Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: a network meta-analysis.
9 affiliations
- 1Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieio Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
- 2Cochrane Athens, Athens, Greece.
- 3School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
- 4School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
- 5Assisted Reproduction Unit, Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
- 6Statistics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
- 7University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- 8Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
- 9Ginecologia e Obstetricia, UFRGS-FAMED, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Abstract
Objectives
This is a protocol for a Cochrane review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the comparative benefits and harms of systemic antibiotic regimens for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease in women of reproductive age. The secondary objectives are: to estimate the incremental effect of adding nitroimidazole to an antibiotic backbone; to compare the efficacy of azithromycin-containing regimens with relevant alternatives, where the evidence network permits (in Network B, this comparison depends on setting-disaggregated data from a single eligible trial and may not be estimable); and to describe narratively whether treatment hierarchies appear consistent between the outpatient (Network A) and inpatient (Network B) evidence, since direct statistical comparison between networks is not undertaken.
Related
- Acne therapy with isotretinoin is well tolerated in patients with established inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective, single center study.
- HMGB1-targeted anti-inflammatory rBox A gene therapy for viral airway infections and systemic inflammatory disease models
- Dietary Polyphenols as Adjunctive Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- The p38 MAPK/MSK1/NF-κB axis in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a testable hypothesis for innate immune inflammatory amplification
- Layered phage therapy exploits capsule-loss escape and altered antibiotic susceptibility in CG23 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae
BibTeX
@article{papapanou2026antibiotic,
title = {{Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: a network meta-analysis.}},
author = {Michail Papapanou and Melina Nikolakea and Ismini Tsakiri and Maria Toulaki and Kalliopi Syristatidi and Charalampos S Siristatidis and Patricia Ziegelmann and Jonathan Ross and Ricardo F Savaris},
journal = {The Cochrane database of systematic reviews},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1002/14651858.cd016401},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42905124},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: a network meta-analysis.
AU - Michail Papapanou
AU - Melina Nikolakea
AU - Ismini Tsakiri
AU - Maria Toulaki
AU - Kalliopi Syristatidi
AU - Charalampos S Siristatidis
AU - Patricia Ziegelmann
AU - Jonathan Ross
AU - Ricardo F Savaris
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
DO - 10.1002/14651858.cd016401
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42905124
AB - Objectives This is a protocol for a Cochrane review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the comparative benefits and harms of systemic antibiotic regimens for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease in women of reproductive age. The secondary objectives are: to estimate the incremental effect of adding nitroimidazole to an antibiotic backbone; to compare the efficacy of azithromycin-containing regimens with relevant alternatives, where the evidence network permits (in Network B, this comparison depends on setting-disaggregated data from a single eligible trial and may not be estimable); and to describe narratively whether treatment hierarchies appear consistent between the outpatient (Network A) and inpatient (Network B) evidence, since direct statistical comparison between networks is not undertaken.
SN - 1469-493X
ER -