Standardized low-flow ventilation with PEEP maintenance during bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a pilot trial
Abstract
Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients can markedly increase airway resistance and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), limit effective tidal volume delivery, and provoke transient hypoxemia, hypercapnia, dynamic hyperinflation, and hemodynamic instability. However, per-procedural ventilator management remains heterogeneous. This single-center trial with before-and-after design assessed the feasibility and safety of implementing a standardized low-flow ventilation protocol, and characterized its physiological effects (particularly peak inspiratory pressure), during bronchoscopy in adults intubated and ventilated in volume-assist-control mode. During the observational phase ( n = 36), ventilator settings reflected usual practice (increased pressure alarm and reduced PEEP; no routine flow reduction). Following a 1-month training period, the intervention phase ( n = 35) implemented an inspiratory flow rate of 20 L/min, unchanged PEEP, and a reduced respiratory rate to achieve an I:E ratio of 1:2. Physiologic and ventilator data were automatically recorded at 1-min intervals. The primary endpoint was peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), a physiological endpoint reflecting the mechanical effect of the intervention. Secondary endpoints included minute ventilation (MV), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), oxygenation metrics, ventilator alarms, and hypotension, feasibility and procedural safety. PIP decreased substantially (45 [35, 65] cmH2O vs. 82 [59, 93] cmH 2 O; p < 0.001), resulting in a reduction in the time spent with pressure alarms (3.4% vs. 24%; p < 0.0001). However, MV (5.2 [4.6, 5.9] L/min vs. 6.4 [4.1, 7.3] L/min; p = 0.2), and EtCO2 (36 [30, 40] mmHg vs. 31 [27, 39] mmHg; p = 0.4) did not differ significantly. PEEP was maintained in the intervention group (8 [6, 10] cmH2O vs. 2 [0, 5] cmH 2 O; p = 0.001). The protocol was demonstrated short-term procedural safety signals, as average SpO 2 (98.9 [93.7, 100.0]% vs. 99.9 [96.8, 100.0], p = 0.082), and hypotension incidence (8.6% vs. 14%; p = 0.7) did not differ significantly. This protocol implementation study demonstrates that standardized low-flow ventilation with PEEP maintenance is feasible and safe during bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated patients, with a significant reduction in peak inspiratory pressure as a robust mechanical signal. Alveolar ventilation and hemodynamic tolerance were preserved. These findings support the conduct of further research to evaluate clinical outcomes.
Related
- Reply-Letter to the editor. Nutritional Goals in Mechanically Ventilated Children: Impact of a Standardized Enteral Protocol in a Tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
- Nutritional Goals in Mechanically Ventilated Children: Impact of a Standardized Enteral Protocol in a Tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
- Adverse events and associated factors during intra-hospital transport of mechanically ventilated intensive care patients
- A predictive model based on maternal immune-inflammatory markers for ARDS identification in mechanically ventilated late-preterm and term neonates
- Intubation and mechanical ventilation lead to an extensive expansion of VAP-associated bacterial species in respiratory secretions of ventilated pigs
BibTeX
@article{uguet2026standardized,
title = {{Standardized low-flow ventilation with PEEP maintenance during bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a pilot trial}},
author = {Jordan Uguet and Charles-Hervé Vacheron and Margot Bonnet and Annaelle Caillet and Emmanuelle Bertreau and Donatien de Marignan and Romain Fort and Chloé Gerbaud and Andrei Iordache and Guillaume Izaute and Lucille Jay and Mélanie Levrard and Jerome Lenoir and Fabrice Thiollière and Olivia Vassal and Florent Wallet and Bernard Allaouchiche and Auguste Dargent},
journal = {Journal of Intensive Care},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.1186/s40560-026-00895-2},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05751886v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Standardized low-flow ventilation with PEEP maintenance during bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a pilot trial
AU - Jordan Uguet
AU - Charles-Hervé Vacheron
AU - Margot Bonnet
AU - Annaelle Caillet
AU - Emmanuelle Bertreau
AU - Donatien de Marignan
AU - Romain Fort
AU - Chloé Gerbaud
AU - Andrei Iordache
AU - Guillaume Izaute
AU - Lucille Jay
AU - Mélanie Levrard
AU - Jerome Lenoir
AU - Fabrice Thiollière
AU - Olivia Vassal
AU - Florent Wallet
AU - Bernard Allaouchiche
AU - Auguste Dargent
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/21
JO - Journal of Intensive Care
DO - 10.1186/s40560-026-00895-2
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05751886v1
AB - Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients can markedly increase airway resistance and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), limit effective tidal volume delivery, and provoke transient hypoxemia, hypercapnia, dynamic hyperinflation, and hemodynamic instability. However, per-procedural ventilator management remains heterogeneous. This single-center trial with before-and-after design assessed the feasibility and safety of implementing a standardized low-flow ventilation protocol, and characterized its physiological effects (particularly peak inspiratory pressure), during bronchoscopy in adults intubated and ventilated in volume-assist-control mode. During the observational phase ( n = 36), ventilator settings reflected usual practice (increased pressure alarm and reduced PEEP; no routine flow reduction). Following a 1-month training period, the intervention phase ( n = 35) implemented an inspiratory flow rate of 20 L/min, unchanged PEEP, and a reduced respiratory rate to achieve an I:E ratio of 1:2. Physiologic and ventilator data were automatically recorded at 1-min intervals. The primary endpoint was peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), a physiological endpoint reflecting the mechanical effect of the intervention. Secondary endpoints included minute ventilation (MV), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), oxygenation metrics, ventilator alarms, and hypotension, feasibility and procedural safety. PIP decreased substantially (45 [35, 65] cmH2O vs. 82 [59, 93] cmH 2 O; p < 0.001), resulting in a reduction in the time spent with pressure alarms (3.4% vs. 24%; p < 0.0001). However, MV (5.2 [4.6, 5.9] L/min vs. 6.4 [4.1, 7.3] L/min; p = 0.2), and EtCO2 (36 [30, 40] mmHg vs. 31 [27, 39] mmHg; p = 0.4) did not differ significantly. PEEP was maintained in the intervention group (8 [6, 10] cmH2O vs. 2 [0, 5] cmH 2 O; p = 0.001). The protocol was demonstrated short-term procedural safety signals, as average SpO 2 (98.9 [93.7, 100.0]% vs. 99.9 [96.8, 100.0], p = 0.082), and hypotension incidence (8.6% vs. 14%; p = 0.7) did not differ significantly. This protocol implementation study demonstrates that standardized low-flow ventilation with PEEP maintenance is feasible and safe during bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated patients, with a significant reduction in peak inspiratory pressure as a robust mechanical signal. Alveolar ventilation and hemodynamic tolerance were preserved. These findings support the conduct of further research to evaluate clinical outcomes.
SN - 2052-0492
ER -