Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS Computational Biology
Ten simple rules for suggesting reviewers during a paper submission
4 affiliations
- 1Ray and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- 2BIOVIA, Dassault Systèmes, San Diego, California, United States of America
- 3SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
- 4Oxford University Press, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Related
- A Simple Temperature‐Controlled Method for Preserving Viability in Human Pluripotent Stem Cell‐Derived Retinal Organoids During Shipment
- ENflorA: a flexible tool for the bulk submission of next generation sequencing data to the European Nucleotide Archive.
- AI discovery of sequence rules for RNA polymerase II pausing revises the pause-release model of gene activation
- Signal peptidase complexes set species-specific rules for signal peptide cleavage
- Beyond Dmax and DC50: A simple tool to evaluate the complex PROTAC-mediated kinetic degradation dynamics
BibTeX
@article{schwartz2026simple,
title = {{Ten simple rules for suggesting reviewers during a paper submission}},
author = {Russell Schwartz and Scott Markel and Patricia M. Palagi and B. F. Francis Ouellette},
journal = {PLOS Computational Biology},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014780},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014780},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Ten simple rules for suggesting reviewers during a paper submission
AU - Russell Schwartz
AU - Scott Markel
AU - Patricia M. Palagi
AU - B. F. Francis Ouellette
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/16
JO - PLOS Computational Biology
DO - 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014780
UR - https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014780
SN - 1553-7358
ER -