Total Integration – reviving the Biomedical Platform as an analytical tool
Abstract
This collaboratively written article develops and updates Keating and Cambrosio’s concept of the ‘biomedical platform’ to analyse its relevance in an era of globalised, data-intensive biomedicine. Since the turn of the 21st century, platforms—understood as socio-technical arrangements integrating materials, practices, standards, and regulatory forms—have become indispensable “workbenches” connecting multiple levels of contemporary bio-science, surveillance, and governance. The article demonstrates the urgent need for social scientific and historical perspectives to make sense of the proliferation, interdependency, and political economy of platforms across scales, from laboratory techniques to global health infrastructures. Through case studies of microbial typing, vaccine innovation, and epidemiological surveillance, the article details how platforms operate through interlayering and “plug-and-play” logics that standardize inputs and outputs while enabling rapid expansion into new domains. These dynamics have driven major advances, including high-throughput genomic surveillance, adaptable viral vector and mRNA vaccine platforms, and increasingly integrated data ecosystems for epidemic intelligence. At the same time, platforms generate new forms of power, exclusion, and inequality. Proprietary architectures, gatekeeping between competing systems, and the assetization of data and technologies concentrate control among a limited set of public-private actors, while marginalising resource-poor settings and alternative approaches. We argue that platform interdependency is now a defining feature of 21st-century biomedicine and global health, restructuring transnational knowledge production, labour, and governance. While platforms offer significant efficiencies, they also risk privileging standardization over contextual understanding and reinforcing global disparities. We call for renewed social scientific attention to platform ecosystems, their hegemonic tendencies, and emerging possibilities for more equitable and accountable forms of platform-based biomedicine.
Related
- AI semantics for biomedical data integration
- PromptBio: An Agentic Platform for End-to-End Computational Biomedical Research
- DiffRhyShiny: A Benchmarking-Informed Platform for Differential Rhythmicity Analysis with Dependence-Aware Evidence Integration
- An integration-free CRISPR platform for genetic dissection of respiratory virus host dependencies in human nasal epithelium
- BiomiX 3.0: A user-friendly platform for democratized multi-omics integration with graph-based learning
BibTeX
@misc{bresalier2026total,
title = {{Total Integration – reviving the Biomedical Platform as an analytical tool}},
author = {Michael Bresalier and Gareth Millward and Adebisi Adenipekun and Camille Besombes and Lukas Engelmann and Ana Estrada-Jaramillo and Frédéric Keck and Laurence Monnais and Samantha Vanderslott and Roberta Raffaetà and Marius Salgado Hansen and Claas Kirchhelle},
howpublished = {HAL},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05770858v1},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Total Integration – reviving the Biomedical Platform as an analytical tool
AU - Michael Bresalier
AU - Gareth Millward
AU - Adebisi Adenipekun
AU - Camille Besombes
AU - Lukas Engelmann
AU - Ana Estrada-Jaramillo
AU - Frédéric Keck
AU - Laurence Monnais
AU - Samantha Vanderslott
AU - Roberta Raffaetà
AU - Marius Salgado Hansen
AU - Claas Kirchhelle
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
PB - HAL
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05770858v1
AB - This collaboratively written article develops and updates Keating and Cambrosio’s concept of the ‘biomedical platform’ to analyse its relevance in an era of globalised, data-intensive biomedicine. Since the turn of the 21st century, platforms—understood as socio-technical arrangements integrating materials, practices, standards, and regulatory forms—have become indispensable “workbenches” connecting multiple levels of contemporary bio-science, surveillance, and governance. The article demonstrates the urgent need for social scientific and historical perspectives to make sense of the proliferation, interdependency, and political economy of platforms across scales, from laboratory techniques to global health infrastructures. Through case studies of microbial typing, vaccine innovation, and epidemiological surveillance, the article details how platforms operate through interlayering and “plug-and-play” logics that standardize inputs and outputs while enabling rapid expansion into new domains. These dynamics have driven major advances, including high-throughput genomic surveillance, adaptable viral vector and mRNA vaccine platforms, and increasingly integrated data ecosystems for epidemic intelligence. At the same time, platforms generate new forms of power, exclusion, and inequality. Proprietary architectures, gatekeeping between competing systems, and the assetization of data and technologies concentrate control among a limited set of public-private actors, while marginalising resource-poor settings and alternative approaches. We argue that platform interdependency is now a defining feature of 21st-century biomedicine and global health, restructuring transnational knowledge production, labour, and governance. While platforms offer significant efficiencies, they also risk privileging standardization over contextual understanding and reinforcing global disparities. We call for renewed social scientific attention to platform ecosystems, their hegemonic tendencies, and emerging possibilities for more equitable and accountable forms of platform-based biomedicine.
ER -