Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease

Pharmacological interventions for reducing the risk of cognitive decline and dementia after stroke/transient ischemic attack: A systematic review.

  1. 1Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  2. 2Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: [email protected].

Abstract

Background

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Advances in stroke care have improved survival and recovery, but it remains unclear whether pharmacological treatments can prevent long-term consequences including cognitive decline and dementia. This systematic review examined whether pharmacological interventions reduce the risk of cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia in adults with a history of stroke or symptomatic transient ischemic attack (TIA).Methods

We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and Cochrane Central from inception to January 23, 2025, for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible studies included adults with prior stroke or symptomatic TIA receiving pharmacological interventions, blood pressure-lowering, antithrombotic, and lipid-lowering drugs, compared with placebo, no treatment, or usual care. Primary outcomes were incident dementia, MCI, and cognitive decline assessed at least three months post-event. Methodological quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2, and certainty of evidence using GRADE. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251000825).Results

Of 1343 records screened, 8 systematic reviews met inclusion criteria. The most comprehensive systematic review, including all relevant RCTs, was selected for detailed data extraction. Certainty of evidence was mostly low, with a few exceptions of moderate to high certainty. Across drug classes and outcomes, pharmacological interventions generally showed no meaningful reductions in dementia, MCI, and cognitive decline over a mean follow-up of 2.0-4.9 years.Conclusions

Current evidence does not support pharmacological interventions after a cerebrovascular event for reducing risk of cognitive decline, MCI, or dementia. Further high-quality studies with longer follow-ups are needed.

Related

  1. Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis
    Baofang Zhang, Xuanling Li, Qian Zhao +7
    Frontiers in aging neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Home-based non-pharmacological interventions for cognition and diabetes self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review
    Xiaomin Lu, Ssu-Chi Chen, Wing Fai Yeung +2
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Endocrinology & metabolismCrossref
  3. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of non-pharmacological interventions in improving psychological status and sleep quality among hemodialysis patients
    Minjie Liu, Haixia Chen, Yunyun Liu +5
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. Are Asymmetry-Focused Training Interventions More Effective than General Programs in Reducing Interlimb Asymmetries and Improving Athletic Performance? A Systematic Review
    Antonio Martos-Arregui, Iago Rojas-Cepero, Xing Zhang +3
    Sports Medicine - OpenPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Interventions for Cognitive Impairment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Umbrella Review of Pharmacological and Lifestyle Strategies, Mechanisms, and Clinical Implications
    H. I. Ninsiima, E. E. Daniel, N. I. Kisakye +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{rosenau2026pharmacological,
  title = {{Pharmacological interventions for reducing the risk of cognitive decline and dementia after stroke/transient ischemic attack: A systematic review.}},
  author = {Colin Rosenau and Lieke Bakker and Veerle van Gils and Sebastian Köhler and Kay Deckers},
  journal = {The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100680},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42863385},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Pharmacological interventions for reducing the risk of cognitive decline and dementia after stroke/transient ischemic attack: A systematic review.
AU  - Colin Rosenau
AU  - Lieke Bakker
AU  - Veerle van Gils
AU  - Sebastian Köhler
AU  - Kay Deckers
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease
DO  - 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100680
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42863385
AB  - Background  Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Advances in stroke care have improved survival and recovery, but it remains unclear whether pharmacological treatments can prevent long-term consequences including cognitive decline and dementia. This systematic review examined whether pharmacological interventions reduce the risk of cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia in adults with a history of stroke or symptomatic transient ischemic attack (TIA).Methods  We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and Cochrane Central from inception to January 23, 2025, for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible studies included adults with prior stroke or symptomatic TIA receiving pharmacological interventions, blood pressure-lowering, antithrombotic, and lipid-lowering drugs, compared with placebo, no treatment, or usual care. Primary outcomes were incident dementia, MCI, and cognitive decline assessed at least three months post-event. Methodological quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2, and certainty of evidence using GRADE. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251000825).Results  Of 1343 records screened, 8 systematic reviews met inclusion criteria. The most comprehensive systematic review, including all relevant RCTs, was selected for detailed data extraction. Certainty of evidence was mostly low, with a few exceptions of moderate to high certainty. Across drug classes and outcomes, pharmacological interventions generally showed no meaningful reductions in dementia, MCI, and cognitive decline over a mean follow-up of 2.0-4.9 years.Conclusions  Current evidence does not support pharmacological interventions after a cerebrovascular event for reducing risk of cognitive decline, MCI, or dementia. Further high-quality studies with longer follow-ups are needed.
SN  - 2426-0266
ER  -