Fraud Detection in Bank Switching Transactions
Abstract
Fraud detection in financial transactions remains a major challenge in the banking industry, particularly in bank switching systems that process high transaction volumes and involve complex interactions among transaction entities. This study proposes a hybrid Isolation Forest–Graph Neural Network–Isolation Forest (IF–GNN–IF) framework to identify suspected fraudulent transactions in bank switching data. In the first stage, Isolation Forest detects potentially anomalous transactions and produces anomaly scores that are used to construct pseudo-labels. In the second stage, a Graph Neural Network learns relational patterns from a transaction graph by integrating original transaction attributes with the pseudo-labels. In the final stage, the learned graph embeddings are combined with the original transaction features and evaluated using a second Isolation Forest to generate final anomaly scores. The framework was evaluated using 71,873 bank switching transaction records and achieved an accuracy of 0.9668, precision of 0.9200, recall of 0.3681, and an F1-score of 0.5258. The high precision indicates that the framework effectively identifies suspicious transaction patterns. However, the relatively low recall suggests that some suspected fraud cases remain undetected. Therefore, further validation using confirmed fraud labels is necessary to assess the practical effectiveness and generalizability of the proposed framework in real-world banking environments.
Related
- Posterior Regimes and Latent Deception: Variational Bayesian Inference in Hidden Markov Models for Sequential Fraud Detection in Financial Transactions
- A lightweight hybrid CNN–vision transformer framework for image-based Android malware detection
- Transformer-aided guard: A hybrid spatio-temporal framework for confidence-aware intrusion detection in cyber-physical systems
- Exact random centering and hybrid fluctuation limits for interacting reinforced processes under critical Markov switching
- Sequential Change Point Detection for PSK Modulation Switching
BibTeX
@article{muddin2026hybrid,
title = {{Hybrid IF–GNN–IF Framework for Suspected Fraud Detection in Bank Switching Transactions}},
author = {Zumam Muddin and Bambang Jokonowo and Afiyati},
journal = {Journal of Information Systems and Informatics},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1799},
url = {https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1799},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Hybrid IF–GNN–IF Framework for Suspected Fraud Detection in Bank Switching Transactions
AU - Zumam Muddin
AU - Bambang Jokonowo
AU - Afiyati
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/24
JO - Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
DO - 10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1799
UR - https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1799
AB - Fraud detection in financial transactions remains a major challenge in the banking industry, particularly in bank switching systems that process high transaction volumes and involve complex interactions among transaction entities. This study proposes a hybrid Isolation Forest–Graph Neural Network–Isolation Forest (IF–GNN–IF) framework to identify suspected fraudulent transactions in bank switching data. In the first stage, Isolation Forest detects potentially anomalous transactions and produces anomaly scores that are used to construct pseudo-labels. In the second stage, a Graph Neural Network learns relational patterns from a transaction graph by integrating original transaction attributes with the pseudo-labels. In the final stage, the learned graph embeddings are combined with the original transaction features and evaluated using a second Isolation Forest to generate final anomaly scores. The framework was evaluated using 71,873 bank switching transaction records and achieved an accuracy of 0.9668, precision of 0.9200, recall of 0.3681, and an F1-score of 0.5258. The high precision indicates that the framework effectively identifies suspicious transaction patterns. However, the relatively low recall suggests that some suspected fraud cases remain undetected. Therefore, further validation using confirmed fraud labels is necessary to assess the practical effectiveness and generalizability of the proposed framework in real-world banking environments.
SN - 2656-5935
SN - 2656-4882
ER -