“It absolutely enlarged my world”: Exploring in-person and virtual performing arts programming for dementia care dyads
- 1Department of Psychology, The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States of America
- 2Center for Applied Research in Dementia, Lititz, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- 3Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, New York, New York, United States of America
Abstract
Arts-based programs are increasingly used to support people living with dementia and their care partners; however, there has been a limited focus on multi-modal, participatory performing arts programs offered in both virtual and in-person formats. We completed an evaluation of the Lincoln Center Moments (LCM) program, a free dyadic arts program grounded in four pillars: Validation/Personhood, Social Engagement, Self-Expression, and Artistic Stimulation. An exploratory mixed-methods program evaluation was conducted with 23 dyads (N = 46). Quantitative measures included program satisfaction, social engagement, and arts engagement. Post-session interviews were coded using an evaluative framework aligned with program pillars. Program satisfaction was high across both modalities. Care-partner-reported arts engagement for PLWD increased from pre- to post-season among the in-person subgroup but not the virtual subgroup; modality-specific analyses were exploratory. Social engagement scores were similar across formats, although in-person attendees were more likely to report friendships with others. Qualitative data supported all four LCM pillars. LCM was perceived as engaging and supportive by participants in both virtual and in-person settings. Participants who were initially hesitant to engage described greater comfort and willingness to participate over time. Participant feedback suggests that programs like LCM may provide inclusive, accessible spaces for creative engagement – particularly for those unable to attend mainstream performances. Future researchers should explore hybrid delivery formats and assess longer-term dyadic outcomes.
Related
- Vascular drivers of cerebrospinal fluid movement and enlarged perivascular spaces
- Enlarged hind femora as active defensive weapons in Cretaceous stick insects
- Autism with social anxiety is associated with acquiescent behaviors and enlarged amygdala volume.
- Hearing Loss and Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct (EVA) in a Patient Negative for Canonical EVA Genes: Potential Role of SCD5
- Enlarged brain perivascular spaces in chronic schizophrenia but not in first-episode psychosis: a cross-sectional study
BibTeX
@article{walker2026absolutely,
title = {{“It absolutely enlarged my world”: Exploring in-person and virtual performing arts programming for dementia care dyads}},
author = {Ruth V. Walker and Evan G. Shelton and Cameron J. Camp and Miranda Hoffner and Katie J. Fanning},
journal = {PLOS Mental Health},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pmen.0000771},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmen.0000771},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - “It absolutely enlarged my world”: Exploring in-person and virtual performing arts programming for dementia care dyads
AU - Ruth V. Walker
AU - Evan G. Shelton
AU - Cameron J. Camp
AU - Miranda Hoffner
AU - Katie J. Fanning
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - PLOS Mental Health
DO - 10.1371/journal.pmen.0000771
UR - https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmen.0000771
AB - Arts-based programs are increasingly used to support people living with dementia and their care partners; however, there has been a limited focus on multi-modal, participatory performing arts programs offered in both virtual and in-person formats. We completed an evaluation of the Lincoln Center Moments (LCM) program, a free dyadic arts program grounded in four pillars: Validation/Personhood, Social Engagement, Self-Expression, and Artistic Stimulation. An exploratory mixed-methods program evaluation was conducted with 23 dyads (N = 46). Quantitative measures included program satisfaction, social engagement, and arts engagement. Post-session interviews were coded using an evaluative framework aligned with program pillars. Program satisfaction was high across both modalities. Care-partner-reported arts engagement for PLWD increased from pre- to post-season among the in-person subgroup but not the virtual subgroup; modality-specific analyses were exploratory. Social engagement scores were similar across formats, although in-person attendees were more likely to report friendships with others. Qualitative data supported all four LCM pillars. LCM was perceived as engaging and supportive by participants in both virtual and in-person settings. Participants who were initially hesitant to engage described greater comfort and willingness to participate over time. Participant feedback suggests that programs like LCM may provide inclusive, accessible spaces for creative engagement – particularly for those unable to attend mainstream performances. Future researchers should explore hybrid delivery formats and assess longer-term dyadic outcomes.
SN - 2837-8156
ER -