Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Serial dependence carries the action that produced the previous report

  1. 1Neuro-Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich

Abstract

Serial dependence pulls current judgments toward the recent past, but what is carried forward is debated: the previous stimulus, the previous decision, or something about the report itself. Three magnitude-reproduction experiments separated these sources. Participants viewed dot arrays that varied independently in duration and numerosity, then reproduced the cued dimension by holding a key while a display accumulated, so that both magnitudes were produced through the same action. A response-history model partitioned the attraction into previous-stimulus and previous-response paths. The previous response predicted cross-dimensional attraction after controlling for the previous and current stimuli: a numerosity report biased the next duration judgment and vice versa (Experiment 1), also when each task used its own response key (Experiment 2). A task switch weakened this carryover without abolishing it. Experiment 3 randomized, trial by trial, whether a reported number required a long or a short key hold. The influence of a previous number on the next duration judgment changed with this mapping, showing that reported value alone did not account for carryover. Conventional stimulus-based measures showed none of this cross-task history. Serial dependence can therefore carry the trace of the action through which a previous judgment was expressed, bounded but not gated by task context.

Related

  1. Gaze on IPCC climate maps carries behaviour-specific signals for intended low-carbon action
    Étienne Serbe-Kamp, Ayshan Aliyeva, Candelaria Belen Krick +5
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  2. Towards Neurodiversity-Affirming, Co-Produced Competence Frameworks in Psychotherapy: An Autistic-Led Call to Action
    Laurence Cobbaert, Marie Camin, K. W. Schweizer +10
    AutismPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text6 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
  3. Perceptual repulsion and decisional attraction in male body serial dependence: a dimensional dissociation in channel architecture
    J. Cass, D. Talbot
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Serial dependence in haptic perception during active manual exploration.
    Y. Zhang, T. Nakamura, T. Hanakawa +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Slow change blindness from serial dependence: slowly changing objects are perceived as biased toward the past.
    Haley G Frey, David Whitney
    BMC biologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@misc{qu2026serial,
  title = {{Serial dependence carries the action that produced the previous report}},
  author = {C. Qu and C. Naeve and Z. Shi},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.27.762257},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.762257v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Serial dependence carries the action that produced the previous report
AU  - C. Qu
AU  - C. Naeve
AU  - Z. Shi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.27.762257
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.762257v1
AB  - Serial dependence pulls current judgments toward the recent past, but what is carried forward is debated: the previous stimulus, the previous decision, or something about the report itself. Three magnitude-reproduction experiments separated these sources. Participants viewed dot arrays that varied independently in duration and numerosity, then reproduced the cued dimension by holding a key while a display accumulated, so that both magnitudes were produced through the same action. A response-history model partitioned the attraction into previous-stimulus and previous-response paths. The previous response predicted cross-dimensional attraction after controlling for the previous and current stimuli: a numerosity report biased the next duration judgment and vice versa (Experiment 1), also when each task used its own response key (Experiment 2). A task switch weakened this carryover without abolishing it. Experiment 3 randomized, trial by trial, whether a reported number required a long or a short key hold. The influence of a previous number on the next duration judgment changed with this mapping, showing that reported value alone did not account for carryover. Conventional stimulus-based measures showed none of this cross-task history. Serial dependence can therefore carry the trace of the action through which a previous judgment was expressed, bounded but not gated by task context.
ER  -