Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYInfectious disease reports

How Endpoint Definitions Shape Epidemiologic Inference on Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis from Lima, Peru.

  1. 1Facultad de Medicina (FAMED), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Chachapoyas 01001, Amazonas, Peru.

Abstract

Background/objectives

Tuberculosis treatment outcomes are often dichotomized into heterogeneous composites that may obscure outcome-specific associations. We compared baseline characteristics across mutually exclusive out-comes-loss to follow-up (LTFU), death, and not evaluated/transferred versus documented cure-and examined the composite endpoints secondarily in a prospective cohort of adults with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis treated in Lima, Peru, in 2010-2011.Methods

The complete-case cohort included 1233 participants. The primary analysis used ridge-penalized multinomial logistic regression (lambda = 0.16); a mean bias-reduced multinomial model assessed sparse-data sensitivity.Results

Overall, 1016 participants were cured, 127 experienced LTFU, 30 died, and 60 were not evaluated/transferred. Drug use was associated primarily with LTFU (aOR 4.15; 95% CI 2.55-6.75), whereas HIV-positive status showed the largest, although imprecisely estimated, association with death (aOR 32.12; 95% CI 8.95-115.33; six deaths among 22 HIV-positive participants). The bias-reduced estimate was similar (aOR 35.56; 95% CI 9.80-129.08). Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis was associated with several non-cure categories; its association with the combined not evaluated/transferred category was largely driven by participants still in treatment at database closure. Composite endpoints changed the magnitude and interpretation of several associations and did not eliminate sparse outcome-exposure cells.Conclusions

Endpoint definitions therefore materially shaped epidemiologic inference. Dis-aggregated outcomes should be reported alongside composite indicators, and findings from this historical cohort should not be interpreted as contemporary risk estimates for Lima.

Related

  1. 456 External validation of the SITC consensus definitions of primary and secondary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with solid tumors
    Ali Awada, Sary Faraj, Ali Tarhini +13
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
  2. Long-Term Complications and Secondary Procedures After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures: A Descriptive Epidemiologic Study of Over 50,000 Patients.
    Abdel Kareem Hilo, Ahmad Almaat, Bashar Jawich +10
    Orthopedic ReviewsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  3. Asymptomatic Tuberculosis in the Namibia National Tuberculosis Prevalence Survey: Occurrence Under Various Case Definitions
    Nunurai Ruswa, Gunar Gunther, Farai Mavhunga +2
    Tropical Medicine & International HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textInfectious diseasePMC
  4. Evaluate epidemiologic burden, treatment patterns and treatment outcomes of advanced prostate cancer in Hong Kong using territory-wide electronic medical records
    X. Li, Y. Jiao, J. Wang
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textOncologymedRxiv
  5. Search for the glycated hemoglobin target minimizing mortality among people with type 2 diabetes with rare incidence of treatment-related severe hypoglycemia – Epidemiologic analysis of J-DOIT3 randomized controlled trial
    Mitsuhiko Noda, Kohjiro Ueki, Takayoshi Sasako +9
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEndocrinology & metabolismPLOSEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{veraponce2026endpoint,
  title = {{How Endpoint Definitions Shape Epidemiologic Inference on Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis from Lima, Peru.}},
  author = {Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce and Jhosmer Ballena-Caicedo and Namibia Jherly Cervera Vasquez and Marcos Daniel García-Rodríguez and Jorge Alejandro Yumpo Ynga and Fiorella E Zuzunaga-Montoya},
  journal = {Infectious disease reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/idr18050108},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930499},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - How Endpoint Definitions Shape Epidemiologic Inference on Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis from Lima, Peru.
AU  - Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce
AU  - Jhosmer Ballena-Caicedo
AU  - Namibia Jherly Cervera Vasquez
AU  - Marcos Daniel García-Rodríguez
AU  - Jorge Alejandro Yumpo Ynga
AU  - Fiorella E Zuzunaga-Montoya
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/26
JO  - Infectious disease reports
DO  - 10.3390/idr18050108
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930499
AB  - Background/objectives  Tuberculosis treatment outcomes are often dichotomized into heterogeneous composites that may obscure outcome-specific associations. We compared baseline characteristics across mutually exclusive out-comes-loss to follow-up (LTFU), death, and not evaluated/transferred versus documented cure-and examined the composite endpoints secondarily in a prospective cohort of adults with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis treated in Lima, Peru, in 2010-2011.Methods  The complete-case cohort included 1233 participants. The primary analysis used ridge-penalized multinomial logistic regression (lambda = 0.16); a mean bias-reduced multinomial model assessed sparse-data sensitivity.Results  Overall, 1016 participants were cured, 127 experienced LTFU, 30 died, and 60 were not evaluated/transferred. Drug use was associated primarily with LTFU (aOR 4.15; 95% CI 2.55-6.75), whereas HIV-positive status showed the largest, although imprecisely estimated, association with death (aOR 32.12; 95% CI 8.95-115.33; six deaths among 22 HIV-positive participants). The bias-reduced estimate was similar (aOR 35.56; 95% CI 9.80-129.08). Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis was associated with several non-cure categories; its association with the combined not evaluated/transferred category was largely driven by participants still in treatment at database closure. Composite endpoints changed the magnitude and interpretation of several associations and did not eliminate sparse outcome-exposure cells.Conclusions  Endpoint definitions therefore materially shaped epidemiologic inference. Dis-aggregated outcomes should be reported alongside composite indicators, and findings from this historical cohort should not be interpreted as contemporary risk estimates for Lima.
SN  - 2036-7430
SN  - 2036-7449
ER  -