Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Neurosurgical Review

Dynamic craniotomy with NuCrani plates versus craniotomy with fixed plates: A propensity score matched study

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida at Halifax Health, Daytona Beach, 32219 USA
  2. 2Florida State University College of Medicine, Daytona Beach, USA
  3. 3Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery at the University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
  4. 4Neurosurgery Service, AdventHealth, Daytona Beach, USA

Abstract

Dynamic craniotomy provides for cranial decompression by enabling controlled outward bone flap movement to accommodate postoperative cerebral swelling and/or hemorrhage. The study objective was to compare outcomes in patients who underwent dynamic craniotomy with those who underwent fixed plate craniotomy for the treatment of intracranial hemorrhage from traumatic brain injury. A review of our clinical series of 55 consecutive patients undergoing either dynamic craniotomy bone flap fixation with NeuroVention NuCrani plates or fixed plate craniotomy bone flap fixation for traumatic injuries was conducted. Clinical and radiographic characteristics were reviewed for each patient. To reduce confounding factors, propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare outcomes in both groups. Outward bone flap migration to compensate for post operative cerebral swelling was noted in 84% of the dynamic craniotomy group and 40% of the dynamic patients had 8 mm or more bone flap outward migration for severe brain swelling. Dynamic craniotomy was associated with lower postoperative midline shift (1.8 mm dynamic versus 6.0 mm fixed), lower observed mortality (16.0% versus 46.7%), and a higher proportion of patients with good outcome (84.0% versus 33.3%). Propensity score analysis using logistic regression and matching based on age, admission Glasgow Coma Score, preoperative midline shift, and preoperative extra-axial hematoma thickness was used to reduce measured baseline differences. The association between dynamic craniotomy and favorable outcome remained consistent after propensity-score adjustment. Dynamic craniotomy was associated with improved radiographic and clinical outcomes in this retrospective propensity-score matched study. The dynamic technique offers a notable advantage by enabling instant intracranial volume expansion and reversible outward bone flap migration in patients with postoperative worsening brain swelling and/or hemorrhage.

Related

  1. Quantified standardized individualized small craniotomy vs. conventional large craniotomy for cerebral herniation secondary to acute supratentorial epidural hematoma: a propensity score-matched study for emergency and battlefield trauma care
    Gen-Ping Cai, Xue-Feng Zheng, Yuan Zhang +4
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeurologyCrossref
  2. Interferon-based HBV function cure therapy reduces hepatocellular carcinoma risk in low-HBsAg chronic hepatitis B patients: a propensity-matched cohort study and dynamic prediction model
    Yurong Gu, Peipei Wang, Qinyao Xu +5
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  3. Localiser-Based Software-Assisted Patient Positioning in Chest CT: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Added to Statin Therapy and Cardiovascular Outcomes in ASCVD A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study
    S. Tah, M. Cheshire
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textCardiovascular medicinemedRxiv
  5. Commentary on “Postoperative complications and mechanical outcomes following endoscopic versus open lumbar fusion: a propensity-matched analysis”
    Takashi Kaito
    North American Spine Society JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
BibTeX
@article{khanna2026dynamic,
  title = {{Dynamic craniotomy with NuCrani plates versus craniotomy with fixed plates: A propensity score matched study}},
  author = {Rohit Khanna and Gilberto Perez-Rodriguez-Garcia and Paul R. Krafft and Ian Tafel and Nohra Chalouhi and Muhammad A. B. Chowdhury and Anjali Khanna and Carlton Christie and Steven Roth and Jason Blatt and Patrick Han and Federico Vinas},
  journal = {Neurosurgical Review},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1007/s10143-026-04547-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-026-04547-9},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dynamic craniotomy with NuCrani plates versus craniotomy with fixed plates: A propensity score matched study
AU  - Rohit Khanna
AU  - Gilberto Perez-Rodriguez-Garcia
AU  - Paul R. Krafft
AU  - Ian Tafel
AU  - Nohra Chalouhi
AU  - Muhammad A. B. Chowdhury
AU  - Anjali Khanna
AU  - Carlton Christie
AU  - Steven Roth
AU  - Jason Blatt
AU  - Patrick Han
AU  - Federico Vinas
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
JO  - Neurosurgical Review
DO  - 10.1007/s10143-026-04547-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-026-04547-9
AB  - Dynamic craniotomy provides for cranial decompression by enabling controlled outward bone flap movement to accommodate postoperative cerebral swelling and/or hemorrhage. The study objective was to compare outcomes in patients who underwent dynamic craniotomy with those who underwent fixed plate craniotomy for the treatment of intracranial hemorrhage from traumatic brain injury. A review of our clinical series of 55 consecutive patients undergoing either dynamic craniotomy bone flap fixation with NeuroVention NuCrani plates or fixed plate craniotomy bone flap fixation for traumatic injuries was conducted. Clinical and radiographic characteristics were reviewed for each patient. To reduce confounding factors, propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare outcomes in both groups. Outward bone flap migration to compensate for post operative cerebral swelling was noted in 84% of the dynamic craniotomy group and 40% of the dynamic patients had 8 mm or more bone flap outward migration for severe brain swelling. Dynamic craniotomy was associated with lower postoperative midline shift (1.8 mm dynamic versus 6.0 mm fixed), lower observed mortality (16.0% versus 46.7%), and a higher proportion of patients with good outcome (84.0% versus 33.3%). Propensity score analysis using logistic regression and matching based on age, admission Glasgow Coma Score, preoperative midline shift, and preoperative extra-axial hematoma thickness was used to reduce measured baseline differences. The association between dynamic craniotomy and favorable outcome remained consistent after propensity-score adjustment. Dynamic craniotomy was associated with improved radiographic and clinical outcomes in this retrospective propensity-score matched study. The dynamic technique offers a notable advantage by enabling instant intracranial volume expansion and reversible outward bone flap migration in patients with postoperative worsening brain swelling and/or hemorrhage.
SN  - 0344-5607
SN  - 1437-2320
ER  -