Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,067 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Pitch Metrics and the Trade-Offs Between Elbow Injury and Performance in Major League Baseball Pitchers

  1. 1American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  2. 2Andrews Sports Medicine & Orthopaedic Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Abstract

Background: Elbow injuries among baseball pitchers continue to rise, with increasing emphasis on velocity, spin, and related pitch metrics as likely contributors. However, the trade-offs between performance and injury burden are not well understood. Purpose: To evaluate relationships between pitch metrics, elbow injury burden, and performance in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers, and to assess trade-offs between these outcomes. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Publicly available pitch metrics, performance measures, and injury data were analyzed for MLB pitchers during the 2022 to 2025 regular seasons. Pitch metrics included velocity, spin rate, vertical and horizontal movement, release characteristics, pitch-type usage, and pitch quality models (Pitching+, Stuff+, and Location+). Pitch arsenal diversity was quantified using the effective number of pitch types (N eff ). Outcomes included elbow injury burden (days on the injured list due to elbow injuries [ElbowDays]), expected earned run average (xERA), and FanGraphs wins above replacement (fWAR). Regression models evaluated associations between pitch metrics and outcomes, adjusting for age, service time, and role (starter/reliever), with effects standardized per standard deviation. Results: Among 406 pitchers, velocity showed the most consistent effects. A 1-SD increase in average velocity was associated with 36% greater ElbowDays alongside improved performance (–4% xERA; +0.18 fWAR). Similar trade-offs were observed for 4-seam velocity, sinker velocity, and 4-seam Pitching+. Increased spin rate, induced vertical break, and arm angle were associated with increased ElbowDays but limited or inconsistent performance benefits. Greater arsenal diversity (N eff ) was associated with reduced ElbowDays (–26%) but slightly worse xERA (+4%) and no significant change in fWAR. Higher sinker usage was associated with reduced ElbowDays (–15%) without significant performance effects. Conclusion: Velocity, spin, and related metrics are associated with improved MLB pitching performance but increased elbow injury burden, indicating a measurable performance-injury trade-off. In contrast, greater arsenal diversity, increased sinker usage, and lower arm angle may improve durability with minimal performance cost. Future research examining the contextual components of pitch quality models beyond raw metrics is warranted.

Related

  1. Game-Level Temporal Patterns Identify Optimal Preinjury Windows for Shoulder and Elbow Injuries in Major League Baseball Pitchers
    Louis S. Kang, Sophia Mavrommatis, Jason G. Ina +4
    Orthopaedic journal of sports medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  2. Effects of keiser-assisted Nordic hamstring curl training on hamstring flexibility, mechanical properties, and pitching performance in high school baseball pitchers
    Ye-Jun Han, Hyun Ahn, Sea-Hyun Bae +1
    Physical activity and nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. The Effect of a Bioactive Fabric Sleeve on Flexor-Pronator Recovery in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers: A Pilot Study
    Michael T Freehill, Alex Lencioni, Matthew Valencia +3
    International journal of sports physical therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  4. Arm Angle Moderates the Association Between Fastball Usage and Elbow/Forearm Injury in MLB Pitchers
    C. Richards, D. T. La Salle, O. Vila Dieguez +1
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull text1 citedGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  5. Slider Horizontal Movement and Arm Angle are Associated with Elbow and Forearm Injury Incidence in MLB Pitchers
    C. Richards, D. T. La Salle, O. Vila Dieguez +1
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{phd2026pitch,
  title = {{Pitch Metrics and the Trade-Offs Between Elbow Injury and Performance in Major League Baseball Pitchers}},
  author = {Jonathan S. Slowik PhD and Dev Rupani and J. Bradford Hall BS and Jeffrey R. Dugas MD and Glenn S. Fleisig PhD},
  journal = {Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1177/23259671261490766},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261490766},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Pitch Metrics and the Trade-Offs Between Elbow Injury and Performance in Major League Baseball Pitchers
AU  - Jonathan S. Slowik PhD
AU  - Dev Rupani
AU  - J. Bradford Hall BS
AU  - Jeffrey R. Dugas MD
AU  - Glenn S. Fleisig PhD
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
DO  - 10.1177/23259671261490766
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261490766
AB  - Background: Elbow injuries among baseball pitchers continue to rise, with increasing emphasis on velocity, spin, and related pitch metrics as likely contributors. However, the trade-offs between performance and injury burden are not well understood. Purpose: To evaluate relationships between pitch metrics, elbow injury burden, and performance in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers, and to assess trade-offs between these outcomes. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Publicly available pitch metrics, performance measures, and injury data were analyzed for MLB pitchers during the 2022 to 2025 regular seasons. Pitch metrics included velocity, spin rate, vertical and horizontal movement, release characteristics, pitch-type usage, and pitch quality models (Pitching+, Stuff+, and Location+). Pitch arsenal diversity was quantified using the effective number of pitch types (N eff ). Outcomes included elbow injury burden (days on the injured list due to elbow injuries [ElbowDays]), expected earned run average (xERA), and FanGraphs wins above replacement (fWAR). Regression models evaluated associations between pitch metrics and outcomes, adjusting for age, service time, and role (starter/reliever), with effects standardized per standard deviation. Results: Among 406 pitchers, velocity showed the most consistent effects. A 1-SD increase in average velocity was associated with 36% greater ElbowDays alongside improved performance (–4% xERA; +0.18 fWAR). Similar trade-offs were observed for 4-seam velocity, sinker velocity, and 4-seam Pitching+. Increased spin rate, induced vertical break, and arm angle were associated with increased ElbowDays but limited or inconsistent performance benefits. Greater arsenal diversity (N eff ) was associated with reduced ElbowDays (–26%) but slightly worse xERA (+4%) and no significant change in fWAR. Higher sinker usage was associated with reduced ElbowDays (–15%) without significant performance effects. Conclusion: Velocity, spin, and related metrics are associated with improved MLB pitching performance but increased elbow injury burden, indicating a measurable performance-injury trade-off. In contrast, greater arsenal diversity, increased sinker usage, and lower arm angle may improve durability with minimal performance cost. Future research examining the contextual components of pitch quality models beyond raw metrics is warranted.
SN  - 2325-9671
ER  -