Defining the islet: a minimum size threshold and opportunities for standardization
- 1Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago , , ,
Abstract
Although islets play a central role in the pathogenesis of diabetes, they still lack a universally accepted definition beyond being large clusters of endocrine cells within the pancreas. Previous definitions have primarily relied on arbitrary size or cell-count thresholds rather than biologically meaningful criteria. As a result, this longstanding ambiguity has recently prompted the introduction of the term endocrine objects (EOs), which replaces the traditional distinction among islets, small endocrine cell clusters, and solitary endocrine cells with a unified, continuous size-based classification. This raises a fundamental question: what biologically meaningful features distinguish islets from their smaller endocrine counterparts? In our recent study of volumetric intraislet vascularization among various mammalian species including humans, we defined the smallest islet size that receives direct internal vascularization as being ~40 µm in diameter. Considering that the islet has been described as highly vascularized, the presence or absence of direct vascularization should fairly distinguish islets from non-islet single endocrine cells and small cell clusters. In addition to variability in islet size thresholds, the lack of standardized analytical approaches has further complicated meaningful comparisons across islet studies. This perspective aims to address these limitations through discussion of islet effective diameter, islet sampling, and comparing 2D and 3D analytical methods.
Related
- Defining Success in Ptosis Surgery: Outcome Heterogeneity and Priorities for Standardization
- L-Histidine alleviates tacrolimus-induced islet dysfunction via the gut-pancreas axis
- Cysteine promotes islet α-cell glucagon secretion by limiting oxidative inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels
- Insulinoma in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Becoming Clinically Evident in the Setting of Acute Kidney Injury: A Case with a Postoperative Deterioration of the Glucose Metabolism and a Quantitative Islet Cell Analysis
- How Many Factors Underlie the WAIS-5? Evidence From the Australian and New Zealand Standardization Sample.
BibTeX
@article{tollefson2026defining,
title = {{Defining the islet: a minimum size threshold and opportunities for standardization}},
author = {Alex M. Tollefson and Manami Hara},
journal = {Frontiers in endocrinology},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.3389/fendo.2026.1927749},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661495},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Defining the islet: a minimum size threshold and opportunities for standardization
AU - Alex M. Tollefson
AU - Manami Hara
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
JO - Frontiers in endocrinology
DO - 10.3389/fendo.2026.1927749
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661495
AB - Although islets play a central role in the pathogenesis of diabetes, they still lack a universally accepted definition beyond being large clusters of endocrine cells within the pancreas. Previous definitions have primarily relied on arbitrary size or cell-count thresholds rather than biologically meaningful criteria. As a result, this longstanding ambiguity has recently prompted the introduction of the term endocrine objects (EOs), which replaces the traditional distinction among islets, small endocrine cell clusters, and solitary endocrine cells with a unified, continuous size-based classification. This raises a fundamental question: what biologically meaningful features distinguish islets from their smaller endocrine counterparts? In our recent study of volumetric intraislet vascularization among various mammalian species including humans, we defined the smallest islet size that receives direct internal vascularization as being ~40 µm in diameter. Considering that the islet has been described as highly vascularized, the presence or absence of direct vascularization should fairly distinguish islets from non-islet single endocrine cells and small cell clusters. In addition to variability in islet size thresholds, the lack of standardized analytical approaches has further complicated meaningful comparisons across islet studies. This perspective aims to address these limitations through discussion of islet effective diameter, islet sampling, and comparing 2D and 3D analytical methods.
SN - 1664-2392
ER -