Motivations, experiences and perspectives of physicians in Germany regarding monitoring routines in coronary heart disease and post-stroke patients: A qualitative interview study
- 1Department of Primary Care, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- 2Institute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
Abstract
Chronic conditions, like coronary heart disease and post stroke status require lifelong care which negatively impacts upon patients’ quality of life and increases burden on the healthcare system. Monitoring routines in chronic conditions, including echocardiography and carotid ultrasound, should have evidence of benefit for the patient, detect deterioration and guide treatment adaptations. However, monitoring routines often lack evidence for intervals, specific tests or apparative diagnostic tools. The aim of this qualitative interview study was to identify the motivations, typical procedures and consequences of monitoring including echocardiography or carotid ultrasound in patients with coronary heart disease or stroke. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 physicians from three different specialties (general practitioners, cardiologists and neurologists) in two German states. Transcripts were analysed with thematic analysis. Physicians considered monitoring generally as beneficial for the patient and the health system, as it helps to detect and in consequence prevent disease progression through adaptation of therapy. Physicians discussed the risks of monitoring like overdiagnosis, overuse and overtreatment when examinations are done too frequently. Reasons and motivations given for echocardiography on coronary heart disease patients and carotid ultrasound monitoring on stroke patients were diverse and ranged from individual feelings and values, like personal assurance and safety concerns for patients, to external factors like financial incentives. Ultrasound examinations as routine monitoring procedures were considered as controversial. Physicians reported insufficient medical benefit for the patient and rarely saw therapeutic consequences. These regularly performed ultrasound examinations strain resources in daily practice and limit availability for acute care. In order to achieve a more efficient and balanced use of monitoring examinations, systematic changes are required at a political level. Further research is needed to evaluate monitoring routines and incorporate evidence-based recommendations into guidelines that optimize patient care and resource use.
Related
- A qualitative exploration of community health workers' roles and motivations in delivering care during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences and community perceptions in rural and urban Delhi, India.
- Physicians’ perspectives on the impact of echocardiographic feedback: a qualitative interview study
- Experiences and perspectives of patients visiting Dutch emergency departments on opioid (mis)use: a qualitative interview study
- Experiences and perspectives of Ayurvedic practitioners on non-communicable disease management in the UK: A qualitative study
- Stakeholder perspectives on telemedicine acceptance and experiences in Uganda: A qualitative study
BibTeX
@article{heisig2026motivations,
title = {{Motivations, experiences and perspectives of physicians in Germany regarding monitoring routines in coronary heart disease and post-stroke patients: A qualitative interview study}},
author = {Julia Heisig and Laura Rink and Carolin Gonschorek and Lydia König and Lisette Warkentin and Susann Hueber and Thomas Kühlein and Annika Viniol and Veronika van der Wardt},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0348530},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348530},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Motivations, experiences and perspectives of physicians in Germany regarding monitoring routines in coronary heart disease and post-stroke patients: A qualitative interview study
AU - Julia Heisig
AU - Laura Rink
AU - Carolin Gonschorek
AU - Lydia König
AU - Lisette Warkentin
AU - Susann Hueber
AU - Thomas Kühlein
AU - Annika Viniol
AU - Veronika van der Wardt
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/11
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0348530
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348530
AB - Chronic conditions, like coronary heart disease and post stroke status require lifelong care which negatively impacts upon patients’ quality of life and increases burden on the healthcare system. Monitoring routines in chronic conditions, including echocardiography and carotid ultrasound, should have evidence of benefit for the patient, detect deterioration and guide treatment adaptations. However, monitoring routines often lack evidence for intervals, specific tests or apparative diagnostic tools. The aim of this qualitative interview study was to identify the motivations, typical procedures and consequences of monitoring including echocardiography or carotid ultrasound in patients with coronary heart disease or stroke. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 physicians from three different specialties (general practitioners, cardiologists and neurologists) in two German states. Transcripts were analysed with thematic analysis. Physicians considered monitoring generally as beneficial for the patient and the health system, as it helps to detect and in consequence prevent disease progression through adaptation of therapy. Physicians discussed the risks of monitoring like overdiagnosis, overuse and overtreatment when examinations are done too frequently. Reasons and motivations given for echocardiography on coronary heart disease patients and carotid ultrasound monitoring on stroke patients were diverse and ranged from individual feelings and values, like personal assurance and safety concerns for patients, to external factors like financial incentives. Ultrasound examinations as routine monitoring procedures were considered as controversial. Physicians reported insufficient medical benefit for the patient and rarely saw therapeutic consequences. These regularly performed ultrasound examinations strain resources in daily practice and limit availability for acute care. In order to achieve a more efficient and balanced use of monitoring examinations, systematic changes are required at a political level. Further research is needed to evaluate monitoring routines and incorporate evidence-based recommendations into guidelines that optimize patient care and resource use.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -