PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv
Feeling Left Behind? Territorial Disadvantage, Well-Being and Cohesion across European Regions
Abstract
Left-behind places are usually identified using economic, demographic and accessibility indicators, but these may not align with well-being and social cohesion. We combine ten years of territorial indicators with subjective measures derived from georeferenced social-media data for over 1,200 NUTS-3 regions in 28 European countries (2013-2023). Regional profiles and within-between panel models reveal uneven relationships: disadvantaged regions can display contrasting levels of well-being and cohesion, national context alters cross-country associations, and between-region differences diverge from within-region change. The findings show that aggregate measures conceal distinct forms and trajectories of territorial disadvantage.
Related
- Feeling the generalised rough SABR boundary
- Feeling Moved Mediates the Enjoyment of Emotional Images and Music
- The animal body plan revisited in light of the failure of local tissue cohesion in cancer
- A domain knowledge-enhanced lightweight transformer for automatic identification of land-use conflicts in territorial spatial planning texts
- Alexandrov Regions
BibTeX
@misc{iacus2026feeling,
title = {{Feeling Left Behind? Territorial Disadvantage, Well-Being and Cohesion across European Regions}},
author = {Stefano Maria Iacus and Giuseppe Porro and Haodong Qi and Devika Jain},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.37866},
eprint = {2609.37866},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37866},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Feeling Left Behind? Territorial Disadvantage, Well-Being and Cohesion across European Regions
AU - Stefano Maria Iacus
AU - Giuseppe Porro
AU - Haodong Qi
AU - Devika Jain
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/29
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.37866
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37866
AB - Left-behind places are usually identified using economic, demographic and accessibility indicators, but these may not align with well-being and social cohesion. We combine ten years of territorial indicators with subjective measures derived from georeferenced social-media data for over 1,200 NUTS-3 regions in 28 European countries (2013-2023). Regional profiles and within-between panel models reveal uneven relationships: disadvantaged regions can display contrasting levels of well-being and cohesion, national context alters cross-country associations, and between-region differences diverge from within-region change. The findings show that aggregate measures conceal distinct forms and trajectories of territorial disadvantage.
ER -