Reported infant safety information and perinatal service engagement among birth partners and co-parents. An exploratory cross-sectional survey at a large UK teaching hospital
6 affiliations
- 1Department of Research and Development, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
- 2Department of Neonatology, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
- 3Department of Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
- 4Research Service, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- 5Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- 6Faculty of Science and Education, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
Abstract
Background: Infant mortality in the United Kingdom is higher in areas of socioeconomic deprivation and within several minority ethnic groups. Preventive strategies rely in part on safety information reaching families during the perinatal period. The extent to which birth partners and co-parents report exposure to that information is not well characterised.
Objective: To describe self-reported exposure to selected infant safety topics and reported engagement with perinatal services among birth partners and co-parents attending one large UK teaching hospital, and to explore variation across respondent profiles defined by ethnicity and parity.
Methods: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of 73 birth partners and co-parents was conducted at University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust between October 2022 and July 2023. Eight self-reported knowledge or awareness items and six self-reported engagement items were collected. Item-level proportions were summarised with Wilson 95 percent confidence intervals. Group comparisons used Fisher's exact test with Haldane-corrected prevalence ratios and Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment applied separately within each demographic comparison. Composite Knowledge Proportion Scores and Engagement Proportion Scores were computed for respondents with at least half of the relevant items answered. Internal consistency was estimated with the Kuder-Richardson 20 coefficient, association with Spearman's rank correlation, and group differences with the Mann–Whitney U test. Reporting follows the STROBE statement for cross-sectional studies.
Results: Reported exposure was highest for smoking risk (69.9 percent, 95 percent CI 58.6–79.2) and lowest for basic bystander life support (17.8 percent, 95 percent CI 10.7–28.1). Engagement was highest for NHS website use and post-birth breastfeeding support (both 61.6 percent, 95 percent CI 50.2–71.9) and lowest for antenatal classes (24.7 percent, 95 percent CI 16.2–35.6). Composite scales showed high internal consistency (KR-20 of 0.94 for knowledge, 0.93 for engagement). The two composite scores were strongly correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.965, p < 0.001). Ethnicity and parity were completely confounded in the usable sample, with all first-time parents identifying as White British and all respondents in the combined Other category identifying as experienced parents. Observed differences between these respondent profiles cannot be attributed independently to ethnicity or parity.
Conclusions: In this exploratory single-site sample, self-reported exposure to practical infant emergency-care topics was low. Substantial differences were observed between two contrasting respondent profiles, although the confounded design and small convenience sample do not support causal claims about ethnic inequities or infant mortality risk reduction. The findings are hypothesis-generating and support the case for larger, more diverse studies designed to separate the contributions of ethnicity, parity, and other social determinants.
Related
- Awareness, Attitudes and Self-Reported Practices Regarding Perinatal Mental Health and Depression Screening Among Healthcare Professionals in Serbia: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Survey
- Menopausal Symptom Burden and Self-Reported Poor Sleep Quality Among Japanese Working Women Aged 40 Years and Older: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study
- Tobacco and alcohol use in Germany: a cross-sectional study about associations with the self-reported ability to find, understand and judge health information
- Exploratory Food-Frequency Scores and Self-Reported Asthma in Italian Adults: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study
- Assessment of food safety knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practices among secondary school students in Bangladesh: A geographic information system-based cross-sectional study
BibTeX
@article{olakotan2026reported,
title = {{Reported infant safety information and perinatal service engagement among birth partners and co-parents. An exploratory cross-sectional survey at a large UK teaching hospital}},
author = {Olufisayo Olakotan and Modther Syed and Ahmed Abudraz and Camilla Benouali and Muhammad Ali and Nicole Chua and Su'ad Takar and Theubo Miller and William Dodwell and Fatima Tiamiyu Mogaji and Sanaa Rashwan and Elmansi Ahmed and Priya Sivakumaran and Megan O'Kerr and Samuel Atiku and Manjiri Khare and Thillagavathie Pillay},
journal = {Frontiers in Pediatrics},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fped.2026.1884421},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2026.1884421},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Reported infant safety information and perinatal service engagement among birth partners and co-parents. An exploratory cross-sectional survey at a large UK teaching hospital
AU - Olufisayo Olakotan
AU - Modther Syed
AU - Ahmed Abudraz
AU - Camilla Benouali
AU - Muhammad Ali
AU - Nicole Chua
AU - Su'ad Takar
AU - Theubo Miller
AU - William Dodwell
AU - Fatima Tiamiyu Mogaji
AU - Sanaa Rashwan
AU - Elmansi Ahmed
AU - Priya Sivakumaran
AU - Megan O'Kerr
AU - Samuel Atiku
AU - Manjiri Khare
AU - Thillagavathie Pillay
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/13
JO - Frontiers in Pediatrics
DO - 10.3389/fped.2026.1884421
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2026.1884421
AB - Background: Infant mortality in the United Kingdom is higher in areas of socioeconomic deprivation and within several minority ethnic groups. Preventive strategies rely in part on safety information reaching families during the perinatal period. The extent to which birth partners and co-parents report exposure to that information is not well characterised. Objective: To describe self-reported exposure to selected infant safety topics and reported engagement with perinatal services among birth partners and co-parents attending one large UK teaching hospital, and to explore variation across respondent profiles defined by ethnicity and parity. Methods: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of 73 birth partners and co-parents was conducted at University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust between October 2022 and July 2023. Eight self-reported knowledge or awareness items and six self-reported engagement items were collected. Item-level proportions were summarised with Wilson 95 percent confidence intervals. Group comparisons used Fisher's exact test with Haldane-corrected prevalence ratios and Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment applied separately within each demographic comparison. Composite Knowledge Proportion Scores and Engagement Proportion Scores were computed for respondents with at least half of the relevant items answered. Internal consistency was estimated with the Kuder-Richardson 20 coefficient, association with Spearman's rank correlation, and group differences with the Mann–Whitney U test. Reporting follows the STROBE statement for cross-sectional studies. Results: Reported exposure was highest for smoking risk (69.9 percent, 95 percent CI 58.6–79.2) and lowest for basic bystander life support (17.8 percent, 95 percent CI 10.7–28.1). Engagement was highest for NHS website use and post-birth breastfeeding support (both 61.6 percent, 95 percent CI 50.2–71.9) and lowest for antenatal classes (24.7 percent, 95 percent CI 16.2–35.6). Composite scales showed high internal consistency (KR-20 of 0.94 for knowledge, 0.93 for engagement). The two composite scores were strongly correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.965, p < 0.001). Ethnicity and parity were completely confounded in the usable sample, with all first-time parents identifying as White British and all respondents in the combined Other category identifying as experienced parents. Observed differences between these respondent profiles cannot be attributed independently to ethnicity or parity. Conclusions: In this exploratory single-site sample, self-reported exposure to practical infant emergency-care topics was low. Substantial differences were observed between two contrasting respondent profiles, although the confounded design and small convenience sample do not support causal claims about ethnic inequities or infant mortality risk reduction. The findings are hypothesis-generating and support the case for larger, more diverse studies designed to separate the contributions of ethnicity, parity, and other social determinants.
SN - 2296-2360
ER -