Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of High Energy Physics

Crosscap defects

  1. 1King’s College London
  2. 2Department of Theoretical Physics, CERN
  3. 3Laboratory for Theoretical Fundamental Physics, EPFL

Abstract

A bstract : We introduce a novel class of defects, termed crosscap defects , in conformal field theory (CFT) in general dimensions. These arise from quotienting the spacetime by a ℤ ₂ automorphism, and provide higher-codimension generalisations of CFTs on real projective space (ℝℙd) RP d . Crosscap defects extend along a p -dimensional fixed locus of the ℤ ₂ action and preserve an SO ( p + 1, 1) × PO ( d – p ) subgroup of the conformal group. The two-point functions of operators in this setup exhibit three operator product expansion channels: bulk, image, and defect. These lead to several crosscap crossing equations , which we present. We analyse conformal block decompositions and show that the blocks are identical to defect CFT blocks up to a redefinition of cross ratios. As concrete examples, we study crosscap defects in the O ( N ) model at the Gaussian and Wilson-Fisher fixed points in the ε -expansion. We compute explicitly the associated CFT data as a function of p and find that, unlike standard defects, displacement and tilt operators are absent for generic p . They provide examples of defect conformal manifolds without exactly marginal operators.

Related

  1. Surface defects and instanton–vortex interaction
    Alexander Gorsky, Bruno Le Floch, Alexey Milekhin +1
    Nuclear Physics BPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull text35 citedHigh-energy & particle physicsHAL
  2. Vacancy defects in square–triangle tilings and their implications for quasicrystals formed by square-shoulder particles
    Alptuğ Ulugöl, Giovanni del Monte, Eline K. Kempkes +2
    The Journal of Chemical PhysicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedCondensed matterHAL
  3. Surface-pinned nonsingular topologically charged defects in nanoplasmonics
    Michael I. Tribelsky, Vladimir V. Ternovski
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsOptics & photonicsarXiv
  4. Integer defects in active nematics of ellipsoidal Quincke rollers
    Bao Ying Fan, Lin Liu, Jie Wu +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Nonreciprocity Propels Nematic Defects
    Yunpeng Cao, Yu Du, Yao Li
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
BibTeX
@article{drukker2026crosscap,
  title = {{Crosscap defects}},
  author = {Nadav Drukker and Shota Komatsu and Anders Wallberg},
  journal = {Journal of High Energy Physics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/jhep10(2026)241},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP10(2026)241},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Crosscap defects
AU  - Nadav Drukker
AU  - Shota Komatsu
AU  - Anders Wallberg
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Journal of High Energy Physics
DO  - 10.1007/jhep10(2026)241
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP10(2026)241
AB  - A bstract : We introduce a novel class of defects, termed crosscap defects , in conformal field theory (CFT) in general dimensions. These arise from quotienting the spacetime by a ℤ ₂ automorphism, and provide higher-codimension generalisations of CFTs on real projective space (ℝℙ^d) RP d . Crosscap defects extend along a p -dimensional fixed locus of the ℤ ₂ action and preserve an SO ( p + 1, 1) × PO ( d – p ) subgroup of the conformal group. The two-point functions of operators in this setup exhibit three operator product expansion channels: bulk, image, and defect. These lead to several crosscap crossing equations , which we present. We analyse conformal block decompositions and show that the blocks are identical to defect CFT blocks up to a redefinition of cross ratios. As concrete examples, we study crosscap defects in the O ( N ) model at the Gaussian and Wilson-Fisher fixed points in the ε -expansion. We compute explicitly the associated CFT data as a function of p and find that, unlike standard defects, displacement and tilt operators are absent for generic p . They provide examples of defect conformal manifolds without exactly marginal operators.
SN  - 1029-8479
ER  -