Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Oncology

A comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/MR, 18F-FDG PET/CT and biochemical monitoring in neuroendocrine prostate cancer: a case report

  1. 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xin Qiao Hospital, Army Medical University

Abstract

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is a rare, aggressive subtype with hormonal resistance and poor prognosis. Traditional serum biomarkers such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) are often present at low or normal levels, making it difficult to accurately reflect disease burden and progression, and thus renders them unsuitable for dynamically monitoring NEPC. We report a 64-year-old man with mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the prostate, with bladder involvement. The adenocarcinoma component had a Gleason score of 5 + 4 = 9. Pretreatment ¹⁸ F‑FDG PET/CT showed uptake in prostatic and bladder lesions, while a sclerotic lesion at the sixth thoracic vertebra exhibited no FDG avidity. After chemotherapy, radiotherapy and long-term treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with bicalutamide, PSA levels became undetectable and NSE levels remained within the normal range with no significant change from baseline. However, follow‑up ⁶⁸ Ga‑PSMA PET/MR revealed intense persistent uptake in the prostate and bladder and new avid lesions in the sixth thoracic vertebra and both scapulae. At the most recent follow-up, ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/MR scan revealed decreased PSMA uptake in the prostate and bone lesions, as well as increased PSMA uptake in the bladder. A repeat bladder biopsy confirmed chronic inflammation rather than tumor progression. PSA and NSE levels remained largely unchanged during follow-up, while the clinical significance of the ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET findings required further assessment. This case demonstrates that the results of multi-tracer PET scans in patients with NEPC should be interpreted with caution and considered alongside the clinical course and biochemical markers. When necessary, a definitive diagnosis should be confirmed by histopathology.

Related

  1. The Enemy of My Enemy: Two Cases of De Novo Metastatic Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer with BRCA2 Alterations and Brain Metastases.
    Mads Fallesen Kjer, Mads Hvid Poulsen, Sanne Kjær-Frifeldt +3
    International journal of molecular sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Metastatic prostate cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation and liver metastases: prognosis and response to platinum-based chemotherapy.
    Christian W Schaaf, G von Amsberg, J J Werner +14
    World journal of urologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT on the management of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer.
    Sohyun Park, Tae-Sung Kim, Sung Uk Lee +3
    Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyOncologyEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Impact of reduced scan extent on tumor detection in ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.
    Falk Gühne, Alexander Küppers, Christian Kühnel +2
    BMC medical imagingPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMCDOAJ
  5. Prognostic value of postoperative dynamic PNI trajectories for biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer: a longitudinal trajectory clustering study.
    Bo Yu, Xuchao Dai, Jianguo Zhu
    Frontiers in nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{deng2026comparison,
  title = {{A comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/MR, 18F-FDG PET/CT and biochemical monitoring in neuroendocrine prostate cancer: a case report}},
  author = {Yuqi Deng and Xin Li and Jie Hu and Rui Xue and Song Zhang},
  journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1935144},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1935144/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/MR, 18F-FDG PET/CT and biochemical monitoring in neuroendocrine prostate cancer: a case report
AU  - Yuqi Deng
AU  - Xin Li
AU  - Jie Hu
AU  - Rui Xue
AU  - Song Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Frontiers in Oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1935144
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1935144/full
AB  - Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is a rare, aggressive subtype with hormonal resistance and poor prognosis. Traditional serum biomarkers such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) are often present at low or normal levels, making it difficult to accurately reflect disease burden and progression, and thus renders them unsuitable for dynamically monitoring NEPC. We report a 64-year-old man with mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the prostate, with bladder involvement. The adenocarcinoma component had a Gleason score of 5 + 4 = 9. Pretreatment ¹⁸ F‑FDG PET/CT showed uptake in prostatic and bladder lesions, while a sclerotic lesion at the sixth thoracic vertebra exhibited no FDG avidity. After chemotherapy, radiotherapy and long-term treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with bicalutamide, PSA levels became undetectable and NSE levels remained within the normal range with no significant change from baseline. However, follow‑up ⁶⁸ Ga‑PSMA PET/MR revealed intense persistent uptake in the prostate and bladder and new avid lesions in the sixth thoracic vertebra and both scapulae. At the most recent follow-up, ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/MR scan revealed decreased PSMA uptake in the prostate and bone lesions, as well as increased PSMA uptake in the bladder. A repeat bladder biopsy confirmed chronic inflammation rather than tumor progression. PSA and NSE levels remained largely unchanged during follow-up, while the clinical significance of the ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET findings required further assessment. This case demonstrates that the results of multi-tracer PET scans in patients with NEPC should be interpreted with caution and considered alongside the clinical course and biochemical markers. When necessary, a definitive diagnosis should be confirmed by histopathology.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -