Grounding-Specific Effects of Valence in Word Recognition: Evidence from Pain-Related Language.
Abstract
Affective valence is widely regarded as a core organizing dimension in word recognition, yet findings on its role remain inconsistent. We argue that this inconsistency reflects a longstanding operationalization of valence as a domain-general signal. Using pain-related language as a test case, where physical and social pain words share conceptual and affective features but diverge in their dominant experiential grounding, we examined whether valence differentially modulates lexical access as a function of grounding type. Reaction times from a lexical decision task were modeled using multiple regression, testing interactions between pain type and valence alongside other semantic and lexical predictors. Greater negative valence predicted faster lexical access for social pain words, whereas no valence effect emerged for physical pain words, and this dissociation was statistically significant. No other predictor showed a significant interaction with pain type. These findings indicate that valence operates as a grounding-specific facilitator rather than a domain-general signal, and align with multiple representation frameworks in which affective, sensorimotor, and social dimensions interactively ground conceptual knowledge.
Related
- Emotional Modulation of Face Working Memory Precision in Specific Learning Disorders: Valence Flattening and Mnemonic Distortions
- Analysis and improvement of surface electromyography-based American Sign Language hand gesture recognition
- Decoding antibody-antigen recognition: the BL8 language and its application in calibrating deep learning predictions
- Unveiling structural determinants of peptide recognition by public and private SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell receptors.
- A closed-loop language-model agent for target-specific multi-objective hit-to-lead optimization
BibTeX
@misc{borelli2026groundingspecific,
title = {{Grounding-Specific Effects of Valence in Word Recognition: Evidence from Pain-Related Language.}},
author = {Eleonora Borelli and Riccardo Costantini and Elena Bandieri and Mario Luppi and Leonardo Potenza and Francesca Pesciarelli},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/4w57f_v2},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4w57f_v2/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Grounding-Specific Effects of Valence in Word Recognition: Evidence from Pain-Related Language.
AU - Eleonora Borelli
AU - Riccardo Costantini
AU - Elena Bandieri
AU - Mario Luppi
AU - Leonardo Potenza
AU - Francesca Pesciarelli
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/4w57f_v2
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4w57f_v2/
AB - Affective valence is widely regarded as a core organizing dimension in word recognition, yet findings on its role remain inconsistent. We argue that this inconsistency reflects a longstanding operationalization of valence as a domain-general signal. Using pain-related language as a test case, where physical and social pain words share conceptual and affective features but diverge in their dominant experiential grounding, we examined whether valence differentially modulates lexical access as a function of grounding type. Reaction times from a lexical decision task were modeled using multiple regression, testing interactions between pain type and valence alongside other semantic and lexical predictors. Greater negative valence predicted faster lexical access for social pain words, whereas no valence effect emerged for physical pain words, and this dissociation was statistically significant. No other predictor showed a significant interaction with pain type. These findings indicate that valence operates as a grounding-specific facilitator rather than a domain-general signal, and align with multiple representation frameworks in which affective, sensorimotor, and social dimensions interactively ground conceptual knowledge.
ER -