Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

External validation of the HALP score for predicting in-hospital and long-term outcomes in acute heart failure: a retrospective cohort study

  1. 1Department of Cardiology, Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital

Abstract

Background: The hemoglobin–albumin–lymphocyte–platelet (HALP) score integrates nutritional, inflammatory, and hematologic status and has been proposed as a prognostic marker in acute heart failure (AHF), but external validation is limited.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 197 consecutive patients hospitalized with AHF at a tertiary center. HALP was calculated at admission, and the pre-specified outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged hospital stay (>7 days), all-cause mortality over follow-up, and heart-failure rehospitalization. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) with DeLong 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and associations were tested with crude and age/sex-adjusted logistic regression (in-hospital outcomes) and Cox regression (mortality over follow-up), using both data-derived (Youden) and pre-specified HALP thresholds.

Results: The cohort had a median age of 71 years (30.5% female) and a median follow-up of 15.5 months; in-hospital mortality was 12.7%, prolonged stay 19.4%, and all-cause mortality 31.0%. HALP did not discriminate any outcome (AUC 0.53 [95% CI 0.41–0.65] for in-hospital mortality, 0.47 [0.36–0.59] for prolonged stay, and 0.57 [0.48–0.66] for all-cause mortality; all CIs included 0.50). A Youden-optimized threshold appeared associated with mortality in logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio 2.02, 95% CI 1.02–4.00), but the signal vanished under pre-specified thresholds (median-split adjusted odds ratio 1.23, 0.67–2.28) and in time-to-event analysis (adjusted hazard ratio per 1-SD decrease 1.04, 0.78-1.38; Youden threshold 1.75, 0.97-3.16; log-rank across quartiles p = 0.15). In the same patients, the established EHMRG and MAGGIC scores discriminated mortality (AUC 0.71 and 0.65; CIs excluding 0.50), whereas HALP correlated only with severity markers (NYHA class rho = −0.31; NT-proBNP rho = −0.16; CRP rho = −0.17).

Conclusion: In this independent cohort, HALP reflected disease severity but did not predict outcomes once cutoff-optimization bias was removed, and should not be used as a stand-alone risk-stratification tool in AHF.

Related

  1. Development and external validation of machine learning models for predicting mortality in patients with lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
    Lihui Liu, Pan Zuo, Chunlan Yu +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
  2. Development and external validation of a preoperative prediction model for in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events after hip fracture surgery in older adults: a retrospective two-center study.
    Ruimin Luo, Jirong Yang, Jieqiang Du +5
    BMC geriatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. Initial Emergency Department Triage Narratives for Predicting Hospital Admission and Early Critical Outcomes: A Retrospective Chronological Split Study
    Patryk Konieczka, Julia Żukowska-Karolak, Tomasz Kłosiewicz
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  4. Data-driven reweighting of the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices using German claims data: development for in-hospital mortality only, external validation across clinical and health-economic outcomes.
    Klaus Kaier, Derek Hazard, Adrian Heidenreich +4
    Health economics reviewPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  5. Development and Validation of Daping Orthopedics Operative Risk Scoring System for Geriatric Hip Fracture (DOORS‐GHF) for Predicting Postoperative Outcomes in Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Comparative Study
    Zhiwei Gong, Yu Wang, Weiwen Zhu +8
    Orthopaedic SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
BibTeX
@article{aydın2026external,
  title = {{External validation of the HALP score for predicting in-hospital and long-term outcomes in acute heart failure: a retrospective cohort study}},
  author = {Mehmet Zafer Aydın and Mustafa Gök and Mehmet Kamil Teber and Zülfiye Kuzu and Ziya Şimşek},
  journal = {Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fcvm.2026.1958343},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1958343/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - External validation of the HALP score for predicting in-hospital and long-term outcomes in acute heart failure: a retrospective cohort study
AU  - Mehmet Zafer Aydın
AU  - Mustafa Gök
AU  - Mehmet Kamil Teber
AU  - Zülfiye Kuzu
AU  - Ziya Şimşek
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1958343
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1958343/full
AB  - Background: The hemoglobin–albumin–lymphocyte–platelet (HALP) score integrates nutritional, inflammatory, and hematologic status and has been proposed as a prognostic marker in acute heart failure (AHF), but external validation is limited.  Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 197 consecutive patients hospitalized with AHF at a tertiary center. HALP was calculated at admission, and the pre-specified outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged hospital stay (>7 days), all-cause mortality over follow-up, and heart-failure rehospitalization. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) with DeLong 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and associations were tested with crude and age/sex-adjusted logistic regression (in-hospital outcomes) and Cox regression (mortality over follow-up), using both data-derived (Youden) and pre-specified HALP thresholds.  Results: The cohort had a median age of 71 years (30.5% female) and a median follow-up of 15.5 months; in-hospital mortality was 12.7%, prolonged stay 19.4%, and all-cause mortality 31.0%. HALP did not discriminate any outcome (AUC 0.53 [95% CI 0.41–0.65] for in-hospital mortality, 0.47 [0.36–0.59] for prolonged stay, and 0.57 [0.48–0.66] for all-cause mortality; all CIs included 0.50). A Youden-optimized threshold appeared associated with mortality in logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio 2.02, 95% CI 1.02–4.00), but the signal vanished under pre-specified thresholds (median-split adjusted odds ratio 1.23, 0.67–2.28) and in time-to-event analysis (adjusted hazard ratio per 1-SD decrease 1.04, 0.78-1.38; Youden threshold 1.75, 0.97-3.16; log-rank across quartiles p = 0.15). In the same patients, the established EHMRG and MAGGIC scores discriminated mortality (AUC 0.71 and 0.65; CIs excluding 0.50), whereas HALP correlated only with severity markers (NYHA class rho = −0.31; NT-proBNP rho = −0.16; CRP rho = −0.17).  Conclusion: In this independent cohort, HALP reflected disease severity but did not predict outcomes once cutoff-optimization bias was removed, and should not be used as a stand-alone risk-stratification tool in AHF.
SN  - 2297-055X
ER  -